Rework bibliography
This commit is contained in:
parent
ed6f59cf50
commit
ce583cc987
1149
phd-thesis.bib
1149
phd-thesis.bib
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
@ -835,7 +835,7 @@ During conceptual design, it was found that the guaranteed stability property of
|
||||
To address this instability issue, two modifications to the classical IFF control scheme were proposed and analyzed.
|
||||
The first involves a minor adjustment to the control law itself, while the second incorporates physical springs in parallel with the force sensors.
|
||||
Stability conditions and optimal parameter tuning guidelines were derived for both modified schemes.
|
||||
This is further discussed in Section\nbsp{}ref:sec:rotating and was the subject of publications \nbsp{}[[cite:&dehaeze20_activ_dampin_rotat_platf_integ_force_feedb;&dehaeze21_activ_dampin_rotat_platf_using]].
|
||||
This is further discussed in Section\nbsp{}ref:sec:rotating and was the subject of a publication\nbsp{}[[cite:&dehaeze21_activ_dampin_rotat_platf_using]].
|
||||
|
||||
***** Design of complementary filters using $\mathcal{H}_\infty$ Synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
@ -5095,7 +5095,7 @@ Through coordinate transformation using the Jacobian matrix, the dynamics in the
|
||||
|
||||
Although this simplified model provides useful insights, real Stewart platforms exhibit more complex behaviors.
|
||||
Several factors can significantly increase the model complexity, such as:
|
||||
- Strut dynamics, including mass distribution and internal resonances\nbsp{}[[cite:&afzali-far16_inert_matrix_hexap_strut_joint_space;&chen04_decoup_contr_flexur_joint_hexap]]
|
||||
- Strut dynamics, including mass distribution and internal resonances\nbsp{}[[cite:&chen04_decoup_contr_flexur_joint_hexap]]
|
||||
- Joint compliance and friction effects\nbsp{}[[cite:&mcinroy00_desig_contr_flexur_joint_hexap;&mcinroy02_model_desig_flexur_joint_stewar]]
|
||||
- Supporting structure dynamics and payload dynamics, which are both very critical for NASS
|
||||
|
||||
@ -8014,7 +8014,7 @@ One way to overcome these limitations is to combine several sensors using a tech
|
||||
Fortunately, a wide variety of sensors exists, each with different characteristics.
|
||||
By carefully selecting the sensors to be fused, a "super sensor" is obtained that combines the benefits of the individual sensors.
|
||||
|
||||
In some applications, sensor fusion is employed to increase measurement bandwidth\nbsp{}[[cite:&shaw90_bandw_enhan_posit_measur_using_measur_accel;&zimmermann92_high_bandw_orien_measur_contr;&min15_compl_filter_desig_angle_estim]].
|
||||
In some applications, sensor fusion is employed to increase measurement bandwidth\nbsp{}[[cite:&shaw90_bandw_enhan_posit_measur_using_measur_accel;&zimmermann92_high_bandw_orien_measur_contr]].
|
||||
For instance, in\nbsp{}[[cite:&shaw90_bandw_enhan_posit_measur_using_measur_accel]], the bandwidth of a position sensor is extended by fusing it with an accelerometer that provides high-frequency motion information.
|
||||
In other applications, sensor fusion is used to obtain an estimate of the measured quantity with reduced noise\nbsp{}[[cite:&hua05_low_ligo;&hua04_polyp_fir_compl_filter_contr_system;&plummer06_optim_compl_filter_their_applic_motion_measur;&robert12_introd_random_signal_applied_kalman]].
|
||||
More recently, the fusion of sensors measuring different physical quantities has been proposed to enhance control properties\nbsp{}[[cite:&collette15_sensor_fusion_method_high_perfor;&yong16_high_speed_vertic_posit_stage]].
|
||||
@ -8022,12 +8022,12 @@ In\nbsp{}[[cite:&collette15_sensor_fusion_method_high_perfor]], an inertial sens
|
||||
|
||||
Beyond Stewart platforms, practical applications of sensor fusion are numerous.
|
||||
It is widely implemented for attitude estimation in autonomous vehicles such as unmanned aerial vehicles\nbsp{}[[cite:&baerveldt97_low_cost_low_weigh_attit;&corke04_inert_visual_sensin_system_small_auton_helic;&jensen13_basic_uas]] and underwater vehicles\nbsp{}[[cite:&pascoal99_navig_system_desig_using_time;&batista10_optim_posit_veloc_navig_filter_auton_vehic]].
|
||||
Sensor fusion offers significant benefits for high-performance positioning control as demonstrated in\nbsp{}[[cite:&shaw90_bandw_enhan_posit_measur_using_measur_accel;&zimmermann92_high_bandw_orien_measur_contr;&min15_compl_filter_desig_angle_estim;&yong16_high_speed_vertic_posit_stage]].
|
||||
Sensor fusion offers significant benefits for high-performance positioning control as demonstrated in\nbsp{}[[cite:&shaw90_bandw_enhan_posit_measur_using_measur_accel;&zimmermann92_high_bandw_orien_measur_contr;&yong16_high_speed_vertic_posit_stage]].
|
||||
It has also been identified as a key technology for improving the performance of active vibration isolation systems\nbsp{}[[cite:&tjepkema12_sensor_fusion_activ_vibrat_isolat_precis_equip]].
|
||||
Emblematic examples include the isolation stages of gravitational wave detectors\nbsp{}[[cite:&collette15_sensor_fusion_method_high_perfor;&heijningen18_low]] such as those employed at LIGO\nbsp{}[[cite:&hua05_low_ligo;&hua04_polyp_fir_compl_filter_contr_system]] and Virgo\nbsp{}[[cite:&lucia18_low_frequen_optim_perfor_advan]].
|
||||
|
||||
Two principal methods are employed to perform sensor fusion: using complementary filters\nbsp{}[[cite:&anderson53_instr_approac_system_steer_comput]] or using Kalman filtering\nbsp{}[[cite:&brown72_integ_navig_system_kalman_filter]].
|
||||
For sensor fusion applications, these methods share many relationships\nbsp{}[[cite:&brown72_integ_navig_system_kalman_filter;&higgins75_compar_compl_kalman_filter;&robert12_introd_random_signal_applied_kalman;&fonseca15_compl]].
|
||||
For sensor fusion applications, these methods share many relationships\nbsp{}[[cite:&brown72_integ_navig_system_kalman_filter;&higgins75_compar_compl_kalman_filter;&robert12_introd_random_signal_applied_kalman;&carreira15_compl_filter_desig_three_frequen_bands]].
|
||||
However, Kalman filtering requires assumptions about the probabilistic characteristics of sensor noise\nbsp{}[[cite:&robert12_introd_random_signal_applied_kalman]], whereas complementary filters do not impose such requirements.
|
||||
Furthermore, complementary filters offer advantages over Kalman filtering for sensor fusion through their general applicability, low computational cost\nbsp{}[[cite:&higgins75_compar_compl_kalman_filter]], and intuitive nature, as their effects can be readily interpreted in the frequency domain.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -8037,7 +8037,7 @@ While analog complementary filters remain in use today\nbsp{}[[cite:&yong16_high
|
||||
|
||||
Various design methods have been developed to optimize complementary filters.
|
||||
The most straightforward approach is based on analytical formulas, which depending on the application may be first order\nbsp{}[[cite:&corke04_inert_visual_sensin_system_small_auton_helic;&yeh05_model_contr_hydraul_actuat_two;&yong16_high_speed_vertic_posit_stage]], second order\nbsp{}[[cite:&baerveldt97_low_cost_low_weigh_attit;&stoten01_fusion_kinet_data_using_compos_filter;&jensen13_basic_uas]], or higher orders\nbsp{}[[cite:&shaw90_bandw_enhan_posit_measur_using_measur_accel;&zimmermann92_high_bandw_orien_measur_contr;&stoten01_fusion_kinet_data_using_compos_filter;&collette15_sensor_fusion_method_high_perfor;&matichard15_seism_isolat_advan_ligo]].
|
||||
Since the characteristics of the super sensor depend on proper complementary filter design\nbsp{}[[cite:&dehaeze19_compl_filter_shapin_using_synth]], several optimization techniques have emerged—ranging from optimizing parameters for analytical formulas\nbsp{}[[cite:&jensen13_basic_uas;&min15_compl_filter_desig_angle_estim;&fonseca15_compl]] to employing convex optimization tools\nbsp{}[[cite:&hua04_polyp_fir_compl_filter_contr_system;&hua05_low_ligo]] such as linear matrix inequalities\nbsp{}[[cite:&pascoal99_navig_system_desig_using_time]].
|
||||
Since the characteristics of the super sensor depend on proper complementary filter design\nbsp{}[[cite:&dehaeze19_compl_filter_shapin_using_synth]], several optimization techniques have emerged—ranging from optimizing parameters for analytical formulas\nbsp{}[[cite:&jensen13_basic_uas;&carreira15_compl_filter_desig_three_frequen_bands]] to employing convex optimization tools\nbsp{}[[cite:&hua04_polyp_fir_compl_filter_contr_system;&hua05_low_ligo]] such as linear matrix inequalities\nbsp{}[[cite:&pascoal99_navig_system_desig_using_time]].
|
||||
As demonstrated in\nbsp{}[[cite:&plummer06_optim_compl_filter_their_applic_motion_measur]], complementary filter design can be linked to the standard mixed-sensitivity control problem, allowing powerful classical control theory tools to be applied.
|
||||
For example, in\nbsp{}[[cite:&jensen13_basic_uas]], two gains of a Proportional Integral (PI) controller are optimized to minimize super sensor noise.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -8350,14 +8350,14 @@ This straightforward example demonstrates that the proposed methodology for shap
|
||||
**** Synthesis of a set of three complementary filters
|
||||
<<ssec:detail_control_sensor_hinf_three_comp_filters>>
|
||||
|
||||
Certain applications necessitate the fusion of more than two sensors\nbsp{}[[cite:&stoten01_fusion_kinet_data_using_compos_filter;&fonseca15_compl]].
|
||||
Certain applications necessitate the fusion of more than two sensors\nbsp{}[[cite:&stoten01_fusion_kinet_data_using_compos_filter;&carreira15_compl_filter_desig_three_frequen_bands]].
|
||||
At LIGO, for example, a super sensor is formed by merging three distinct sensors: an LVDT, a seismometer, and a geophone\nbsp{}[[cite:&matichard15_seism_isolat_advan_ligo]].
|
||||
|
||||
For merging $n>2$ sensors with complementary filters, two architectural approaches are possible, as illustrated in Figure\nbsp{}ref:fig:detail_control_sensor_fusion_three.
|
||||
Fusion can be implemented either "sequentially," using $n-1$ sets of two complementary filters (Figure\nbsp{}ref:fig:detail_control_sensor_fusion_three_sequential), or "in parallel," employing a single set of $n$ complementary filters (Figure\nbsp{}ref:fig:detail_control_sensor_fusion_three_parallel).
|
||||
|
||||
While conventional sensor fusion synthesis techniques can be applied to the sequential approach, parallel architecture implementation requires a novel synthesis method for multiple complementary filters.
|
||||
Previous literature has offered only simple analytical formulas for this purpose\nbsp{}[[cite:&stoten01_fusion_kinet_data_using_compos_filter;&fonseca15_compl]].
|
||||
Previous literature has offered only simple analytical formulas for this purpose\nbsp{}[[cite:&stoten01_fusion_kinet_data_using_compos_filter;&carreira15_compl_filter_desig_three_frequen_bands]].
|
||||
This section presents a generalization of the proposed complementary filter synthesis method to address this gap.
|
||||
|
||||
#+name: fig:detail_control_sensor_fusion_three
|
||||
|
BIN
phd-thesis.pdf
BIN
phd-thesis.pdf
Binary file not shown.
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
% Created 2025-04-21 Mon 23:35
|
||||
% Created 2025-04-22 Tue 16:24
|
||||
% Intended LaTeX compiler: pdflatex
|
||||
\documentclass[a4paper, 10pt, DIV=12, parskip=full, bibliography=totoc]{scrreprt}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
|
||||
\addbibresource{ref.bib}
|
||||
\addbibresource{phd-thesis.bib}
|
||||
\author{Dehaeze Thomas}
|
||||
\date{2025-04-21}
|
||||
\date{2025-04-22}
|
||||
\title{Nano Active Stabilization of samples for tomography experiments: A mechatronic design approach}
|
||||
\subtitle{PhD Thesis}
|
||||
\hypersetup{
|
||||
@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ During conceptual design, it was found that the guaranteed stability property of
|
||||
To address this instability issue, two modifications to the classical IFF control scheme were proposed and analyzed.
|
||||
The first involves a minor adjustment to the control law itself, while the second incorporates physical springs in parallel with the force sensors.
|
||||
Stability conditions and optimal parameter tuning guidelines were derived for both modified schemes.
|
||||
This is further discussed in Section~\ref{sec:rotating} and was the subject of publications ~\cite{dehaeze20_activ_dampin_rotat_platf_integ_force_feedb,dehaeze21_activ_dampin_rotat_platf_using}.
|
||||
This is further discussed in Section~\ref{sec:rotating} and was the subject of a publication~\cite{dehaeze21_activ_dampin_rotat_platf_using}.
|
||||
\paragraph{Design of complementary filters using \(\mathcal{H}_\infty\) Synthesis}
|
||||
|
||||
For implementing sensor fusion, where signals from multiple sensors are combined, complementary filters are often employed.
|
||||
@ -4666,7 +4666,7 @@ Through coordinate transformation using the Jacobian matrix, the dynamics in the
|
||||
Although this simplified model provides useful insights, real Stewart platforms exhibit more complex behaviors.
|
||||
Several factors can significantly increase the model complexity, such as:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Strut dynamics, including mass distribution and internal resonances~\cite{afzali-far16_inert_matrix_hexap_strut_joint_space,chen04_decoup_contr_flexur_joint_hexap}
|
||||
\item Strut dynamics, including mass distribution and internal resonances~\cite{chen04_decoup_contr_flexur_joint_hexap}
|
||||
\item Joint compliance and friction effects~\cite{mcinroy00_desig_contr_flexur_joint_hexap,mcinroy02_model_desig_flexur_joint_stewar}
|
||||
\item Supporting structure dynamics and payload dynamics, which are both very critical for NASS
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
@ -7372,7 +7372,7 @@ One way to overcome these limitations is to combine several sensors using a tech
|
||||
Fortunately, a wide variety of sensors exists, each with different characteristics.
|
||||
By carefully selecting the sensors to be fused, a ``super sensor'' is obtained that combines the benefits of the individual sensors.
|
||||
|
||||
In some applications, sensor fusion is employed to increase measurement bandwidth~\cite{shaw90_bandw_enhan_posit_measur_using_measur_accel,zimmermann92_high_bandw_orien_measur_contr,min15_compl_filter_desig_angle_estim}.
|
||||
In some applications, sensor fusion is employed to increase measurement bandwidth~\cite{shaw90_bandw_enhan_posit_measur_using_measur_accel,zimmermann92_high_bandw_orien_measur_contr}.
|
||||
For instance, in~\cite{shaw90_bandw_enhan_posit_measur_using_measur_accel}, the bandwidth of a position sensor is extended by fusing it with an accelerometer that provides high-frequency motion information.
|
||||
In other applications, sensor fusion is used to obtain an estimate of the measured quantity with reduced noise~\cite{hua05_low_ligo,hua04_polyp_fir_compl_filter_contr_system,plummer06_optim_compl_filter_their_applic_motion_measur,robert12_introd_random_signal_applied_kalman}.
|
||||
More recently, the fusion of sensors measuring different physical quantities has been proposed to enhance control properties~\cite{collette15_sensor_fusion_method_high_perfor,yong16_high_speed_vertic_posit_stage}.
|
||||
@ -7380,12 +7380,12 @@ In~\cite{collette15_sensor_fusion_method_high_perfor}, an inertial sensor used f
|
||||
|
||||
Beyond Stewart platforms, practical applications of sensor fusion are numerous.
|
||||
It is widely implemented for attitude estimation in autonomous vehicles such as unmanned aerial vehicles~\cite{baerveldt97_low_cost_low_weigh_attit,corke04_inert_visual_sensin_system_small_auton_helic,jensen13_basic_uas} and underwater vehicles~\cite{pascoal99_navig_system_desig_using_time,batista10_optim_posit_veloc_navig_filter_auton_vehic}.
|
||||
Sensor fusion offers significant benefits for high-performance positioning control as demonstrated in~\cite{shaw90_bandw_enhan_posit_measur_using_measur_accel,zimmermann92_high_bandw_orien_measur_contr,min15_compl_filter_desig_angle_estim,yong16_high_speed_vertic_posit_stage}.
|
||||
Sensor fusion offers significant benefits for high-performance positioning control as demonstrated in~\cite{shaw90_bandw_enhan_posit_measur_using_measur_accel,zimmermann92_high_bandw_orien_measur_contr,yong16_high_speed_vertic_posit_stage}.
|
||||
It has also been identified as a key technology for improving the performance of active vibration isolation systems~\cite{tjepkema12_sensor_fusion_activ_vibrat_isolat_precis_equip}.
|
||||
Emblematic examples include the isolation stages of gravitational wave detectors~\cite{collette15_sensor_fusion_method_high_perfor,heijningen18_low} such as those employed at LIGO~\cite{hua05_low_ligo,hua04_polyp_fir_compl_filter_contr_system} and Virgo~\cite{lucia18_low_frequen_optim_perfor_advan}.
|
||||
|
||||
Two principal methods are employed to perform sensor fusion: using complementary filters~\cite{anderson53_instr_approac_system_steer_comput} or using Kalman filtering~\cite{brown72_integ_navig_system_kalman_filter}.
|
||||
For sensor fusion applications, these methods share many relationships~\cite{brown72_integ_navig_system_kalman_filter,higgins75_compar_compl_kalman_filter,robert12_introd_random_signal_applied_kalman,fonseca15_compl}.
|
||||
For sensor fusion applications, these methods share many relationships~\cite{brown72_integ_navig_system_kalman_filter,higgins75_compar_compl_kalman_filter,robert12_introd_random_signal_applied_kalman,carreira15_compl_filter_desig_three_frequen_bands}.
|
||||
However, Kalman filtering requires assumptions about the probabilistic characteristics of sensor noise~\cite{robert12_introd_random_signal_applied_kalman}, whereas complementary filters do not impose such requirements.
|
||||
Furthermore, complementary filters offer advantages over Kalman filtering for sensor fusion through their general applicability, low computational cost~\cite{higgins75_compar_compl_kalman_filter}, and intuitive nature, as their effects can be readily interpreted in the frequency domain.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -7395,7 +7395,7 @@ While analog complementary filters remain in use today~\cite{yong16_high_speed_v
|
||||
|
||||
Various design methods have been developed to optimize complementary filters.
|
||||
The most straightforward approach is based on analytical formulas, which depending on the application may be first order~\cite{corke04_inert_visual_sensin_system_small_auton_helic,yeh05_model_contr_hydraul_actuat_two,yong16_high_speed_vertic_posit_stage}, second order~\cite{baerveldt97_low_cost_low_weigh_attit,stoten01_fusion_kinet_data_using_compos_filter,jensen13_basic_uas}, or higher orders~\cite{shaw90_bandw_enhan_posit_measur_using_measur_accel,zimmermann92_high_bandw_orien_measur_contr,stoten01_fusion_kinet_data_using_compos_filter,collette15_sensor_fusion_method_high_perfor,matichard15_seism_isolat_advan_ligo}.
|
||||
Since the characteristics of the super sensor depend on proper complementary filter design~\cite{dehaeze19_compl_filter_shapin_using_synth}, several optimization techniques have emerged—ranging from optimizing parameters for analytical formulas~\cite{jensen13_basic_uas,min15_compl_filter_desig_angle_estim,fonseca15_compl} to employing convex optimization tools~\cite{hua04_polyp_fir_compl_filter_contr_system,hua05_low_ligo} such as linear matrix inequalities~\cite{pascoal99_navig_system_desig_using_time}.
|
||||
Since the characteristics of the super sensor depend on proper complementary filter design~\cite{dehaeze19_compl_filter_shapin_using_synth}, several optimization techniques have emerged—ranging from optimizing parameters for analytical formulas~\cite{jensen13_basic_uas,carreira15_compl_filter_desig_three_frequen_bands} to employing convex optimization tools~\cite{hua04_polyp_fir_compl_filter_contr_system,hua05_low_ligo} such as linear matrix inequalities~\cite{pascoal99_navig_system_desig_using_time}.
|
||||
As demonstrated in~\cite{plummer06_optim_compl_filter_their_applic_motion_measur}, complementary filter design can be linked to the standard mixed-sensitivity control problem, allowing powerful classical control theory tools to be applied.
|
||||
For example, in~\cite{jensen13_basic_uas}, two gains of a Proportional Integral (PI) controller are optimized to minimize super sensor noise.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -7693,14 +7693,14 @@ This straightforward example demonstrates that the proposed methodology for shap
|
||||
\subsubsection{Synthesis of a set of three complementary filters}
|
||||
\label{ssec:detail_control_sensor_hinf_three_comp_filters}
|
||||
|
||||
Certain applications necessitate the fusion of more than two sensors~\cite{stoten01_fusion_kinet_data_using_compos_filter,fonseca15_compl}.
|
||||
Certain applications necessitate the fusion of more than two sensors~\cite{stoten01_fusion_kinet_data_using_compos_filter,carreira15_compl_filter_desig_three_frequen_bands}.
|
||||
At LIGO, for example, a super sensor is formed by merging three distinct sensors: an LVDT, a seismometer, and a geophone~\cite{matichard15_seism_isolat_advan_ligo}.
|
||||
|
||||
For merging \(n>2\) sensors with complementary filters, two architectural approaches are possible, as illustrated in Figure~\ref{fig:detail_control_sensor_fusion_three}.
|
||||
Fusion can be implemented either ``sequentially,'' using \(n-1\) sets of two complementary filters (Figure~\ref{fig:detail_control_sensor_fusion_three_sequential}), or ``in parallel,'' employing a single set of \(n\) complementary filters (Figure~\ref{fig:detail_control_sensor_fusion_three_parallel}).
|
||||
|
||||
While conventional sensor fusion synthesis techniques can be applied to the sequential approach, parallel architecture implementation requires a novel synthesis method for multiple complementary filters.
|
||||
Previous literature has offered only simple analytical formulas for this purpose~\cite{stoten01_fusion_kinet_data_using_compos_filter,fonseca15_compl}.
|
||||
Previous literature has offered only simple analytical formulas for this purpose~\cite{stoten01_fusion_kinet_data_using_compos_filter,carreira15_compl_filter_desig_three_frequen_bands}.
|
||||
This section presents a generalization of the proposed complementary filter synthesis method to address this gap.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[htbp]
|
||||
|
143
ref.bib
143
ref.bib
@ -1,34 +1,139 @@
|
||||
@inproceedings{dehaeze21_mechat_approac_devel_nano_activ_stabil_system,
|
||||
author = {Dehaeze, T. and Bonnefoy, J. and Collette, C.},
|
||||
title = {Mechatronics Approach for the Development of a Nano-Active-Stabilization-System},
|
||||
booktitle = {MEDSI'20},
|
||||
year = {2021},
|
||||
@inproceedings{dehaeze18_sampl_stabil_for_tomog_exper,
|
||||
author = {Dehaeze, T. and Magnin Mattenet, M. and Collette, C.},
|
||||
title = {Sample Stabilization For Tomography Experiments In Presence
|
||||
Of Large Plant Uncertainty},
|
||||
booktitle = {MEDSI'18},
|
||||
year = 2018,
|
||||
number = 10,
|
||||
pages = {153--157},
|
||||
doi = {10.18429/JACoW-MEDSI2018-WEOAMA02},
|
||||
url = {https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-MEDSI2018-WEOAMA02},
|
||||
address = {Geneva, Switzerland},
|
||||
isbn = {978-3-95450-207-3},
|
||||
language = {english},
|
||||
month = 12,
|
||||
publisher = {JACoW Publishing},
|
||||
series = {Mechanical Engineering Design of Synchrotron Radiation Equipment and Instrumentation},
|
||||
venue = {Chicago, USA},
|
||||
series = {Mechanical Engineering Design of Synchrotron Radiation
|
||||
Equipment and Instrumentation},
|
||||
venue = {Paris, France},
|
||||
keywords = {publication},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@inproceedings{brumund21_multib_simul_reduc_order_flexib_bodies_fea,
|
||||
author = {Philipp Brumund and Thomas Dehaeze},
|
||||
title = {Multibody Simulations with Reduced Order Flexible Bodies obtained by FEA},
|
||||
booktitle = {MEDSI'20},
|
||||
year = {2020},
|
||||
@inproceedings{dehaeze19_compl_filter_shapin_using_synth,
|
||||
author = {Dehaeze, T. and Verma, M. and Collette, C.},
|
||||
title = {Complementary Filters Shaping Using $\mathcal{H}_\infty$
|
||||
Synthesis},
|
||||
booktitle = {7th International Conference on Control, Mechatronics and
|
||||
Automation (ICCMA)},
|
||||
year = 2019,
|
||||
pages = {459--464},
|
||||
doi = {10.1109/ICCMA46720.2019.8988642},
|
||||
url = {https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCMA46720.2019.8988642},
|
||||
language = {english},
|
||||
publisher = {JACoW Publishing},
|
||||
series = {Mechanical Engineering Design of Synchrotron Radiation Equipment and Instrumentation},
|
||||
venue = {Chicago, USA},
|
||||
keywords = {publication},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@inproceedings{dehaeze20_activ_dampin_rotat_platf_integ_force_feedb,
|
||||
author = {Dehaeze, T. and Collette, C.},
|
||||
title = {Active Damping of Rotating Platforms using Integral Force
|
||||
Feedback},
|
||||
booktitle = {Proceedings of the International Conference on Modal
|
||||
Analysis Noise and Vibration Engineering (ISMA)},
|
||||
year = 2020,
|
||||
url =
|
||||
{https://past.isma-isaac.be/downloads/isma2020/proceedings/Contribution_304_proceeding_3.pdf},
|
||||
keywords = {publication},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{verma20_multi_degree_freed_isolat_system,
|
||||
author = {Verma, M. and Lafarga, V. and Dehaeze, T. and Collette, C.},
|
||||
title = {Multi-Degree of Freedom Isolation System With High
|
||||
Frequency Roll-Off for Drone Camera Stabilization},
|
||||
journal = {IEEE Access},
|
||||
year = 2020,
|
||||
doi = {10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3027066},
|
||||
url = {https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3027066},
|
||||
keywords = {publication},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{verma20_virtual_sensor_fusion_high_precis_contr,
|
||||
author = {Verma, M. and Dehaeze, T. and Zhao, G. and
|
||||
Watchi, J. and Collette, C.},
|
||||
title = {Virtual Sensor Fusion for High Precision Control},
|
||||
journal = {Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing},
|
||||
volume = 150,
|
||||
pages = 107241,
|
||||
year = 2020,
|
||||
doi = {10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107241},
|
||||
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107241},
|
||||
keywords = {publication},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{dehaeze21_activ_dampin_rotat_platf_using,
|
||||
author = {Thomas Dehaeze and Christophe Collette},
|
||||
title = {Active Damping of Rotating Platforms Using Integral Force Feedback},
|
||||
author = {Dehaeze, T. and Collette, C.},
|
||||
title = {Active Damping of Rotating Platforms Using Integral Force
|
||||
Feedback},
|
||||
journal = {Engineering Research Express},
|
||||
year = {2021},
|
||||
year = 2021,
|
||||
doi = {10.1088/2631-8695/abe803},
|
||||
url = {https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/abe803},
|
||||
month = {2},
|
||||
month = 2,
|
||||
keywords = {publication},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@inproceedings{brumund21_multib_simul_reduc_order_flexib_bodies_fea,
|
||||
author = {Brumund, P. and Dehaeze, T.},
|
||||
title = {{Multibody Simulations with Reduced Order Flexible Bodies
|
||||
Obtained by FEA}},
|
||||
booktitle = {Proc. MEDSI'20},
|
||||
year = 2021,
|
||||
number = 11,
|
||||
pages = 286,
|
||||
doi = {10.18429/JACoW-MEDSI2020-WEPB08},
|
||||
url = {https://jacow.org/medsi2020/papers/WEPB08.pdf},
|
||||
language = {english},
|
||||
paper = {WEPB08},
|
||||
publisher = {JACoW Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland},
|
||||
venue = {Chicago, USA, Jul. 2021},
|
||||
keywords = {publication},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@inproceedings{dehaeze21_mechat_approac_devel_nano_activ_stabil_system,
|
||||
author = {T. Dehaeze and J. Bonnefoy and G. R. L. Collette},
|
||||
title = {{Mechatronics Approach for the Development of a
|
||||
Nano-Active-Stabilization-System}},
|
||||
booktitle = {Proc. MEDSI'20},
|
||||
year = 2021,
|
||||
number = 11,
|
||||
pages = 93,
|
||||
doi = {10.18429/JACoW-MEDSI2020-TUIO02},
|
||||
url = {https://jacow.org/medsi2020/papers/TUIO02.pdf},
|
||||
language = {english},
|
||||
paper = {TUIO02},
|
||||
publisher = {JACoW Publishing, Geneva, Switzerland},
|
||||
venue = {Chicago, USA, Jul. 2021},
|
||||
keywords = {publication},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{tsang22_optim_sensor_fusion_method_activ,
|
||||
author = {Tsang, T. T. L. and Li, T. G. F. and Dehaeze, T. and Collette, C.},
|
||||
title = {Optimal Sensor Fusion Method for Active Vibration Isolation
|
||||
Systems in Ground-Based Gravitational-Wave Detectors},
|
||||
journal = {Classical and Quantum Gravity},
|
||||
volume = 39,
|
||||
number = 18,
|
||||
pages = 185007,
|
||||
year = 2022,
|
||||
doi = {10.1088/1361-6382/ac8780},
|
||||
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ac8780},
|
||||
keywords = {publication},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@inproceedings{dehaeze22_fastj_uhv,
|
||||
author = {Dehaeze, T. and Ducott{\'e}, L.},
|
||||
title = {The Fastjack - A robust, UHV compatible and high
|
||||
performance linear actuator},
|
||||
year = 2022,
|
||||
organization = {EUSPEN},
|
||||
keywords = {publication},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user