Finish first report version
This commit is contained in:
parent
7bb02c89c2
commit
07eaeefa9b
@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@book{fleming14_desig_model_contr_nanop_system,
|
@book{fleming14_desig_model_contr_nanop_system,
|
||||||
author = {Andrew J. Fleming and Kam K. Leang},
|
author = {Andrew J. Fleming and Kam K. Leang},
|
||||||
title = {Design, Modeling and Control of Nanopositioning Systems},
|
title = {Design, Modeling and Control of Nanopositioning Systems},
|
||||||
|
@ -109,12 +109,15 @@ CLOSED: [2024-04-02 Tue 10:17] SCHEDULED: <2024-04-02 Tue>
|
|||||||
** DONE [#C] Add sitffness of APA shell from FEM :@philipp:
|
** DONE [#C] Add sitffness of APA shell from FEM :@philipp:
|
||||||
CLOSED: [2024-04-02 Tue 10:01]
|
CLOSED: [2024-04-02 Tue 10:01]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
** TODO [#C] Check things about resistor in parallel with the force sensor
|
** DONE [#C] Check things about resistor in parallel with the force sensor
|
||||||
|
CLOSED: [2024-04-04 Thu 10:42]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Verify that everything interesting to say about that is either done before in the thesis or in this report.
|
Verify that everything interesting to say about that is either done before in the thesis or in this report.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
** TODO [#B] A lieu d'identifier le plant et de tracer sur le root locus, tracer le plant dampé depuis le modèle et comparer a la mesure
|
** CANC [#B] A lieu d'identifier le plant et de tracer sur le root locus, tracer le plant dampé depuis le modèle et comparer a la mesure
|
||||||
|
CLOSED: [2024-04-04 Thu 10:42]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- State "CANC" from "TODO" [2024-04-04 Thu 10:42]
|
||||||
* Introduction :ignore:
|
* Introduction :ignore:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In this chapter, the goal is to make sure that the received APA300ML (shown in Figure ref:fig:test_apa_received) are complying with the requirements and that dynamical models of the actuator are well representing its dynamics.
|
In this chapter, the goal is to make sure that the received APA300ML (shown in Figure ref:fig:test_apa_received) are complying with the requirements and that dynamical models of the actuator are well representing its dynamics.
|
||||||
@ -1861,16 +1864,25 @@ exportFig('figs/test_apa_super_element_comp_frf_force.pdf', 'width', 'half', 'he
|
|||||||
* Conclusion
|
* Conclusion
|
||||||
<<sec:test_apa_conclusion>>
|
<<sec:test_apa_conclusion>>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The main characteristics of the APA300ML such as hysteresis and axial stiffness have been measured and were found to comply with the specifications.
|
In this study, the received amplified piezoelectric actuators "APA300ML" have been characterized to make sure they are fulfilling all the requirements determined during the detailed design phase.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The dynamics of the received APA were measured and found to all be identical (Figure ref:fig:test_apa_frf_dynamics).
|
Geometrical features such as the flatness of its interfaces, electrical capacitance and achievable strokes were measured in Section ref:sec:test_apa_basic_meas.
|
||||||
Even tough a non-minimum zero was observed on the transfer function from $u$ to $V_s$ (Figure ref:fig:test_apa_non_minimum_phase), it was not found to be problematic as large amount of damping could be added using the integral force feedback strategy (Figure ref:fig:test_apa_iff).
|
These simple measurements allowed for early detection of a manufacturing defect in one of the APA300ML.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Then in Section ref:sec:test_apa_dynamics, using a dedicated test bench, the dynamics of all the APA300ML were measured and were found to all match very well (Figure ref:fig:test_apa_frf_dynamics).
|
||||||
|
This consistency indicates good manufacturing tolerances, facilitating the modeling and control of the nano-hexapod.
|
||||||
|
Although a non-minimum zero was identified in the transfer function from $u$ to $V_s$ (Figure ref:fig:test_apa_non_minimum_phase), it was found not to be problematic as large amount of damping could be added using the integral force feedback strategy (Figure ref:fig:test_apa_iff).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Then, two different models were used to represent the APA300ML dynamics.
|
||||||
|
In Section ref:sec:test_apa_model_2dof, a simple two degrees of freedom mass-spring-damper model was presented and tuned based on the measured dynamics.
|
||||||
|
After following a tuning procedure (see Section ref:ssec:test_apa_2dof_model_tuning), the model dynamics was shown to match very well with the experiment.
|
||||||
|
However, it is important to note that this model only represents the axial dynamics of the actuators, assuming infinite stiffness in other directions.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Compare 2DoF and FEM models (usefulness of the two)
|
In Section ref:sec:test_apa_model_flexible, a /super element/ extracted from a finite element model was used to model the APA300ML.
|
||||||
- Good match between all the APA: will simplify the modeling and control of the nano-hexapod
|
This time, the /super element/ represents the dynamics of the APA300ML in all directions.
|
||||||
- No advantage of the FEM model here (as only uniaxial behavior is checked), but may be useful later
|
However, only the axial dynamics could be compared with the experimental results yielding a good match.
|
||||||
|
The benefit of employing this model over the two degrees of freedom model is not immediately apparent due to its increased complexity and the larger number of model states involved.
|
||||||
|
Nonetheless, the /super element/ model's value will become clear in subsequent sections, when its capacity to accurately model the APA300ML's flexibility across various directions will be important.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* Bibliography :ignore:
|
* Bibliography :ignore:
|
||||||
#+latex: \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc,title={Bibliography}]
|
#+latex: \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc,title={Bibliography}]
|
||||||
@ -2022,8 +2034,6 @@ if args.Ga == 0
|
|||||||
switch args.type
|
switch args.type
|
||||||
case '2dof'
|
case '2dof'
|
||||||
actuator.Ga = -2.5796;
|
actuator.Ga = -2.5796;
|
||||||
case 'flexible frame'
|
|
||||||
actuator.Ga = 1; % TODO
|
|
||||||
case 'flexible'
|
case 'flexible'
|
||||||
actuator.Ga = 23.2;
|
actuator.Ga = 23.2;
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
@ -2037,8 +2047,6 @@ if args.Gs == 0
|
|||||||
switch args.type
|
switch args.type
|
||||||
case '2dof'
|
case '2dof'
|
||||||
actuator.Gs = 466664;
|
actuator.Gs = 466664;
|
||||||
case 'flexible frame'
|
|
||||||
actuator.Gs = 1; % TODO
|
|
||||||
case 'flexible'
|
case 'flexible'
|
||||||
actuator.Gs = -4898341;
|
actuator.Gs = -4898341;
|
||||||
end
|
end
|
||||||
|
Binary file not shown.
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||||||
% Created 2024-04-03 Wed 18:15
|
% Created 2024-04-04 Thu 11:14
|
||||||
% Intended LaTeX compiler: pdflatex
|
% Intended LaTeX compiler: pdflatex
|
||||||
\documentclass[a4paper, 10pt, DIV=12, parskip=full, bibliography=totoc]{scrreprt}
|
\documentclass[a4paper, 10pt, DIV=12, parskip=full, bibliography=totoc]{scrreprt}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ Section \ref{sec:test_apa_model_flexible} & \texttt{test\_apa\_4\_model\_flexibl
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
\end{table}
|
\end{table}
|
||||||
\chapter{First Basic Measurements}
|
\chapter{First Basic Measurements}
|
||||||
\label{sec:org399d3a7}
|
\label{sec:org228596b}
|
||||||
\label{sec:test_apa_basic_meas}
|
\label{sec:test_apa_basic_meas}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Before measuring the dynamical characteristics of the APA300ML, first simple measurements are performed.
|
Before measuring the dynamical characteristics of the APA300ML, first simple measurements are performed.
|
||||||
@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Then, the capacitance of the piezoelectric stacks is measured in Section \ref{ss
|
|||||||
The achievable stroke of the APA300ML is measured using a displacement probe in Section \ref{ssec:test_apa_stroke_measurements}.
|
The achievable stroke of the APA300ML is measured using a displacement probe in Section \ref{ssec:test_apa_stroke_measurements}.
|
||||||
Finally, in Section \ref{ssec:test_apa_spurious_resonances}, the flexible modes of the APA are measured and compared with a finite element model.
|
Finally, in Section \ref{ssec:test_apa_spurious_resonances}, the flexible modes of the APA are measured and compared with a finite element model.
|
||||||
\section{Geometrical Measurements}
|
\section{Geometrical Measurements}
|
||||||
\label{sec:org9db80da}
|
\label{sec:org726c24d}
|
||||||
\label{ssec:test_apa_geometrical_measurements}
|
\label{ssec:test_apa_geometrical_measurements}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To measure the flatness of the two mechanical interfaces of the APA300ML, a small measurement bench is installed on top of a metrology granite with excellent flatness.
|
To measure the flatness of the two mechanical interfaces of the APA300ML, a small measurement bench is installed on top of a metrology granite with excellent flatness.
|
||||||
@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ APA 7 & 18.7\\
|
|||||||
\end{center}
|
\end{center}
|
||||||
\end{minipage}
|
\end{minipage}
|
||||||
\section{Electrical Measurements}
|
\section{Electrical Measurements}
|
||||||
\label{sec:orgbec5e3a}
|
\label{sec:orgd08d506}
|
||||||
\label{ssec:test_apa_electrical_measurements}
|
\label{ssec:test_apa_electrical_measurements}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
From the documentation of the APA300ML, the total capacitance of the three stacks should be between \(18\,\mu F\) and \(26\,\mu F\) with a nominal capacitance of \(20\,\mu F\).
|
From the documentation of the APA300ML, the total capacitance of the three stacks should be between \(18\,\mu F\) and \(26\,\mu F\) with a nominal capacitance of \(20\,\mu F\).
|
||||||
@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ APA 7 & 4.85 & 9.85\\
|
|||||||
\end{center}
|
\end{center}
|
||||||
\end{minipage}
|
\end{minipage}
|
||||||
\section{Stroke and Hysteresis Measurement}
|
\section{Stroke and Hysteresis Measurement}
|
||||||
\label{sec:org7997ce8}
|
\label{sec:org1a772f2}
|
||||||
\label{ssec:test_apa_stroke_measurements}
|
\label{ssec:test_apa_stroke_measurements}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In order to verify that the stroke of the APA300ML is as specified in the datasheet, one side of the APA is fixed to the granite, and a displacement probe\footnote{Millimar 1318 probe, specified linearity better than \(1\,\mu m\)} is located on the other side as shown in Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_stroke_bench}.
|
In order to verify that the stroke of the APA300ML is as specified in the datasheet, one side of the APA is fixed to the granite, and a displacement probe\footnote{Millimar 1318 probe, specified linearity better than \(1\,\mu m\)} is located on the other side as shown in Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_stroke_bench}.
|
||||||
@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ From now on, only the six APA that behave as expected will be used.
|
|||||||
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_stroke}Generated voltage across the two piezoelectric stack actuators to estimate the stroke of the APA300ML (\subref{fig:test_apa_stroke_voltage}). Measured displacement as a function of the applied voltage (\subref{fig:test_apa_stroke_hysteresis})}
|
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_stroke}Generated voltage across the two piezoelectric stack actuators to estimate the stroke of the APA300ML (\subref{fig:test_apa_stroke_voltage}). Measured displacement as a function of the applied voltage (\subref{fig:test_apa_stroke_hysteresis})}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
\section{Flexible Mode Measurement}
|
\section{Flexible Mode Measurement}
|
||||||
\label{sec:orga2217ed}
|
\label{sec:orgf072115}
|
||||||
\label{ssec:test_apa_spurious_resonances}
|
\label{ssec:test_apa_spurious_resonances}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In this section, the flexible modes of the APA300ML are investigated both experimentally and using a Finite Element Model.
|
In this section, the flexible modes of the APA300ML are investigated both experimentally and using a Finite Element Model.
|
||||||
@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ Another explanation is the shape difference between the manufactured APA300ML an
|
|||||||
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_meas_freq_compare}Obtained frequency response functions for the 2 tests with the instrumented hammer and the laser vibrometer. The Y-bending mode is measured at \(280\,\text{Hz}\) and the X-bending mode at \(412\,\text{Hz}\)}
|
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_meas_freq_compare}Obtained frequency response functions for the 2 tests with the instrumented hammer and the laser vibrometer. The Y-bending mode is measured at \(280\,\text{Hz}\) and the X-bending mode at \(412\,\text{Hz}\)}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
\chapter{Dynamical measurements}
|
\chapter{Dynamical measurements}
|
||||||
\label{sec:orgdf7ee61}
|
\label{sec:org2e49535}
|
||||||
\label{sec:test_apa_dynamics}
|
\label{sec:test_apa_dynamics}
|
||||||
After the basic measurements on the APA were performed in Section \ref{sec:test_apa_basic_meas}, a new test bench is used to better characterize the dynamics of the APA300ML.
|
After the basic measurements on the APA were performed in Section \ref{sec:test_apa_basic_meas}, a new test bench is used to better characterize the dynamics of the APA300ML.
|
||||||
This test bench, depicted in Figure \ref{fig:test_bench_apa}, comprises the APA300ML fixed at one end to a stationary granite block, and at the other end to a 5kg granite block that is vertically guided by an air bearing.
|
This test bench, depicted in Figure \ref{fig:test_bench_apa}, comprises the APA300ML fixed at one end to a stationary granite block, and at the other end to a 5kg granite block that is vertically guided by an air bearing.
|
||||||
@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ Finally, the Integral Force Feedback is implemented, and the amount of damping a
|
|||||||
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_schematic}Schematic of the Test Bench used to measured the dynamics of the APA300ML. \(u\) is the output DAC voltage, \(V_a\) the output amplifier voltage (i.e. voltage applied across the actuator stacks), \(d_e\) the measured displacement by the encoder and \(V_s\) the measured voltage across the sensor stack.}
|
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_schematic}Schematic of the Test Bench used to measured the dynamics of the APA300ML. \(u\) is the output DAC voltage, \(V_a\) the output amplifier voltage (i.e. voltage applied across the actuator stacks), \(d_e\) the measured displacement by the encoder and \(V_s\) the measured voltage across the sensor stack.}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
\section{Hysteresis}
|
\section{Hysteresis}
|
||||||
\label{sec:org7aacb8e}
|
\label{sec:org63e3610}
|
||||||
\label{ssec:test_apa_hysteresis}
|
\label{ssec:test_apa_hysteresis}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As the payload is vertically guided without friction, the hysteresis of the APA can be estimated from the motion of the payload.
|
As the payload is vertically guided without friction, the hysteresis of the APA can be estimated from the motion of the payload.
|
||||||
@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ This is the typical behavior expected from a PZT stack actuator where the hyster
|
|||||||
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_meas_hysteresis}Obtained hysteresis curves (displacement as a function of applied voltage) for multiple excitation amplitudes}
|
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_meas_hysteresis}Obtained hysteresis curves (displacement as a function of applied voltage) for multiple excitation amplitudes}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
\section{Axial stiffness}
|
\section{Axial stiffness}
|
||||||
\label{sec:org5cd81d2}
|
\label{sec:org68f94d3}
|
||||||
\label{ssec:test_apa_stiffness}
|
\label{ssec:test_apa_stiffness}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In order to estimate the stiffness of the APA, a weight with known mass \(m_a = 6.4\,\text{kg}\) is added on top of the suspended granite and the deflection \(d_e\) is measured using the encoder.
|
In order to estimate the stiffness of the APA, a weight with known mass \(m_a = 6.4\,\text{kg}\) is added on top of the suspended granite and the deflection \(d_e\) is measured using the encoder.
|
||||||
@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ To estimate this effect for the APA300ML, its stiffness is estimated using the `
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
It is found that the open-circuit stiffness is estimated at \(k_{\text{oc}} \approx 2.3\,N/\mu m\) while the the closed-circuit stiffness \(k_{\text{sc}} \approx 1.7\,N/\mu m\).
|
It is found that the open-circuit stiffness is estimated at \(k_{\text{oc}} \approx 2.3\,N/\mu m\) while the the closed-circuit stiffness \(k_{\text{sc}} \approx 1.7\,N/\mu m\).
|
||||||
\section{Dynamics}
|
\section{Dynamics}
|
||||||
\label{sec:org9be9924}
|
\label{sec:org7856f12}
|
||||||
\label{ssec:test_apa_meas_dynamics}
|
\label{ssec:test_apa_meas_dynamics}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In this section, the dynamics from the excitation voltage \(u\) to the encoder measured displacement \(d_e\) and to the force sensor voltage \(V_s\) is identified.
|
In this section, the dynamics from the excitation voltage \(u\) to the encoder measured displacement \(d_e\) and to the force sensor voltage \(V_s\) is identified.
|
||||||
@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ All the identified dynamics of the six APA300ML (both when looking at the encode
|
|||||||
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_frf_dynamics}Measured frequency response function from generated voltage \(u\) to the encoder displacement \(d_e\) (\subref{fig:test_apa_frf_encoder}) and to the force sensor voltage \(V_s\) (\subref{fig:test_apa_frf_force}) for the six APA300ML}
|
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_frf_dynamics}Measured frequency response function from generated voltage \(u\) to the encoder displacement \(d_e\) (\subref{fig:test_apa_frf_encoder}) and to the force sensor voltage \(V_s\) (\subref{fig:test_apa_frf_force}) for the six APA300ML}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
\section{Non Minimum Phase Zero?}
|
\section{Non Minimum Phase Zero?}
|
||||||
\label{sec:org5d96397}
|
\label{sec:org49578de}
|
||||||
\label{ssec:test_apa_non_minimum_phase}
|
\label{ssec:test_apa_non_minimum_phase}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
It was surprising to observe a non-minimum phase behavior for the zero on the transfer function from \(u\) to \(V_s\) (Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_frf_force}).
|
It was surprising to observe a non-minimum phase behavior for the zero on the transfer function from \(u\) to \(V_s\) (Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_frf_force}).
|
||||||
@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ However, this is not so important here as the zero is lightly damped (i.e. very
|
|||||||
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_non_minimum_phase}Measurement of the anti-resonance found on the transfer function from \(u\) to \(V_s\). The coherence (\subref{fig:test_apa_non_minimum_phase_coherence}) is quite good around the anti-resonance frequency. The phase (\subref{fig:test_apa_non_minimum_phase_zoom}) shoes a non-minimum phase behavior.}
|
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_non_minimum_phase}Measurement of the anti-resonance found on the transfer function from \(u\) to \(V_s\). The coherence (\subref{fig:test_apa_non_minimum_phase_coherence}) is quite good around the anti-resonance frequency. The phase (\subref{fig:test_apa_non_minimum_phase_zoom}) shoes a non-minimum phase behavior.}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
\section{Effect of the resistor on the IFF Plant}
|
\section{Effect of the resistor on the IFF Plant}
|
||||||
\label{sec:orge8ed591}
|
\label{sec:org8b60e04}
|
||||||
\label{ssec:test_apa_resistance_sensor_stack}
|
\label{ssec:test_apa_resistance_sensor_stack}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A resistor \(R \approx 80.6\,k\Omega\) is added in parallel with the sensor stack which has the effect to form a high pass filter with the capacitance of the piezoelectric stack (capacitance estimated at \(\approx 5\,\mu F\)).
|
A resistor \(R \approx 80.6\,k\Omega\) is added in parallel with the sensor stack which has the effect to form a high pass filter with the capacitance of the piezoelectric stack (capacitance estimated at \(\approx 5\,\mu F\)).
|
||||||
@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ It is confirmed that the added resistor as the effect of adding an high pass fil
|
|||||||
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_effect_resistance}Transfer function from \(u\) to \(V_s\) with and without the resistor \(R\) in parallel with the piezoelectric stack used as the force sensor}
|
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_effect_resistance}Transfer function from \(u\) to \(V_s\) with and without the resistor \(R\) in parallel with the piezoelectric stack used as the force sensor}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
\section{Integral Force Feedback}
|
\section{Integral Force Feedback}
|
||||||
\label{sec:orge2d1f26}
|
\label{sec:orga8f1ff3}
|
||||||
\label{ssec:test_apa_iff_locus}
|
\label{ssec:test_apa_iff_locus}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In order to implement the Integral Force Feedback strategy, the measured frequency response function from \(u\) to \(V_s\) (Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_frf_force}) is fitted using the transfer function shown in equation \eqref{eq:test_apa_iff_manual_fit}.
|
In order to implement the Integral Force Feedback strategy, the measured frequency response function from \(u\) to \(V_s\) (Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_frf_force}) is fitted using the transfer function shown in equation \eqref{eq:test_apa_iff_manual_fit}.
|
||||||
@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ The two obtained root loci are compared in Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_iff_root_loc
|
|||||||
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_iff}Experimental results of applying Integral Force Feedback to the APA300ML. Obtained damped plant (\subref{fig:test_apa_identified_damped_plants}) and Root Locus (\subref{fig:test_apa_iff_root_locus})}
|
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_iff}Experimental results of applying Integral Force Feedback to the APA300ML. Obtained damped plant (\subref{fig:test_apa_identified_damped_plants}) and Root Locus (\subref{fig:test_apa_iff_root_locus})}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
\chapter{APA300ML - 2 Degrees of Freedom Model}
|
\chapter{APA300ML - 2 Degrees of Freedom Model}
|
||||||
\label{sec:org42297a7}
|
\label{sec:org4cdbff1}
|
||||||
\label{sec:test_apa_model_2dof}
|
\label{sec:test_apa_model_2dof}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In this section, a simscape model (Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_bench_model}) of the measurement bench is used to compare the model of the APA with the measured frequency response functions.
|
In this section, a simscape model (Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_bench_model}) of the measurement bench is used to compare the model of the APA with the measured frequency response functions.
|
||||||
@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ The obtained model dynamics is compared with the measurements in Section \ref{ss
|
|||||||
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_bench_model}Screenshot of the Simscape model}
|
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_bench_model}Screenshot of the Simscape model}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
\section{Two Degrees of Freedom APA Model}
|
\section{Two Degrees of Freedom APA Model}
|
||||||
\label{sec:org97d98f4}
|
\label{sec:org5d75a3a}
|
||||||
\label{ssec:test_apa_2dof_model}
|
\label{ssec:test_apa_2dof_model}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The model of the amplified piezoelectric actuator is shown in Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_2dof_model}.
|
The model of the amplified piezoelectric actuator is shown in Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_2dof_model}.
|
||||||
@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ Such simple model has some limitations:
|
|||||||
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_2dof_model}Schematic of the two degrees of freedom model of the APA300ML, adapted from \cite{souleille18_concep_activ_mount_space_applic}}
|
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_2dof_model}Schematic of the two degrees of freedom model of the APA300ML, adapted from \cite{souleille18_concep_activ_mount_space_applic}}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
\section{Tuning of the APA model}
|
\section{Tuning of the APA model}
|
||||||
\label{sec:org29ff205}
|
\label{sec:org10fafb5}
|
||||||
\label{ssec:test_apa_2dof_model_tuning}
|
\label{ssec:test_apa_2dof_model_tuning}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
9 parameters (\(m\), \(k_1\), \(c_1\), \(k_e\), \(c_e\), \(k_a\), \(c_a\), \(g_s\) and \(g_a\)) have to be tuned such that the dynamics of the model (Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_2dof_model_simscape}) well represents the identified dynamics in Section \ref{sec:test_apa_dynamics}.
|
9 parameters (\(m\), \(k_1\), \(c_1\), \(k_e\), \(c_e\), \(k_a\), \(c_a\), \(g_s\) and \(g_a\)) have to be tuned such that the dynamics of the model (Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_2dof_model_simscape}) well represents the identified dynamics in Section \ref{sec:test_apa_dynamics}.
|
||||||
@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ The obtained parameters of the model shown in Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_2dof_mode
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
\end{table}
|
\end{table}
|
||||||
\section{Obtained Dynamics}
|
\section{Obtained Dynamics}
|
||||||
\label{sec:orgbff057f}
|
\label{sec:org0831884}
|
||||||
\label{ssec:test_apa_2dof_model_result}
|
\label{ssec:test_apa_2dof_model_result}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The dynamics of the two degrees of freedom model of the APA300ML is now extracted using optimized parameters (listed in Table \ref{tab:test_apa_2dof_parameters}) from the Simscape model.
|
The dynamics of the two degrees of freedom model of the APA300ML is now extracted using optimized parameters (listed in Table \ref{tab:test_apa_2dof_parameters}) from the Simscape model.
|
||||||
@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ This indicates that this model represents well the axial dynamics of the APA300M
|
|||||||
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_2dof_comp_frf}Comparison of the measured frequency response functions and the identified dynamics from the 2DoF model of the APA300ML. Both for the dynamics from \(u\) to \(d_e\) (\subref{fig:test_apa_2dof_comp_frf_enc}) (\subref{fig:test_apa_2dof_comp_frf_force}) and from \(u\) to \(V_s\) (\subref{fig:test_apa_2dof_comp_frf_force})}
|
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_2dof_comp_frf}Comparison of the measured frequency response functions and the identified dynamics from the 2DoF model of the APA300ML. Both for the dynamics from \(u\) to \(d_e\) (\subref{fig:test_apa_2dof_comp_frf_enc}) (\subref{fig:test_apa_2dof_comp_frf_force}) and from \(u\) to \(V_s\) (\subref{fig:test_apa_2dof_comp_frf_force})}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
\chapter{APA300ML - Super Element}
|
\chapter{APA300ML - Super Element}
|
||||||
\label{sec:org703026b}
|
\label{sec:org8292e07}
|
||||||
\label{sec:test_apa_model_flexible}
|
\label{sec:test_apa_model_flexible}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In this section, a \emph{super element} of the APA300ML is computed using a finite element software\footnote{Ansys\textsuperscript{\textregistered} was used}.
|
In this section, a \emph{super element} of the APA300ML is computed using a finite element software\footnote{Ansys\textsuperscript{\textregistered} was used}.
|
||||||
@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ It will be used to measure the strain experience by this stack, and model the se
|
|||||||
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_super_element_simscape}Finite Element Model of the APA300ML with ``remotes points'' on the left. Simscape model with included ``Reduced Order Flexible Solid'' on the right.}
|
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_super_element_simscape}Finite Element Model of the APA300ML with ``remotes points'' on the left. Simscape model with included ``Reduced Order Flexible Solid'' on the right.}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
\section{Identification of the Actuator and Sensor constants}
|
\section{Identification of the Actuator and Sensor constants}
|
||||||
\label{sec:org1fc96a6}
|
\label{sec:org28294e9}
|
||||||
\label{ssec:test_apa_flexible_ga_gs}
|
\label{ssec:test_apa_flexible_ga_gs}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Once the APA300ML \emph{super element} is included in the Simscape model, the transfer function from \(F_a\) to \(d_L\) and \(d_e\) can be extracted.
|
Once the APA300ML \emph{super element} is included in the Simscape model, the transfer function from \(F_a\) to \(d_L\) and \(d_e\) can be extracted.
|
||||||
@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ From these parameters, \(g_s = 5.1\,V/\mu m\) and \(g_a = 26\,N/V\) were obtaine
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
\end{table}
|
\end{table}
|
||||||
\section{Comparison of the obtained dynamics}
|
\section{Comparison of the obtained dynamics}
|
||||||
\label{sec:orgd657b0f}
|
\label{sec:org14d2335}
|
||||||
\label{ssec:test_apa_flexible_comp_frf}
|
\label{ssec:test_apa_flexible_comp_frf}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The obtained dynamics using the \emph{super element} with the tuned ``sensor gain'' and ``actuator gain'' are compared with the experimentally identified frequency response functions in Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_super_element_comp_frf}.
|
The obtained dynamics using the \emph{super element} with the tuned ``sensor gain'' and ``actuator gain'' are compared with the experimentally identified frequency response functions in Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_super_element_comp_frf}.
|
||||||
@ -719,20 +719,27 @@ Using this simple test bench, it can be concluded that the \emph{super element}
|
|||||||
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_super_element_comp_frf}Comparison of the measured frequency response functions and the identified dynamics from the ``flexible'' model of the APA300ML. Both for the dynamics from \(u\) to \(d_e\) (\subref{fig:test_apa_2dof_comp_frf_enc}) (\subref{fig:test_apa_2dof_comp_frf_force}) and from \(u\) to \(V_s\) (\subref{fig:test_apa_2dof_comp_frf_force})}
|
\caption{\label{fig:test_apa_super_element_comp_frf}Comparison of the measured frequency response functions and the identified dynamics from the ``flexible'' model of the APA300ML. Both for the dynamics from \(u\) to \(d_e\) (\subref{fig:test_apa_2dof_comp_frf_enc}) (\subref{fig:test_apa_2dof_comp_frf_force}) and from \(u\) to \(V_s\) (\subref{fig:test_apa_2dof_comp_frf_force})}
|
||||||
\end{figure}
|
\end{figure}
|
||||||
\chapter{Conclusion}
|
\chapter{Conclusion}
|
||||||
\label{sec:org0ba1df7}
|
\label{sec:org10e068b}
|
||||||
\label{sec:test_apa_conclusion}
|
\label{sec:test_apa_conclusion}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The main characteristics of the APA300ML such as hysteresis and axial stiffness have been measured and were found to comply with the specifications.
|
In this study, the received amplified piezoelectric actuators ``APA300ML'' have been characterized to make sure they are fulfilling all the requirements determined during the detailed design phase.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The dynamics of the received APA were measured and found to all be identical (Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_frf_dynamics}).
|
Geometrical features such as the flatness of its interfaces, electrical capacitance and achievable strokes were measured in Section \ref{sec:test_apa_basic_meas}.
|
||||||
Even tough a non-minimum zero was observed on the transfer function from \(u\) to \(V_s\) (Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_non_minimum_phase}), it was not found to be problematic as large amount of damping could be added using the integral force feedback strategy (Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_iff}).
|
These simple measurements allowed for early detection of a manufacturing defect in one of the APA300ML.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Then in Section \ref{sec:test_apa_dynamics}, using a dedicated test bench, the dynamics of all the APA300ML were measured and were found to all match very well (Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_frf_dynamics}).
|
||||||
|
This consistency indicates good manufacturing tolerances, facilitating the modeling and control of the nano-hexapod.
|
||||||
|
Although a non-minimum zero was identified in the transfer function from \(u\) to \(V_s\) (Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_non_minimum_phase}), it was found not to be problematic as large amount of damping could be added using the integral force feedback strategy (Figure \ref{fig:test_apa_iff}).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Then, two different models were used to represent the APA300ML dynamics.
|
||||||
|
In Section \ref{sec:test_apa_model_2dof}, a simple two degrees of freedom mass-spring-damper model was presented and tuned based on the measured dynamics.
|
||||||
|
After following a tuning procedure (see Section \ref{ssec:test_apa_2dof_model_tuning}), the model dynamics was shown to match very well with the experiment.
|
||||||
|
However, it is important to note that this model only represents the axial dynamics of the actuators, assuming infinite stiffness in other directions.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{itemize}
|
In Section \ref{sec:test_apa_model_flexible}, a \emph{super element} extracted from a finite element model was used to model the APA300ML.
|
||||||
\item Compare 2DoF and FEM models (usefulness of the two)
|
This time, the \emph{super element} represents the dynamics of the APA300ML in all directions.
|
||||||
\item Good match between all the APA: will simplify the modeling and control of the nano-hexapod
|
However, only the axial dynamics could be compared with the experimental results yielding a good match.
|
||||||
\item No advantage of the FEM model here (as only uniaxial behavior is checked), but may be useful later
|
The benefit of employing this model over the two degrees of freedom model is not immediately apparent due to its increased complexity and the larger number of model states involved.
|
||||||
\end{itemize}
|
Nonetheless, the \emph{super element} model's value will become clear in subsequent sections, when its capacity to accurately model the APA300ML's flexibility across various directions will be important.
|
||||||
\printbibliography[heading=bibintoc,title={Bibliography}]
|
\printbibliography[heading=bibintoc,title={Bibliography}]
|
||||||
\end{document}
|
\end{document}
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user