bibliography: => #+BIBLIOGRAPHY: here

This commit is contained in:
2021-05-02 22:18:30 +02:00
parent a79f30c4d8
commit dfdbe99a8d
127 changed files with 1076 additions and 1162 deletions

View File

@@ -17,9 +17,9 @@ There are two main technique for force sensors:
The choice between the two is usually based on whether the measurement is static (strain gauge) or dynamics (piezoelectric).
Main differences between the two are shown in Figure [1](#org921c881).
Main differences between the two are shown in Figure [1](#orgd4cde6e).
<a id="org921c881"></a>
<a id="orgd4cde6e"></a>
{{< figure src="/ox-hugo/force_sensor_piezo_vs_strain_gauge.png" caption="Figure 1: Piezoelectric Force sensor VS Strain Gauge Force sensor" >}}
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Main differences between the two are shown in Figure [1](#org921c881).
### Dynamics and Noise of a piezoelectric force sensor {#dynamics-and-noise-of-a-piezoelectric-force-sensor}
An analysis the dynamics and noise of a piezoelectric force sensor is done in ([Fleming 2010](#org26fffc0)) ([Notes]({{< relref "fleming10_nanop_system_with_force_feedb" >}})).
An analysis the dynamics and noise of a piezoelectric force sensor is done in ([Fleming 2010](#org6f75dec)) ([Notes]({{< relref "fleming10_nanop_system_with_force_feedb" >}})).
### Manufacturers {#manufacturers}
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ However, if a charge conditioner is used, the signal will be doubled.
| [Althen](https://www.althensensors.com/sensors/weighing-sensors-load-cells/) | Netherlands |
## Bibliography {#bibliography}
<a id="org26fffc0"></a>Fleming, A.J. 2010. “Nanopositioning System with Force Feedback for High-Performance Tracking and Vibration Control.” _IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics_ 15 (3):43347. <https://doi.org/10.1109/tmech.2009.2028422>.
<a id="org6f75dec"></a>Fleming, A.J. 2010. “Nanopositioning System with Force Feedback for High-Performance Tracking and Vibration Control.” _IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics_ 15 (3):43347. <https://doi.org/10.1109/tmech.2009.2028422>.