tdehaeze/phd-test-bench-apa
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Correct missing references

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Dehaeze 2024-03-23 11:10:15 +01:00
parent 5698fcd6f5
commit 64e0ae7494
3 changed files with 41 additions and 44 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

43
test-bench-apa.org
View File

@ -110,9 +110,9 @@ Prefix for figures/section/tables =test_apa=
- Dynamical measurements (Section 3)
- Simscape Model (Section 4)
** TODO [#B] Add sitffness of APA shell from FEM
** TODO [#C] Add sitffness of APA shell from FEM :@philipp:
** TODO [#B] Check things about resistor in parallel with the force sensor
** TODO [#C] Check things about resistor in parallel with the force sensor
Verify that everything interesting to say about that is either done before in the thesis or in this report.
@ -130,8 +130,7 @@ The first goal is to characterize the APA300ML in terms of:
- The dynamics from the generated DAC voltage (going to the voltage amplifiers and then applied on the actuator stacks) to the induced displacement, and to the measured voltage by the force sensor stack.
Also the "actuator constant" and "sensor constant" are identified.
This is done in Section ref:sec:test_apa_dynamics.
- Compare the measurements with the Simscape models (2DoF, Super-Element) in order to tuned/validate the models.
This is explained in Section ref:sec:test_apa_simscape.
- Compare the measurements with the two Simscape models: 2DoF (Section ref:sec:test_apa_model_2dof) Super-Element (Section ref:sec:test_apa_model_flexible)
#+name: tab:test_apa_section_matlab_code
#+caption: Report sections and corresponding Matlab files
@ -153,10 +152,10 @@ The first goal is to characterize the APA300ML in terms of:
** Introduction :ignore:
Before using the measurement bench to characterize the APA300ML, first simple measurements are performed:
- Section ref:sec:test_apa_geometrical_measurements: the geometric tolerances of the interface planes are checked
- Section ref:sec:test_apa_electrical_measurements: the capacitance of the piezoelectric stacks is measured
- Section ref:sec:test_apa_stroke_measurements: the stroke of each APA is measured
- Section ref:sec:test_apa_spurious_resonances: the "spurious" resonances of the APA are investigated
- Section ref:ssec:test_apa_geometrical_measurements: the geometric tolerances of the interface planes are checked
- Section ref:ssec:test_apa_electrical_measurements: the capacitance of the piezoelectric stacks is measured
- Section ref:ssec:test_apa_stroke_measurements: the stroke of each APA is measured
- Section ref:ssec:test_apa_spurious_resonances: the "spurious" resonances of the APA are investigated
** Matlab Init :noexport:ignore:
#+begin_src matlab :tangle no :exports none :results silent :noweb yes :var current_dir=(file-name-directory buffer-file-name)
@ -180,7 +179,7 @@ Before using the measurement bench to characterize the APA300ML, first simple me
#+end_src
** Geometrical Measurements
<<sec:test_apa_geometrical_measurements>>
<<ssec:test_apa_geometrical_measurements>>
To measure the flatness of the two mechanical interfaces of the APA300ML, a small measurement bench is installed on top of a metrology granite with very good flatness.
@ -252,7 +251,7 @@ data2orgtable(1e6*apa_d', {'APA 1', 'APA 2', 'APA 3', 'APA 4', 'APA 5', 'APA 6',
| APA 7 | 18.7 |
** Electrical Measurements
<<sec:test_apa_electrical_measurements>>
<<ssec:test_apa_electrical_measurements>>
From the documentation of the APA300ML, the total capacitance of the three stacks should be between $18\,\mu F$ and $26\,\mu F$ with a nominal capacitance of $20\,\mu F$.
@ -286,7 +285,7 @@ This may be due to the fact that the manufacturer measures the capacitance with
| APA 7 | 4.85 | 9.85 |
** Stroke and Hysteresis Measurement
<<sec:test_apa_stroke_measurements>>
<<ssec:test_apa_stroke_measurements>>
The goal is here to verify that the stroke of the APA300ML is as specified in the datasheet.
To do so, one side of the APA is fixed to the granite, and a displacement probe[fn:2] is located on the other side as shown in Figure ref:fig:test_apa_stroke_bench.
@ -306,7 +305,7 @@ The measured stroke is approximately $250\,\mu m$ when using only two of the thr
This is even above what is specified as the nominal stroke in the data-sheet ($304\,\mu m$, therefore $\approx 200\,\mu m$ if only two stacks are used).
It is clear from Figure ref:fig:test_apa_stroke_result that "APA 3" has an issue compared to the other units.
This confirms the abnormal electrical measurements made in Section ref:sec:test_apa_electrical_measurements.
This confirms the abnormal electrical measurements made in Section ref:ssec:test_apa_electrical_measurements.
This unit was send sent back to Cedrat and a new one was shipped back.
From now on, only the six APA that behave as expected will be used.
@ -348,8 +347,7 @@ exportFig('figs/test_apa_stroke_result.pdf', 'width', 'full', 'height', 'normal'
[[file:figs/test_apa_stroke_result.png]]
** Flexible Mode Measurement
SCHEDULED: <2024-03-27 Wed>
<<sec:test_apa_spurious_resonances>>
<<ssec:test_apa_spurious_resonances>>
In this section, the flexible modes of the APA300ML are investigated both experimentally and using a Finite Element Model.
@ -513,10 +511,12 @@ The bench is schematically shown in Figure ref:fig:test_apa_schematic and the si
| $d_e$ | Encoder Measurement | $m$ |
This bench will be used to:
- measure the dynamics of the APA (from $V_a$ to $d_e$ and $d_a$ in Section ref:ssec:test_apa_meas_frf_disp, and from $V_a$ to $V_s$ in section ref:ssec:test_apa_meas_frf_force)
- ref:ssec:test_apa_hysteresis
- ref:ssec:test_apa_stiffness
- measure the dynamics of the APA (section ref:ssec:test_apa_meas_dynamics)
- estimate the added damping using Integral Force Feedback (Section ref:ssec:test_apa_iff_locus)
These measurements will also be used to tune the model of the APA in Section ref:sec:test_apa_simscape.
These measurements will also be used to tune the developed models of the APA (in Section ref:sec:test_apa_model_2dof for the 2DoF model, and in Section ref:sec:test_apa_model_flexible for the flexible model).
** Matlab Init :noexport:ignore:
#+begin_src matlab :tangle no :exports none :results silent :noweb yes :var current_dir=(file-name-directory buffer-file-name)
@ -1182,7 +1182,7 @@ exportFig('figs/test_apa_iff_root_locus.pdf', 'width', 'wide', 'height', 'tall')
So far, all the measured FRF are showing the dynamical behavior that was expected.
#+end_important
* 2 Degrees of Freedom Model
* APA300ML - 2 Degrees of Freedom Model
:PROPERTIES:
:header-args:matlab+: :tangle matlab/test_apa_3_model_2dof.m
:END:
@ -1191,11 +1191,9 @@ So far, all the measured FRF are showing the dynamical behavior that was expecte
** Introduction :ignore:
In this section, a simscape model (Figure ref:fig:test_apa_bench_model) of the measurement bench is used to compare the model of the APA with the measured frequency response functions.
After the transfer functions are extracted from the model (Section ref:sec:simscape_bench_apa_first_id), the comparison of the obtained dynamics with the measured FRF will permit to:
1. Estimate the "actuator constant" and "sensor constant" (Section ref:sec:simscape_bench_apa_id_constants)
- "Actuator constant": Gain from the applied voltage $V_a$ to the generated Force $F_a$
- "Sensor constant": Gain from the sensor stack strain $\delta L$ to the generated voltage $V_s$
2. Tune the model of the APA to match the measured dynamics (Section ref:sec:simscape_bench_apa_tune_2dof_model)
A 2 degrees of freedom model is used to model the APA300ML.
This model is presented in Section ref:ssec:test_apa_2dof_model and the procedure to tuned the model is described in Section ref:ssec:test_apa_2dof_model_tuning.
The obtained model dynamics is compared with the measurements in Section ref:ssec:test_apa_2dof_model_result.
#+name: fig:test_apa_bench_model
#+caption: Screenshot of the Simscape model
@ -1620,6 +1618,7 @@ ga = d33*n*ka; % Actuator Constant [N/V]
#+end_src
** Comparison of the obtained dynamics
<<ssec:test_apa_flexible_comp_frf>>
The obtained dynamics using the /super element/ with the tuned "sensor gain" and "actuator gain" are compared with the experimentally identified frequency response functions in Figure ref:fig:test_apa_super_element_comp_frf.

BIN
test-bench-apa.pdf
View File

Binary file not shown.

42
test-bench-apa.tex
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
% Created 2024-03-22 Fri 19:12
% Created 2024-03-23 Sat 11:09
% Intended LaTeX compiler: pdflatex
\documentclass[a4paper, 10pt, DIV=12, parskip=full, bibliography=totoc]{scrreprt}
@ -35,8 +35,7 @@ This is performed in Section \ref{sec:test_apa_basic_meas}.
\item The dynamics from the generated DAC voltage (going to the voltage amplifiers and then applied on the actuator stacks) to the induced displacement, and to the measured voltage by the force sensor stack.
Also the ``actuator constant'' and ``sensor constant'' are identified.
This is done in Section \ref{sec:test_apa_dynamics}.
\item Compare the measurements with the Simscape models (2DoF, Super-Element) in order to tuned/validate the models.
This is explained in Section \ref{sec:test_apa_simscape}.
\item Compare the measurements with the two Simscape models: 2DoF (Section \ref{sec:test_apa_model_2dof}) Super-Element (Section \ref{sec:test_apa_model_flexible})
\end{itemize}
\begin{table}[htbp]
@ -58,13 +57,13 @@ Section \ref{sec:test_apa_model_flexible} & \texttt{test\_apa\_4\_model\_flexibl
Before using the measurement bench to characterize the APA300ML, first simple measurements are performed:
\begin{itemize}
\item Section \ref{sec:test_apa_geometrical_measurements}: the geometric tolerances of the interface planes are checked
\item Section \ref{sec:test_apa_electrical_measurements}: the capacitance of the piezoelectric stacks is measured
\item Section \ref{sec:test_apa_stroke_measurements}: the stroke of each APA is measured
\item Section \ref{sec:test_apa_spurious_resonances}: the ``spurious'' resonances of the APA are investigated
\item Section \ref{ssec:test_apa_geometrical_measurements}: the geometric tolerances of the interface planes are checked
\item Section \ref{ssec:test_apa_electrical_measurements}: the capacitance of the piezoelectric stacks is measured
\item Section \ref{ssec:test_apa_stroke_measurements}: the stroke of each APA is measured
\item Section \ref{ssec:test_apa_spurious_resonances}: the ``spurious'' resonances of the APA are investigated
\end{itemize}
\section{Geometrical Measurements}
\label{sec:test_apa_geometrical_measurements}
\label{ssec:test_apa_geometrical_measurements}
To measure the flatness of the two mechanical interfaces of the APA300ML, a small measurement bench is installed on top of a metrology granite with very good flatness.
@ -98,7 +97,7 @@ APA 7 & 18.7\\
\end{tabularx}
\end{table}
\section{Electrical Measurements}
\label{sec:test_apa_electrical_measurements}
\label{ssec:test_apa_electrical_measurements}
From the documentation of the APA300ML, the total capacitance of the three stacks should be between \(18\,\mu F\) and \(26\,\mu F\) with a nominal capacitance of \(20\,\mu F\).
@ -136,7 +135,7 @@ APA 7 & 4.85 & 9.85\\
\end{tabularx}
\end{table}
\section{Stroke and Hysteresis Measurement}
\label{sec:test_apa_stroke_measurements}
\label{ssec:test_apa_stroke_measurements}
The goal is here to verify that the stroke of the APA300ML is as specified in the datasheet.
To do so, one side of the APA is fixed to the granite, and a displacement probe\footnote{Millimar 1318 probe, specified linearity better than \(1\,\mu m\)} is located on the other side as shown in Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_stroke_bench}.
@ -157,7 +156,7 @@ The measured stroke is approximately \(250\,\mu m\) when using only two of the t
This is even above what is specified as the nominal stroke in the data-sheet (\(304\,\mu m\), therefore \(\approx 200\,\mu m\) if only two stacks are used).
It is clear from Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_stroke_result} that ``APA 3'' has an issue compared to the other units.
This confirms the abnormal electrical measurements made in Section \ref{sec:test_apa_electrical_measurements}.
This confirms the abnormal electrical measurements made in Section \ref{ssec:test_apa_electrical_measurements}.
This unit was send sent back to Cedrat and a new one was shipped back.
From now on, only the six APA that behave as expected will be used.
@ -167,7 +166,7 @@ From now on, only the six APA that behave as expected will be used.
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_stroke_result}Generated voltage across the two piezoelectric stack actuators to estimate the stroke of the APA300ML (left). Measured displacement as a function of the applied voltage (right)}
\end{figure}
\section{Flexible Mode Measurement}
\label{sec:test_apa_spurious_resonances}
\label{ssec:test_apa_spurious_resonances}
In this section, the flexible modes of the APA300ML are investigated both experimentally and using a Finite Element Model.
@ -282,11 +281,13 @@ The bench is schematically shown in Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_schematic} and the
This bench will be used to:
\begin{itemize}
\item measure the dynamics of the APA (from \(V_a\) to \(d_e\) and \(d_a\) in Section \ref{ssec:test_apa_meas_frf_disp}, and from \(V_a\) to \(V_s\) in section \ref{ssec:test_apa_meas_frf_force})
\item \ref{ssec:test_apa_hysteresis}
\item \ref{ssec:test_apa_stiffness}
\item measure the dynamics of the APA (section \ref{ssec:test_apa_meas_dynamics})
\item estimate the added damping using Integral Force Feedback (Section \ref{ssec:test_apa_iff_locus})
\end{itemize}
These measurements will also be used to tune the model of the APA in Section \ref{sec:test_apa_simscape}.
These measurements will also be used to tune the developed models of the APA (in Section \ref{sec:test_apa_model_2dof} for the 2DoF model, and in Section \ref{sec:test_apa_model_flexible} for the flexible model).
\section{Hysteresis}
\label{ssec:test_apa_hysteresis}
@ -485,18 +486,14 @@ The two obtained root loci are compared in Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_iff_root_loc
\begin{important}
So far, all the measured FRF are showing the dynamical behavior that was expected.
\end{important}
\chapter{2 Degrees of Freedom Model}
\chapter{APA300ML - 2 Degrees of Freedom Model}
\label{sec:test_apa_model_2dof}
In this section, a simscape model (Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_bench_model}) of the measurement bench is used to compare the model of the APA with the measured frequency response functions.
After the transfer functions are extracted from the model (Section \ref{sec:simscape_bench_apa_first_id}), the comparison of the obtained dynamics with the measured FRF will permit to:
\begin{enumerate}
\item Estimate the ``actuator constant'' and ``sensor constant'' (Section \ref{sec:simscape_bench_apa_id_constants})
\item ``Actuator constant'': Gain from the applied voltage \(V_a\) to the generated Force \(F_a\)
\item ``Sensor constant'': Gain from the sensor stack strain \(\delta L\) to the generated voltage \(V_s\)
\item Tune the model of the APA to match the measured dynamics (Section \ref{sec:simscape_bench_apa_tune_2dof_model})
\end{enumerate}
A 2 degrees of freedom model is used to model the APA300ML.
This model is presented in Section \ref{ssec:test_apa_2dof_model} and the procedure to tuned the model is described in Section \ref{ssec:test_apa_2dof_model_tuning}.
The obtained model dynamics is compared with the measurements in Section \ref{ssec:test_apa_2dof_model_result}.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\centering
@ -667,6 +664,7 @@ From these parameters, \(g_s = 5.1\,V/\mu m\) and \(g_a = 26\,N/V\) were obtaine
\end{tabularx}
\end{table}
\section{Comparison of the obtained dynamics}
\label{ssec:test_apa_flexible_comp_frf}
The obtained dynamics using the \emph{super element} with the tuned ``sensor gain'' and ``actuator gain'' are compared with the experimentally identified frequency response functions in Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_super_element_comp_frf}.