84 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
84 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
|
+++
|
||
|
|
title = "Time Delay"
|
||
|
|
author = ["Dehaeze Thomas"]
|
||
|
|
draft = false
|
||
|
|
+++
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Tags
|
||
|
|
:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Phase induced by a time delay {#phase-induced-by-a-time-delay}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Having some time delay can be modelled by a transfer function having constant amplitude but a phase lag increasing with frequency.
|
||
|
|
Such phase lag is linearly proportional to the time delay and to the frequency:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
\begin{equation}
|
||
|
|
\phi(\omega) = -\omega \cdot T\_s
|
||
|
|
\end{equation}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
with:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- \\(\phi(\omega)\\) the phase lag in rad
|
||
|
|
- \\(\omega\\) the frequency in rad/s
|
||
|
|
- \\(T\_s\\) the time delay in s
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Estimation of phase delay induced in sampled systems {#estimation-of-phase-delay-induced-in-sampled-systems}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Consider a feedback controller implemented numerically on a system with a sampling frequency \\(F\_s\\).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The time delay associated with the limited sampling frequency \\(F\_s\\) is:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
\begin{equation}
|
||
|
|
\phi(\omega) = -\frac{\omega}{F\_s}
|
||
|
|
\end{equation}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
with:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- \\(\phi(\omega)\\) the phase lag in rad
|
||
|
|
- \\(\omega\\) the frequency in rad/s
|
||
|
|
- \\(F\_s\\) the sampling frequency in Hz
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Some values are summarized in Table [1](#table--tab:time-delay-phase-lag).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<a id="table--tab:time-delay-phase-lag"></a>
|
||
|
|
<div class="table-caption">
|
||
|
|
<span class="table-number"><a href="#table--tab:time-delay-phase-lag">Table 1</a>:</span>
|
||
|
|
Phase lag as a function of the frequency (relative to the sampling frequency )
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
| Frequency | Phase Delay [deg] |
|
||
|
|
|----------------|-------------------|
|
||
|
|
| \\(F\_s/100\\) | -3.6 |
|
||
|
|
| \\(F\_s/10\\) | -36.0 |
|
||
|
|
| \\(F\_s/2\\) | -180.0 |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
This is the main reason to have a sampling frequency much higher than the wanted feedback bandwidth is to limit the phase delay at the crossover frequency induced by the time delay.
|
||
|
|
Having a sampling frequency a 100 times larger than the crossover frequency is a good objective.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<div class="exampl">
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Take the example of a controller implemented with a sampling time of 0.1ms (10kHz sampling frequency).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
```matlab
|
||
|
|
t_delay = 1e-4; % Delay [s]
|
||
|
|
G_delay = exp(-t_delay*s);
|
||
|
|
```
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The induced phase delay as a function of frequency is shown in Figure [1](#figure--fig:time-delay-induced-phase-lag).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
At the Nyquist frequency (5 kHz), the phase lag is 180 degrees.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<a id="figure--fig:time-delay-induced-phase-lag"></a>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
{{< figure src="/ox-hugo/time_delay_induced_phase_lag.png" caption="<span class=\"figure-number\">Figure 1: </span>Phase lag induced by a time delay" >}}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
</div>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Bibliography {#bibliography}
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
<style>.csl-entry{text-indent: -1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em;}</style><div class="csl-bib-body">
|
||
|
|
</div>
|