test-bench-vionic/test-bench-vionic.org

13 KiB

Encoder Renishaw Vionic - Test Bench


This report is also available as a pdf.


Introduction   ignore

You can find below the document of:

We would like to characterize the encoder measurement system.

In particular, we would like to measure:

  • Power Spectral Density of the measurement noise
  • Bandwidth of the sensor
  • Linearity of the sensor

/tdehaeze/test-bench-vionic/media/commit/53ffaaa793b1408518a3394b1000e3833792b28f/figs/encoder_vionic.png

  • 1: 2YA275
  • 2: 2YA274
  • 3: 2YA273
  • 4: 2YA270
  • 5: 2YA272
  • 6: 2YA271
  • 7: 2YJ313

Encoder Model

The Encoder is characterized by its dynamics $G_m(s)$ from the "true" displacement $y$ to measured displacement $y_m$. Ideally, this dynamics is constant over a wide frequency band with very small phase drop.

It is also characterized by its measurement noise $n$ that can be described by its Power Spectral Density (PSD).

The model of the encoder is shown in Figure fig:encoder-model-schematic.

  \begin{tikzpicture}
    \node[block] (G) at (0,0){$G_m(s)$};
    \node[addb, left=0.8 of G] (add){};

    \draw[<-] (add.west) -- ++(-1.0, 0) node[above right]{$y$};
    \draw[->] (add.east) -- (G.west);
    \draw[->] (G.east) -- ++(1.0, 0) node[above left]{$y_m$};
    \draw[<-] (add.north) -- ++(0, 0.6) node[below right](n){$n$};

    \begin{scope}[on background layer]
      \node[fit={(add.west|-G.south) (n.north-|G.east)}, inner sep=8pt, draw, dashed, fill=black!20!white] (P) {};
      \node[below left] at (P.north east) {Encoder};
    \end{scope}
  \end{tikzpicture}

/tdehaeze/test-bench-vionic/media/commit/53ffaaa793b1408518a3394b1000e3833792b28f/figs/encoder-model-schematic.png

Model of the Encoder

We can also use a transfer function $G_n(s)$ to shape a noise $\tilde{n}$ with unity ASD as shown in Figure fig:vionic_expected_noise.

  \begin{tikzpicture}
    \node[block] (G) at (0,0){$G_m(s)$};
    \node[addb, left=0.8 of G] (add){};
    \node[block, above=0.5 of add] (Gn) {$G_n(s)$};

    \draw[<-] (add.west) -- ++(-1.0, 0) node[above right]{$y$};
    \draw[->] (add.east) -- (G.west);
    \draw[->] (G.east) -- ++(1.0, 0) node[above left]{$y_m$};
    \draw[->] (Gn.south) -- (add.north) node[above right]{$n$};
    \draw[<-] (Gn.north) -- ++(0, 0.6) node[below right](n){$\tilde{n}$};

    \begin{scope}[on background layer]
      \node[fit={(Gn.west|-G.south) (n.north-|G.east)}, inner sep=8pt, draw, dashed, fill=black!20!white] (P) {};
      \node[below left] at (P.north east) {Encoder};
    \end{scope}
  \end{tikzpicture}

/tdehaeze/test-bench-vionic/media/commit/53ffaaa793b1408518a3394b1000e3833792b28f/figs/encoder-model-schematic-with-asd.png

Characteristics Manual Specifications
Range Ruler length > 200 [um]
Resolution 2.5 [nm] < 50 [nm rms]
Sub-Divisional Error $< \pm 15\,nm$
Bandwidth To be checked > 5 [kHz]
/tdehaeze/test-bench-vionic/media/commit/53ffaaa793b1408518a3394b1000e3833792b28f/figs/vionic_expected_noise.png
Expected interpolation errors for the Vionic Encoder

Noise Measurement

<<sec:noise_measurement>>

Test Bench

To measure the noise $n$ of the encoder, one can rigidly fix the head and the ruler together such that no motion should be measured. Then, the measured signal $y_m$ corresponds to the noise $n$.

Results

First we load the data.

%% Load Data
enc1 = load('noise_meas_100s_20kHz_1.mat', 't', 'x');
enc2 = load('noise_meas_100s_20kHz_2.mat', 't', 'x');
enc3 = load('noise_meas_100s_20kHz_3.mat', 't', 'x');
enc4 = load('noise_meas_100s_20kHz_4.mat', 't', 'x');
enc6 = load('noise_meas_100s_20kHz_6.mat', 't', 'x');
enc7 = load('noise_meas_100s_20kHz_7.mat', 't', 'x');

The raw measured data as well as the low pass filtered data (using a first order low pass filter with a cut-off at 10Hz) are shown in Figure fig:vionic_noise_raw_lpf.

/tdehaeze/test-bench-vionic/media/commit/53ffaaa793b1408518a3394b1000e3833792b28f/figs/vionic_noise_raw_lpf.png

Time domain measurement (raw data and low pass filtered data with first order 10Hz LPF)

The time domain data for all the encoders are compared in Figure fig:vionic_noise_time.

/tdehaeze/test-bench-vionic/media/commit/53ffaaa793b1408518a3394b1000e3833792b28f/figs/vionic_noise_time.png

Comparison of the time domain measurement

The amplitude spectral density is computed and shown in Figure fig:vionic_noise_asd.

/tdehaeze/test-bench-vionic/media/commit/53ffaaa793b1408518a3394b1000e3833792b28f/figs/vionic_noise_asd.png

Amplitude Spectral Density of the measured signal

Let's create a transfer function that approximate the measured noise of the encoder.

Gn_e = 1.8e-11/(1 + s/2/pi/1e4);

The amplitude of the transfer function and the measured ASD are shown in Figure fig:vionic_noise_asd_model.

/tdehaeze/test-bench-vionic/media/commit/53ffaaa793b1408518a3394b1000e3833792b28f/figs/vionic_noise_asd_model.png

Measured ASD of the noise and modelled one

Linearity Measurement

<<sec:linearity_measurement>>

Test Bench

In order to measure the linearity, we have to compare the measured displacement with a reference sensor with a known linearity. An interferometer or capacitive sensor should work fine. An actuator should also be there so impose a displacement.

One idea is to use the test-bench shown in Figure fig:test_bench_encoder_calibration.

The APA300ML is used to excite the mass in a broad bandwidth. The motion is measured at the same time by the Vionic Encoder and by an interferometer (most likely an Attocube).

As the interferometer has a very large bandwidth, we should be able to estimate the bandwidth of the encoder if it is less than the Nyquist frequency that can be around 10kHz.

/tdehaeze/test-bench-vionic/media/commit/53ffaaa793b1408518a3394b1000e3833792b28f/figs/test_bench_encoder_calibration.png
Schematic of the test bench

Results

Dynamical Measurement

<<sec:dynamical_measurement>>

Test Bench

Results