nass-micro-station-measurem.../modal-analysis/index.org

10 KiB

Modal Analysis

Goal

The goal is to experimentally extract a Spatial Model (mass, damping, stiffness) of the structure (shown on figure fig:nass_picture) in order to tune the Multi-Body model.

/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/nass_picture.png
Picture of the ID31 Micro-Station. (1) Granite (2) Translation Stage (3) Tilt Stage (4) Hexapod (5) Dummy Mass

The procedure is represented on figure fig:vibration_analysis_procedure where we go from left to right.

/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/vibration_analysis_procedure.png
Vibration Analysis Procedure

First, we obtain a Response Model (Frequency Response Functions) from measurements. This is further converted into a Modal Model (Natural Frequencies and Mode Shapes). Finally, this is converted into a Spatial Model with the Mass/Damping/Stiffness matrices.

Theses matrices will be used to tune the Simscape (multi-body) model.

The modes we want to identify are those in the frequency range between 0Hz and 150Hz.

Type of Model

The model that we want to obtain is a multi-body model. It is composed of several solid bodies connected with springs and dampers. The solid bodies are represented with different colors on figure fig:nass_solidworks.

In the simscape model, the solid bodies are:

  • the granite (1 or 2 solids)
  • the translation stage
  • the tilt stage
  • the spindle and slip-ring
  • the hexapod
/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/nass_solidworks.png
CAD view of the ID31 Micro-Station

However, each of the DOF of the system may not be relevant for the modes present in the frequency band of interest. For instance, the translation stage may not vibrate in the Z direction for all the modes identified. Then, we can block this DOF and this simplifies the model.

The modal identification done here will thus permit us to determine which DOF can be neglected.

Instrumentation Used

In order to perform to Modal Analysis and to obtain first a Response Model, the following devices are used:

/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/instrumentation/oros.png
Acquisition system: OROS

The acquisition system permits to auto-range the inputs (probably using variable gain amplifiers) the obtain the maximum dynamic range. This is done before each measurement. Anti-aliasing filters are also included in the system.

/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/instrumentation/accelero_M393B05.png
Accelerometer used: M393B05
Sensitivity 10V/g
Measurement Range 0.5 g pk
Broadband Resolution 0.000004 g rms
Frequency Range 0.7 to 450Hz
Resonance Frequency > 2.5kHz
393B05 Accelerometer Data Sheet

Tests have been conducted to determine the most suitable Hammer tip. This has been found that the softer tip gives the best results. It excites more the low frequency range where the coherence is low, the overall coherence was improved.

/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/instrumentation/instrumented_hammer.png
Instrumented Hammer
/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/instrumentation/hammer_tips.png
Hammer tips

The accelerometers are glued on the structure.

Structure Preparation and Test Planning

Structure Preparation

All the stages are turned ON. This is done for two reasons:

  • Be closer to the real dynamic of the station in used
  • If the control system of stages are turned OFF, this would results in very low frequency modes un-identifiable with the current setup, and this will also decouple the dynamics which would not be the case in practice

This is critical for the translation stage and the spindle as their is no stiffness in the free DOF (air-bearing for the spindle for instance).

The alternative would have been to mechanically block the stages with screws, but this may result in changing the modes.

The stages turned ON are:

  • Translation Stage
  • Tilt Stage
  • Spindle and Slip-Ring
  • Hexapod

The top part representing the NASS and the sample platform have been removed in order to reduce the complexity of the dynamics and also because this will be further added in the model inside Simscape.

All the stages are moved to their zero position (Ty, Ry, Rz, Slip-Ring, Hexapod).

All other elements have been remove from the granite such as another heavy positioning system.

Test Planing

The goal is to identify the full $N \times N$ FRF matrix (where $N$ is the number of degree of freedom of the system).

However, the principle of reciprocity states that: \[ H_{jk} = \frac{X_j}{F_k} = H_{kj} = \frac{X_k}{F_j} \] Thus, only one column or one line of the matrix has to be identified.

Either we choose to identify $\frac{X_k}{F_i}$ or $\frac{X_i}{F_k}$ for any chosen $k$ and for $i = 1,\ ...,\ N$.

We here choose to identify $\frac{X_i}{F_k}$ for practical reasons:

  • it is easier to glue the accelerometers on some stages than to excite this particular stage with the Hammer

The measurement thus consists of:

  • always excite the structure at the same location with the Hammer
  • Move the accelerometers to measure all the DOF of the structure

Location of the Accelerometers

4 tri-axis accelerometers are used for each solid body.

Only 2 could have been used as only 6DOF have to be measured, however, we have chosen to have some redundancy.

This could also help us identify measurement problems or flexible modes is present.

The position of the accelerometers are:

/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/accelerometers/accelerometers_granite2_overview.jpg
Accelerometers located on the top granite
/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/accelerometers/accelerometers_ty_overview.jpg
Accelerometers located on top of the translation stage
/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/accelerometers/accelerometers_hexa_overview.jpg
Accelerometers located on the Hexapod

Hammer Impacts

Only 3 impact points are used.

The impact points are shown on figures fig:hammer_x, fig:hammer_y and fig:hammer_z.

/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/impacts/hammer_x.gif
Hammer Blow in the X direction
/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/impacts/hammer_y.gif
Hammer Blow in the Y direction
/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/impacts/hammer_z.gif
Hammer Blow in the Z direction

Signal Processing

The measurements are averaged 10 times (figure fig:general_parameters) corresponding to 10 hammer impacts.

/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/parameters/general_parameters.jpg
General Acquisition Settings

Windowing is used on the force response signals.

A boxcar window (figure fig:window_force) is used for the force signal as once the impact on the structure is done, the measured signal is meaningless.

An exponential window (figure fig:window_response) is used for the response signal as we are measuring transient signals and most of the information is located at the beginning of the signal.

/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/parameters/window_force.jpg
Window used for the force signal
/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/parameters/window_response.jpg
Window used for the response signal

FRF and COH Results

Mode Shapes

/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/modes/mode1.gif
Mode 1
/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/modes/mode2.gif
Mode 2
/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/modes/mode3.gif
Mode 3
/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/modes/mode4.gif
Mode 4
/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/modes/mode5.gif
Mode 5
/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/modes/mode6.gif
Mode 6
/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/modes/mode7.gif
Mode 7
/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/modes/mode8.gif
Mode 8
/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/modes/mode9.gif
Mode 9
/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/modes/mode10.gif
Mode 10

Problem with AirLoc System

4 Airloc Levelers are used for the granite (figure fig:airloc).

/tdehaeze/nass-micro-station-measurements/media/commit/8a7cba6ea6c81630c56d14503d2d6704f96dd5bd/modal-analysis/img/airloc/IMG_20190618_155522.jpg
AirLoc used for the granite (2120-KSKC)

They are probably not well leveled so that could explain the first modes at 11Hz and 17Hz.

Spatial Mode Extraction