Update Content - 2024-12-17

This commit is contained in:
2024-12-17 15:37:17 +01:00
parent 4d585dd592
commit 4fb2b6c969
86 changed files with 1314 additions and 711 deletions

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ There are two main technique for force sensors:
The choice between the two is usually based on whether the measurement is static (strain gauge) or dynamics (piezoelectric).
Main differences between the two are shown in Figure [1](#figure--fig:force-sensor-piezo-vs-strain-gauge).
Main differences between the two are shown in [Figure 1](#figure--fig:force-sensor-piezo-vs-strain-gauge).
<a id="figure--fig:force-sensor-piezo-vs-strain-gauge"></a>
@@ -79,5 +79,5 @@ However, if a charge conditioner is used, the signal will be doubled.
## Bibliography {#bibliography}
<style>.csl-entry{text-indent: -1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em;}</style><div class="csl-bib-body">
<div class="csl-entry"><a id="citeproc_bib_item_1"></a>Fleming, A.J. 2010. “Nanopositioning System with Force Feedback for High-Performance Tracking and Vibration Control.” <i>Ieee/Asme Transactions on Mechatronics</i> 15 (3): 43347. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/tmech.2009.2028422">10.1109/tmech.2009.2028422</a>.</div>
<div class="csl-entry"><a id="citeproc_bib_item_1"></a>Fleming, A.J. 2010. “Nanopositioning System with Force Feedback for High-Performance Tracking and Vibration Control.” <i>IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics</i> 15 (3): 43347. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/tmech.2009.2028422">10.1109/tmech.2009.2028422</a>.</div>
</div>