Remove the "lead" in the HAC
This commit is contained in:
parent
8d337688fb
commit
2c431f46d8
@ -13252,11 +13252,11 @@ This design choice, while beneficial for system simplicity, introduces inherent
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
A diagonal controller was designed to be robust against changes in payload mass, which means that every damped plant shown in Figure\nbsp{}ref:fig:test_id31_comp_all_undamped_damped_plants must be considered during the controller design.
|
A diagonal controller was designed to be robust against changes in payload mass, which means that every damped plant shown in Figure\nbsp{}ref:fig:test_id31_comp_all_undamped_damped_plants must be considered during the controller design.
|
||||||
For this controller design, a crossover frequency of $5\,\text{Hz}$ was chosen to limit the multivariable effects, as explain in Section\nbsp{}ref:sec:test_id31_hac_interaction_analysis.
|
For this controller design, a crossover frequency of $5\,\text{Hz}$ was chosen to limit the multivariable effects, as explain in Section\nbsp{}ref:sec:test_id31_hac_interaction_analysis.
|
||||||
One integrator is added to increase the low-frequency gain, a lead is added around $5\,\text{Hz}$ to increase the stability margins and a first-order low-pass filter with a cut-off frequency of $30\,\text{Hz}$ is added to improve the robustness to dynamical uncertainty at high-frequency.
|
One integrator is added to increase the low-frequency gain and a first-order low-pass filter with a cut-off frequency of $30\,\text{Hz}$ is added to improve the robustness to dynamical uncertainty at high-frequency.
|
||||||
The controller transfer function is shown in\nbsp{}eqref:eq:test_id31_robust_hac.
|
The controller transfer function is shown in\nbsp{}eqref:eq:test_id31_robust_hac.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{equation}\label{eq:test_id31_robust_hac}
|
\begin{equation}\label{eq:test_id31_robust_hac}
|
||||||
K_{\text{HAC}}(s) = g_0 \cdot \underbrace{\frac{\omega_c}{s}}_{\text{int}} \cdot \underbrace{\frac{1}{\sqrt{\alpha}}\frac{1 + \frac{s}{\omega_c/\sqrt{\alpha}}}{1 + \frac{s}{\omega_c\sqrt{\alpha}}}}_{\text{lead}} \cdot \underbrace{\frac{1}{1 + \frac{s}{\omega_0}}}_{\text{LPF}}, \quad \left( \omega_c = 2\pi5\,\text{rad/s},\ \alpha = 2,\ \omega_0 = 2\pi30\,\text{rad/s} \right)
|
K_{\text{HAC}}(s) = g_0 \cdot \underbrace{\frac{\omega_c}{s}}_{\text{int}} \cdot \underbrace{\frac{1}{1 + \frac{s}{\omega_0}}}_{\text{LPF}}, \quad \left( \omega_c = 2\pi5\,\text{rad/s},\ \omega_0 = 2\pi30\,\text{rad/s} \right)
|
||||||
\end{equation}
|
\end{equation}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The obtained "decentralized" loop-gains (i.e. the diagonal element of the controller times the diagonal terms of the plant) are shown in Figure\nbsp{}ref:fig:test_id31_hac_loop_gain.
|
The obtained "decentralized" loop-gains (i.e. the diagonal element of the controller times the diagonal terms of the plant) are shown in Figure\nbsp{}ref:fig:test_id31_hac_loop_gain.
|
||||||
@ -13332,7 +13332,7 @@ The multi-body model was first validated by comparing it with the measured frequ
|
|||||||
This validation confirmed that the model can be reliably used to tune the feedback controller and evaluate its performance.
|
This validation confirmed that the model can be reliably used to tune the feedback controller and evaluate its performance.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
An interaction analysis using the RGA-number was then performed, which revealed that higher payload masses lead to increased coupling when implementing control in the strut reference frame.
|
An interaction analysis using the RGA-number was then performed, which revealed that higher payload masses lead to increased coupling when implementing control in the strut reference frame.
|
||||||
Based on this analysis, a diagonal controller with a crossover frequency of $5\,\text{Hz}$ was designed, incorporating an integrator, a lead compensator, and a first-order low-pass filter.
|
Based on this analysis, a diagonal controller with a crossover frequency of $5\,\text{Hz}$ was designed, incorporating an integrator and a first-order low-pass filter.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Finally, tomography experiments were simulated to validate the acrshort:haclac architecture.
|
Finally, tomography experiments were simulated to validate the acrshort:haclac architecture.
|
||||||
The closed-loop system remained stable under all tested payload conditions (0 to $39\,\text{kg}$).
|
The closed-loop system remained stable under all tested payload conditions (0 to $39\,\text{kg}$).
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user