Minor modifications after integration in the Thesis
This commit is contained in:
parent
35f695b0f6
commit
021a2744cb
@ -92,8 +92,7 @@
|
|||||||
(setq org-latex-subtitle-format "\\subtitle{%s}")
|
(setq org-latex-subtitle-format "\\subtitle{%s}")
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
(setq org-export-before-parsing-hook '(org-ref-glossary-before-parsing
|
(setq org-export-before-parsing-hook '(org-ref-glossary-before-parsing
|
||||||
org-ref-acronyms-before-parsing
|
org-ref-acronyms-before-parsing))
|
||||||
tdh-org-ref-extract-bibtex-to-file))
|
|
||||||
#+END_SRC
|
#+END_SRC
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* Introduction :ignore:
|
* Introduction :ignore:
|
||||||
@ -117,9 +116,9 @@ Once the system is well damped, a feedback position controller is applied, and t
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
Two key effects that may limit that positioning performances are then considered: the limited micro-station compliance (Section ref:sec:uniaxial_support_compliance) and the presence of dynamics between the nano-hexapod and the sample's point of interest (Section ref:sec:uniaxial_payload_dynamics).
|
Two key effects that may limit that positioning performances are then considered: the limited micro-station compliance (Section ref:sec:uniaxial_support_compliance) and the presence of dynamics between the nano-hexapod and the sample's point of interest (Section ref:sec:uniaxial_payload_dynamics).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Conclusion remarks are given in Section ref:sec:conclusion.
|
Conclusion remarks are given in Section ref:sec:uniaxial_conclusion.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#+name: tab:section_matlab_code
|
#+name: tab:uniaxial_section_matlab_code
|
||||||
#+caption: Report sections and corresponding Matlab files
|
#+caption: Report sections and corresponding Matlab files
|
||||||
#+attr_latex: :environment tabularx :width 0.6\linewidth :align lX
|
#+attr_latex: :environment tabularx :width 0.6\linewidth :align lX
|
||||||
#+attr_latex: :center t :booktabs t
|
#+attr_latex: :center t :booktabs t
|
||||||
@ -5594,21 +5593,19 @@ It will be therefore important to take special care when designing sampling envi
|
|||||||
#+end_important
|
#+end_important
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* Conclusion
|
* Conclusion
|
||||||
<<sec:conclusion>>
|
<<sec:uniaxial_conclusion>>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In this study, a uniaxial model of the nano-active-stabilization-system has been tuned both from dynamical measurements (Section ref:sec:micro_station_model) and from disturbances measurements (Section ref:sec:uniaxial_disturbances).
|
In this study, a uniaxial model of the nano-active-stabilization-system has been tuned both from dynamical measurements (Section ref:sec:micro_station_model) and from disturbances measurements (Section ref:sec:uniaxial_disturbances).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
It has been shown that three active damping techniques can be used to critically damp the nano-hexapod resonances (Section ref:sec:uniaxial_active_damping).
|
It has been shown that three active damping techniques can be used to critically damp the nano-hexapod resonances (Section ref:sec:uniaxial_active_damping).
|
||||||
However, this model does not allows to determine which one is most suited to this application.
|
However, this model does not allows to determine which one is most suited to this application.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Finally, position feedback controllers have been developed for three considered nano-hexapod stiffnesses.
|
Position feedback controllers have been developed for three considered nano-hexapod stiffnesses (Section ref:sec:uniaxial_position_control).
|
||||||
These controllers were shown to be robust to the change of sample's masses, and to provide good rejection of disturbances.
|
These controllers were shown to be robust to the change of sample's masses, and to provide good rejection of disturbances.
|
||||||
It has been found that having a soft nano-hexapod makes the plant dynamics easier to control (because decoupled from the micro-station dynamics) and requires less position feedback bandwidth to fulfill the requirements.
|
It has been found that having a soft nano-hexapod makes the plant dynamics easier to control (because decoupled from the micro-station dynamics, see Section ref:sec:uniaxial_support_compliance) and requires less position feedback bandwidth to fulfill the requirements.
|
||||||
The moderately stiff nano-hexapod ($k_n = 1\,N/\mu m$) is requiring a bit more position feedback bandwidth, but it still seems to give acceptable results.
|
The moderately stiff nano-hexapod ($k_n = 1\,N/\mu m$) is requiring a bit more position feedback bandwidth, but it still seems to give acceptable results.
|
||||||
However, the stiff nano-hexapod is the most complex to control and gives the worst positioning performance.
|
However, the stiff nano-hexapod is the most complex to control and gives the worst positioning performance.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# TODO - Add summary table of advantages and disadvantages of nano-hexapod stiffnesses
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* Bibliography :ignore:
|
* Bibliography :ignore:
|
||||||
#+latex: \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc,title={Bibliography}]
|
#+latex: \printbibliography[heading=bibintoc,title={Bibliography}]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Binary file not shown.
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||||||
% Created 2023-06-30 Fri 20:00
|
% Created 2023-07-03 Mon 17:24
|
||||||
% Intended LaTeX compiler: pdflatex
|
% Intended LaTeX compiler: pdflatex
|
||||||
\documentclass[a4paper, 10pt, DIV=12, parskip=full, bibliography=totoc]{scrreprt}
|
\documentclass[a4paper, 10pt, DIV=12, parskip=full, bibliography=totoc]{scrreprt}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -943,12 +943,11 @@ In this study, a uniaxial model of the nano-active-stabilization-system has been
|
|||||||
It has been shown that three active damping techniques can be used to critically damp the nano-hexapod resonances (Section \ref{sec:uniaxial_active_damping}).
|
It has been shown that three active damping techniques can be used to critically damp the nano-hexapod resonances (Section \ref{sec:uniaxial_active_damping}).
|
||||||
However, this model does not allows to determine which one is most suited to this application.
|
However, this model does not allows to determine which one is most suited to this application.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Finally, position feedback controllers have been developed for three considered nano-hexapod stiffnesses.
|
Position feedback controllers have been developed for three considered nano-hexapod stiffnesses (Section \ref{sec:uniaxial_position_control}).
|
||||||
These controllers were shown to be robust to the change of sample's masses, and to provide good rejection of disturbances.
|
These controllers were shown to be robust to the change of sample's masses, and to provide good rejection of disturbances.
|
||||||
It has been found that having a soft nano-hexapod makes the plant dynamics easier to control (because decoupled from the micro-station dynamics) and requires less position feedback bandwidth to fulfill the requirements.
|
It has been found that having a soft nano-hexapod makes the plant dynamics easier to control (because decoupled from the micro-station dynamics, see Section \ref{sec:uniaxial_support_compliance}) and requires less position feedback bandwidth to fulfill the requirements.
|
||||||
The moderately stiff nano-hexapod (\(k_n = 1\,N/\mu m\)) is requiring a bit more position feedback bandwidth, but it still seems to give acceptable results.
|
The moderately stiff nano-hexapod (\(k_n = 1\,N/\mu m\)) is requiring a bit more position feedback bandwidth, but it still seems to give acceptable results.
|
||||||
However, the stiff nano-hexapod is the most complex to control and gives the worst positioning performance.
|
However, the stiff nano-hexapod is the most complex to control and gives the worst positioning performance.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\printbibliography[heading=bibintoc,title={Bibliography}]
|
\printbibliography[heading=bibintoc,title={Bibliography}]
|
||||||
\end{document}
|
\end{document}
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user