tdehaeze/nass-simscape
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Use online CSS and JS

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Dehaeze
2021-02-20 23:09:27 +01:00
parent bd054638b2
commit 36181282b6
37 changed files with 8722 additions and 8640 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

320
docs/uncertainty_payload.html
View File

@@ -1,66 +1,70 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en">
<head>
<!-- 2020-05-05 mar. 10:33 -->
<!-- 2021-02-20 sam. 23:08 -->
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8" />
<title>Effect of Uncertainty on the payload&rsquo;s dynamics on the isolation platform dynamics</title>
<meta name="generator" content="Org mode" />
<meta name="author" content="Dehaeze Thomas" />
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="./css/htmlize.css"/>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="./css/readtheorg.css"/>
<script src="./js/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script src="./js/bootstrap.min.js"></script>
<script src="./js/jquery.stickytableheaders.min.js"></script>
<script src="./js/readtheorg.js"></script>
<script>MathJax = {
tex: {
tags: 'ams',
macros: {bm: ["\\boldsymbol{#1}",1],}
}
};
</script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/mathjax@3/es5/tex-mml-chtml.js"></script>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://research.tdehaeze.xyz/css/style.css"/>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://research.tdehaeze.xyz/js/script.js"></script>
<script>
MathJax = {
svg: {
scale: 1,
fontCache: "global"
},
tex: {
tags: "ams",
multlineWidth: "%MULTLINEWIDTH",
tagSide: "right",
macros: {bm: ["\\boldsymbol{#1}",1],},
tagIndent: ".8em"
}
};
</script>
<script id="MathJax-script" async
src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/mathjax@3/es5/tex-svg.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
<div id="org-div-home-and-up">
<a accesskey="h" href="./index.html"> UP </a>
|
<a accesskey="H" href="./index.html"> HOME </a>
<a accesskey="H" href="../../index.html"> HOME </a>
</div><div id="content">
<h1 class="title">Effect of Uncertainty on the payload&rsquo;s dynamics on the isolation platform dynamics</h1>
<div id="table-of-contents">
<h2>Table of Contents</h2>
<div id="text-table-of-contents">
<ul>
<li><a href="#orgcc5f0ec">1. Simple Introductory Example</a>
<li><a href="#org4c816e0">1. Simple Introductory Example</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="#org5ed1517">1.1. Equations of motion</a></li>
<li><a href="#org4efccbf">1.2. Initialization of the payload dynamics</a></li>
<li><a href="#orgb400ca3">1.3. Initialization of the isolation platform</a></li>
<li><a href="#orgd0dd88b">1.4. Comparison</a></li>
<li><a href="#org3f697cc">1.5. Conclusion</a></li>
<li><a href="#orgaf607f3">1.1. Equations of motion</a></li>
<li><a href="#org08d6c58">1.2. Initialization of the payload dynamics</a></li>
<li><a href="#orgd871eaf">1.3. Initialization of the isolation platform</a></li>
<li><a href="#org28efeb7">1.4. Comparison</a></li>
<li><a href="#org95c8f67">1.5. Conclusion</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a href="#org1f8e63e">2. Generalization to arbitrary dynamics</a>
<li><a href="#org7c75d19">2. Generalization to arbitrary dynamics</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="#orgc4fa63e">2.1. Introduction</a></li>
<li><a href="#org3367211">2.2. Equations of motion</a></li>
<li><a href="#orge217a33">2.3. Impedance \(G^\prime(s)\) of a mass-spring-damper payload</a></li>
<li><a href="#org0ee44da">2.4. First Analytical analysis</a></li>
<li><a href="#orgfe81c1c">2.5. Impedance of the Payload and Dynamical Uncertainty</a></li>
<li><a href="#org5e0366d">2.6. Equivalent Inverse Multiplicative Uncertainty</a></li>
<li><a href="#orgcc0c290">2.7. Effect of the Isolation platform Stiffness</a></li>
<li><a href="#org1466bd9">2.8. Reduce the Uncertainty on the plant</a>
<li><a href="#org5080024">2.1. Introduction</a></li>
<li><a href="#org1b0c4a4">2.2. Equations of motion</a></li>
<li><a href="#org0505562">2.3. Impedance \(G^\prime(s)\) of a mass-spring-damper payload</a></li>
<li><a href="#orge0f3a40">2.4. First Analytical analysis</a></li>
<li><a href="#orgc1a00ca">2.5. Impedance of the Payload and Dynamical Uncertainty</a></li>
<li><a href="#org456b213">2.6. Equivalent Inverse Multiplicative Uncertainty</a></li>
<li><a href="#org1d2455c">2.7. Effect of the Isolation platform Stiffness</a></li>
<li><a href="#org1321ab2">2.8. Reduce the Uncertainty on the plant</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="#org4be463f">2.8.1. Effect of the platform&rsquo;s stiffness \(k\)</a></li>
<li><a href="#org4c45fb5">2.8.2. Effect of the platform&rsquo;s damping \(c\)</a></li>
<li><a href="#org9086831">2.8.3. Effect of the platform&rsquo;s mass \(m\)</a></li>
<li><a href="#org7519de0">2.8.1. Effect of the platform&rsquo;s stiffness \(k\)</a></li>
<li><a href="#org2cfe073">2.8.2. Effect of the platform&rsquo;s damping \(c\)</a></li>
<li><a href="#org20f04de">2.8.3. Effect of the platform&rsquo;s mass \(m\)</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a href="#org272e76a">2.9. Conclusion</a></li>
<li><a href="#orgff05731">2.9. Conclusion</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
@@ -84,18 +88,18 @@ The goal is to study:
Two models are made to study these effects:
</p>
<ul class="org-ul">
<li>In section <a href="#org971d11c">1</a>, simple mass-spring-damper systems are chosen to model both the isolation platform and the payload</li>
<li>In section <a href="#org7065358">2</a>, we consider arbitrary payload dynamics with multiplicative input uncertainty to study the unmodelled dynamics of the payload</li>
<li>In section <a href="#org752f885">1</a>, simple mass-spring-damper systems are chosen to model both the isolation platform and the payload</li>
<li>In section <a href="#org1cfcec8">2</a>, we consider arbitrary payload dynamics with multiplicative input uncertainty to study the unmodelled dynamics of the payload</li>
</ul>
<div id="outline-container-orgcc5f0ec" class="outline-2">
<h2 id="orgcc5f0ec"><span class="section-number-2">1</span> Simple Introductory Example</h2>
<div id="outline-container-org4c816e0" class="outline-2">
<h2 id="org4c816e0"><span class="section-number-2">1</span> Simple Introductory Example</h2>
<div class="outline-text-2" id="text-1">
<p>
<a id="org971d11c"></a>
<a id="org752f885"></a>
</p>
<p>
Let&rsquo;s consider the system shown in Figure <a href="#orgaa77a57">1</a> consisting of:
Let&rsquo;s consider the system shown in Figure <a href="#orge9db1fc">1</a> consisting of:
</p>
<ul class="org-ul">
<li>An <b>isolation platform</b> represented by a mass \(m\), a stiffness \(k\) and a dashpot \(c\) and an actuator \(F\)</li>
@@ -107,18 +111,18 @@ The goal is to stabilize \(x\) using \(F\) in spite of uncertainty on the payloa
</p>
<div id="orgaa77a57" class="figure">
<div id="orge9db1fc" class="figure">
<p><img src="figs/2dof_system_stiffness_uncertainty_payload.png" alt="2dof_system_stiffness_uncertainty_payload.png" />
</p>
<p><span class="figure-number">Figure 1: </span>Two degrees-of-freedom system</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="outline-container-org5ed1517" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="org5ed1517"><span class="section-number-3">1.1</span> Equations of motion</h3>
<div id="outline-container-orgaf607f3" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="orgaf607f3"><span class="section-number-3">1.1</span> Equations of motion</h3>
<div class="outline-text-3" id="text-1-1">
<p>
If we write the equation of motion of the system in Figure <a href="#orgaa77a57">1</a>, we obtain:
If we write the equation of motion of the system in Figure <a href="#orge9db1fc">1</a>, we obtain:
</p>
\begin{align}
ms^2 x &= F - (cs + k) x + (c^\prime s + k^\prime) (x^\prime - x) \\
@@ -129,14 +133,14 @@ If we write the equation of motion of the system in Figure <a href="#orgaa77a57"
After eliminating \(x^\prime\), we obtain:
</p>
\begin{equation}
\label{orge5d69a3}
\label{orgfd11867}
\frac{x}{F} = \frac{m^\prime s^2 + c^\prime s + k^\prime}{(ms^2 + cs + k)(m^\prime s^2 + c^\prime s + k^\prime) + m^\prime s^2(c^\prime s + k^\prime)}
\end{equation}
</div>
</div>
<div id="outline-container-org4efccbf" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="org4efccbf"><span class="section-number-3">1.2</span> Initialization of the payload dynamics</h3>
<div id="outline-container-org08d6c58" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="org08d6c58"><span class="section-number-3">1.2</span> Initialization of the payload dynamics</h3>
<div class="outline-text-3" id="text-1-2">
<p>
Let the payload have:
@@ -148,12 +152,12 @@ Let the payload have:
</ul>
<div class="org-src-container">
<pre class="src src-matlab">mpi = 50;
kpi = 5e6;
cpi = 3e3;
<pre class="src src-matlab"> mpi = 50;
kpi = 5e6;
cpi = 3e3;
kpi = (2*pi*50)^2*mpi;
cpi = 0.2*sqrt(kpi*mpi);
kpi = (2<span class="org-type">*</span><span class="org-constant">pi</span><span class="org-type">*</span>50)<span class="org-type">^</span>2<span class="org-type">*</span>mpi;
cpi = 0.2<span class="org-type">*</span>sqrt(kpi<span class="org-type">*</span>mpi);
</pre>
</div>
@@ -161,14 +165,14 @@ cpi = 0.2*sqrt(kpi*mpi);
Let&rsquo;s also consider some uncertainty in those parameters:
</p>
<div class="org-src-container">
<pre class="src src-matlab">mp = ureal('m', mpi, 'Range', [1, 100]);
cp = ureal('c', cpi, 'Percentage', 30);
kp = ureal('k', kpi, 'Percentage', 30);
<pre class="src src-matlab"> mp = ureal(<span class="org-string">'m'</span>, mpi, <span class="org-string">'Range'</span>, [1, 100]);
cp = ureal(<span class="org-string">'c'</span>, cpi, <span class="org-string">'Percentage'</span>, 30);
kp = ureal(<span class="org-string">'k'</span>, kpi, <span class="org-string">'Percentage'</span>, 30);
</pre>
</div>
<p>
The compliance of the payload without the isolation platform is \(\frac{1}{m^\prime s^2 + c^\prime s + k^\prime}\) and its bode plot is shown in Figure <a href="#org3c89797">2</a>.
The compliance of the payload without the isolation platform is \(\frac{1}{m^\prime s^2 + c^\prime s + k^\prime}\) and its bode plot is shown in Figure <a href="#orgfaa9b30">2</a>.
</p>
<p>
@@ -176,7 +180,7 @@ One can see that the payload has a resonance frequency of \(\omega_0^\prime = 25
</p>
<div id="org3c89797" class="figure">
<div id="orgfaa9b30" class="figure">
<p><img src="figs/nominal_payload_compliance_dynamics.png" alt="nominal_payload_compliance_dynamics.png" />
</p>
<p><span class="figure-number">Figure 2: </span>Nominal compliance of the payload (<a href="./figs/nominal_payload_compliance_dynamics.png">png</a>, <a href="./figs/nominal_payload_compliance_dynamics.pdf">pdf</a>)</p>
@@ -184,14 +188,14 @@ One can see that the payload has a resonance frequency of \(\omega_0^\prime = 25
</div>
</div>
<div id="outline-container-orgb400ca3" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="orgb400ca3"><span class="section-number-3">1.3</span> Initialization of the isolation platform</h3>
<div id="outline-container-orgd871eaf" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="orgd871eaf"><span class="section-number-3">1.3</span> Initialization of the isolation platform</h3>
<div class="outline-text-3" id="text-1-3">
<p>
Let&rsquo;s first fix the mass of the isolation platform:
</p>
<div class="org-src-container">
<pre class="src src-matlab">m = 10;
<pre class="src src-matlab"> m = 10;
</pre>
</div>
@@ -206,15 +210,15 @@ And we generate three isolation platforms:
</div>
</div>
<div id="outline-container-orgd0dd88b" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="orgd0dd88b"><span class="section-number-3">1.4</span> Comparison</h3>
<div id="outline-container-org28efeb7" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="org28efeb7"><span class="section-number-3">1.4</span> Comparison</h3>
<div class="outline-text-3" id="text-1-4">
<p>
The obtained dynamics from \(F\) to \(x\) for the three isolation platform are shown in Figure <a href="#org1a62889">3</a>.
The obtained dynamics from \(F\) to \(x\) for the three isolation platform are shown in Figure <a href="#org57a4827">3</a>.
</p>
<div id="org1a62889" class="figure">
<div id="org57a4827" class="figure">
<p><img src="figs/plant_dynamics_uncertainty_payload_variability.png" alt="plant_dynamics_uncertainty_payload_variability.png" />
</p>
<p><span class="figure-number">Figure 3: </span>Obtained plant for the three isolation platforms considered (<a href="./figs/plant_dynamics_uncertainty_payload_variability.png">png</a>, <a href="./figs/plant_dynamics_uncertainty_payload_variability.pdf">pdf</a>)</p>
@@ -222,10 +226,10 @@ The obtained dynamics from \(F\) to \(x\) for the three isolation platform are s
</div>
</div>
<div id="outline-container-org3f697cc" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="org3f697cc"><span class="section-number-3">1.5</span> Conclusion</h3>
<div id="outline-container-org95c8f67" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="org95c8f67"><span class="section-number-3">1.5</span> Conclusion</h3>
<div class="outline-text-3" id="text-1-5">
<div class="important">
<div class="important" id="orgae2c60b">
<p>
The stiff platform dynamics does not seems to depend on the dynamics of the payload.
</p>
@@ -235,21 +239,21 @@ The stiff platform dynamics does not seems to depend on the dynamics of the payl
</div>
</div>
<div id="outline-container-org1f8e63e" class="outline-2">
<h2 id="org1f8e63e"><span class="section-number-2">2</span> Generalization to arbitrary dynamics</h2>
<div id="outline-container-org7c75d19" class="outline-2">
<h2 id="org7c75d19"><span class="section-number-2">2</span> Generalization to arbitrary dynamics</h2>
<div class="outline-text-2" id="text-2">
<p>
<a id="org7065358"></a>
<a id="org1cfcec8"></a>
</p>
</div>
<div id="outline-container-orgc4fa63e" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="orgc4fa63e"><span class="section-number-3">2.1</span> Introduction</h3>
<div id="outline-container-org5080024" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="org5080024"><span class="section-number-3">2.1</span> Introduction</h3>
<div class="outline-text-3" id="text-2-1">
<p>
Let&rsquo;s now consider a general payload described by its <b>impedance</b> \(G^\prime(s) = \frac{F^\prime}{x}\) as shown in Figure <a href="#orgb54b79a">4</a>.
Let&rsquo;s now consider a general payload described by its <b>impedance</b> \(G^\prime(s) = \frac{F^\prime}{x}\) as shown in Figure <a href="#org8c5577f">4</a>.
</p>
<div class="note">
<div class="note" id="org70c39e9">
<p>
Note here that we use the term <i>impedance</i>, however, the mechanical impedance is usually defined as the ratio of the force over the velocity \(F^\prime/\dot{x}\). We should refer to <i>resistance</i> instead of <i>impedance</i>.
</p>
@@ -257,17 +261,17 @@ Note here that we use the term <i>impedance</i>, however, the mechanical impedan
</div>
<div id="orgb54b79a" class="figure">
<div id="org8c5577f" class="figure">
<p><img src="figs/general_payload_impedance.png" alt="general_payload_impedance.png" />
</p>
<p><span class="figure-number">Figure 4: </span>General support</p>
</div>
<p>
Now let&rsquo;s consider the system consisting of a mass-spring-system (the isolation platform) supporting the general payload as shown in Figure <a href="#orga07f362">5</a>.
Now let&rsquo;s consider the system consisting of a mass-spring-system (the isolation platform) supporting the general payload as shown in Figure <a href="#orgdc750e6">5</a>.
</p>
<div id="orga07f362" class="figure">
<div id="orgdc750e6" class="figure">
<p><img src="figs/general_payload_with_isolator.png" alt="general_payload_with_isolator.png" />
</p>
<p><span class="figure-number">Figure 5: </span>Mass-Spring-Damper (isolation platform) supporting a general payload</p>
@@ -275,8 +279,8 @@ Now let&rsquo;s consider the system consisting of a mass-spring-system (the isol
</div>
</div>
<div id="outline-container-org3367211" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="org3367211"><span class="section-number-3">2.2</span> Equations of motion</h3>
<div id="outline-container-org1b0c4a4" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="org1b0c4a4"><span class="section-number-3">2.2</span> Equations of motion</h3>
<div class="outline-text-3" id="text-2-2">
<p>
We have to following equations of motion:
@@ -290,9 +294,9 @@ We have to following equations of motion:
And by eliminating \(F^\prime\), we find the plant dynamics \(G(s) = \frac{x}{F}\).
</p>
<div class="important">
<div class="important" id="org7e9adf1">
\begin{equation}
\label{org8b9a6a7}
\label{org11f0d43}
\frac{x}{F} = \frac{1}{ms^2 + cs + k + G^\prime(s)}
\end{equation}
@@ -308,11 +312,11 @@ We can learn few things about the obtained transfer function:
</div>
</div>
<div id="outline-container-orge217a33" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="orge217a33"><span class="section-number-3">2.3</span> Impedance \(G^\prime(s)\) of a mass-spring-damper payload</h3>
<div id="outline-container-org0505562" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="org0505562"><span class="section-number-3">2.3</span> Impedance \(G^\prime(s)\) of a mass-spring-damper payload</h3>
<div class="outline-text-3" id="text-2-3">
<p>
In order to verify that the formula is correct, let&rsquo;s take the same mass-spring-damper system used in the system shown in Figure <a href="#orgaa77a57">1</a>:
In order to verify that the formula is correct, let&rsquo;s take the same mass-spring-damper system used in the system shown in Figure <a href="#orge9db1fc">1</a>:
</p>
\begin{align*}
m^\prime s^2 x^\prime &= (x - x^\prime) (c^\prime s + k^\prime) \\
@@ -322,7 +326,7 @@ In order to verify that the formula is correct, let&rsquo;s take the same mass-s
<p>
By eliminating \(x^\prime\) of the equations, we obtain:
</p>
<div class="important">
<div class="important" id="orgb96f8e8">
\begin{equation}
G^\prime(s) = \frac{F^\prime}{x} = \frac{m^\prime s^2 (c^\prime s + k)}{m^\prime s^2 + c^\prime s + k^\prime} \label{eq:impedance_mass_spring_damper}
\end{equation}
@@ -343,11 +347,11 @@ And we obtain
\end{align*}
<p>
Which is the same transfer function that was obtained in section <a href="#org971d11c">1</a> (Eq. \eqref{eq:plant_simple_system}).
Which is the same transfer function that was obtained in section <a href="#org752f885">1</a> (Eq. \eqref{eq:plant_simple_system}).
</p>
<p>
The impedance of the mass-spring-damper system is shown in Figure <a href="#org61b9db6">6</a>.
The impedance of the mass-spring-damper system is shown in Figure <a href="#orgb67a7fe">6</a>.
</p>
<ul class="org-ul">
<li>Before the resonance frequency \(\omega_0^\prime\), the impedance follows the mass line</li>
@@ -356,7 +360,7 @@ The impedance of the mass-spring-damper system is shown in Figure <a href="#org6
</ul>
<div id="org61b9db6" class="figure">
<div id="orgb67a7fe" class="figure">
<p><img src="figs/example_impedance_mass_spring_damper.png" alt="example_impedance_mass_spring_damper.png" />
</p>
<p><span class="figure-number">Figure 6: </span>Example of the impedance of a mass-spring-damper system (<a href="./figs/example_impedance_mass_spring_damper.png">png</a>, <a href="./figs/example_impedance_mass_spring_damper.pdf">pdf</a>)</p>
@@ -364,8 +368,8 @@ The impedance of the mass-spring-damper system is shown in Figure <a href="#org6
</div>
</div>
<div id="outline-container-org0ee44da" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="org0ee44da"><span class="section-number-3">2.4</span> First Analytical analysis</h3>
<div id="outline-container-orge0f3a40" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="orge0f3a40"><span class="section-number-3">2.4</span> First Analytical analysis</h3>
<div class="outline-text-3" id="text-2-4">
<p>
To summarize, we consider:
@@ -421,7 +425,7 @@ Until \(\omega_0^\prime\), we have \(m^\prime \ll m\) which is the same conditio
Above \(\omega_0^\prime\), we obtain \(|jc^\prime \omega + k| \ll m \omega^2\).
</p>
<div class="important">
<div class="important" id="orgc2589fd">
<p>
When using a soft isolation platform and a stiff payload such that the payload resonate above the first resonance of the isolation platform, the mass of the payload should be small compared to the isolation platform mass in order to not disturb the dynamics of the isolation platform.
</p>
@@ -430,8 +434,8 @@ When using a soft isolation platform and a stiff payload such that the payload r
</div>
</div>
<div id="outline-container-orgfe81c1c" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="orgfe81c1c"><span class="section-number-3">2.5</span> Impedance of the Payload and Dynamical Uncertainty</h3>
<div id="outline-container-orgc1a00ca" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="orgc1a00ca"><span class="section-number-3">2.5</span> Impedance of the Payload and Dynamical Uncertainty</h3>
<div class="outline-text-3" id="text-2-5">
<p>
We model the payload by a mass-spring-damper model with some uncertainty.
@@ -451,16 +455,16 @@ The main resonance of the payload is then \(\omega^\prime = \sqrt{\frac{m^\prime
</p>
<div class="org-src-container">
<pre class="src src-matlab">m0 = 10;
c0 = 3e2;
k0 = 5e5;
<pre class="src src-matlab"> m0 = 10;
c0 = 3e2;
k0 = 5e5;
Gp0 = (m0*s^2 * (c0*s + k0))/(m0*s^2 + c0*s + k0);
Gp0 = (m0<span class="org-type">*</span>s<span class="org-type">^</span>2 <span class="org-type">*</span> (c0<span class="org-type">*</span>s <span class="org-type">+</span> k0))<span class="org-type">/</span>(m0<span class="org-type">*</span>s<span class="org-type">^</span>2 <span class="org-type">+</span> c0<span class="org-type">*</span>s <span class="org-type">+</span> k0);
</pre>
</div>
<p>
Let&rsquo;s represent the uncertainty on the impedance of the payload by a multiplicative uncertainty (Figure <a href="#org880bb53">7</a>):
Let&rsquo;s represent the uncertainty on the impedance of the payload by a multiplicative uncertainty (Figure <a href="#org6a86e10">7</a>):
\[ G^\prime(s) = G_0^\prime(s)(1 + w_I^\prime(s)\Delta_I(s)) \quad |\Delta_I(j\omega)| < 1\ \forall \omega \]
</p>
@@ -469,7 +473,7 @@ This could represent <b>unmodelled dynamics</b> or unknown parameters of the pay
</p>
<div id="org880bb53" class="figure">
<div id="org6a86e10" class="figure">
<p><img src="figs/input_uncertainty_set.png" alt="input_uncertainty_set.png" />
</p>
<p><span class="figure-number">Figure 7: </span>Input Multiplicative Uncertainty</p>
@@ -485,11 +489,11 @@ where \(r_0\) is the relative uncertainty at steady-state, \(1/\tau\) is the fre
The parameters are defined below.
</p>
<div class="org-src-container">
<pre class="src src-matlab">r0 = 0.5;
tau = 1/(50*2*pi);
rinf = 10;
<pre class="src src-matlab"> r0 = 0.5;
tau = 1<span class="org-type">/</span>(50<span class="org-type">*</span>2<span class="org-type">*</span><span class="org-constant">pi</span>);
rinf = 10;
wI = (tau*s + r0)/((tau/rinf)*s + 1);
wI = (tau<span class="org-type">*</span>s <span class="org-type">+</span> r0)<span class="org-type">/</span>((tau<span class="org-type">/</span>rinf)<span class="org-type">*</span>s <span class="org-type">+</span> 1);
</pre>
</div>
@@ -497,7 +501,7 @@ wI = (tau*s + r0)/((tau/rinf)*s + 1);
We then generate a complex \(\Delta\).
</p>
<div class="org-src-container">
<pre class="src src-matlab">DeltaI = ucomplex('A',0);
<pre class="src src-matlab"> DeltaI = ucomplex(<span class="org-string">'A'</span>,0);
</pre>
</div>
@@ -505,16 +509,16 @@ We then generate a complex \(\Delta\).
We generate the uncertain plant \(G^\prime(s)\).
</p>
<div class="org-src-container">
<pre class="src src-matlab">Gp = Gp0*(1+wI*DeltaI);
<pre class="src src-matlab"> Gp = Gp0<span class="org-type">*</span>(1<span class="org-type">+</span>wI<span class="org-type">*</span>DeltaI);
</pre>
</div>
<p>
A set of uncertainty payload&rsquo;s impedance transfer functions is shown in Figure <a href="#orgc40ac91">8</a>.
A set of uncertainty payload&rsquo;s impedance transfer functions is shown in Figure <a href="#org62be1c1">8</a>.
</p>
<div id="orgc40ac91" class="figure">
<div id="org62be1c1" class="figure">
<p><img src="figs/payload_impedance_uncertainty.png" alt="payload_impedance_uncertainty.png" />
</p>
<p><span class="figure-number">Figure 8: </span>Uncertainty of the payload&rsquo;s impedance (<a href="./figs/payload_impedance_uncertainty.png">png</a>, <a href="./figs/payload_impedance_uncertainty.pdf">pdf</a>)</p>
@@ -522,8 +526,8 @@ A set of uncertainty payload&rsquo;s impedance transfer functions is shown in Fi
</div>
</div>
<div id="outline-container-org5e0366d" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="org5e0366d"><span class="section-number-3">2.6</span> Equivalent Inverse Multiplicative Uncertainty</h3>
<div id="outline-container-org456b213" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="org456b213"><span class="section-number-3">2.6</span> Equivalent Inverse Multiplicative Uncertainty</h3>
<div class="outline-text-3" id="text-2-6">
<p>
Let&rsquo;s express the uncertainty of the plant \(x/F\) as a function of the parameters as well as of the uncertainty on the platform&rsquo;s compliance:
@@ -533,9 +537,9 @@ Let&rsquo;s express the uncertainty of the plant \(x/F\) as a function of the pa
&= \frac{1}{ms^2 + cs + k + G_0^\prime(s)} \cdot \frac{1}{1 + \frac{G_0^\prime(s) w_I(s)}{ms^2 + cs + k + G_0^\prime(s)} \Delta(s)}\\
\end{align*}
<div class="important">
<div class="important" id="org8137f47">
<p>
We can the plant dynamics that as an inverse multiplicative uncertainty (Figure <a href="#org90e7eef">9</a>):
We can the plant dynamics that as an inverse multiplicative uncertainty (Figure <a href="#org4d0f12d">9</a>):
</p>
\begin{equation}
\frac{x}{F} = G_0(s) (1 + w_{iI}(s) \Delta(s))^{-1}
@@ -551,7 +555,7 @@ with:
</div>
<div id="org90e7eef" class="figure">
<div id="org4d0f12d" class="figure">
<p><img src="figs/inverse_uncertainty_set.png" alt="inverse_uncertainty_set.png" />
</p>
<p><span class="figure-number">Figure 9: </span>Inverse Multiplicative Uncertainty</p>
@@ -559,14 +563,14 @@ with:
</div>
</div>
<div id="outline-container-orgcc0c290" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="orgcc0c290"><span class="section-number-3">2.7</span> Effect of the Isolation platform Stiffness</h3>
<div id="outline-container-org1d2455c" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="org1d2455c"><span class="section-number-3">2.7</span> Effect of the Isolation platform Stiffness</h3>
<div class="outline-text-3" id="text-2-7">
<p>
Let&rsquo;s first fix the mass of the isolation platform:
</p>
<div class="org-src-container">
<pre class="src src-matlab">m = 20;
<pre class="src src-matlab"> m = 20;
</pre>
</div>
@@ -583,12 +587,12 @@ And we generate three isolation platforms:
Soft Isolation Platform:
</p>
<div class="org-src-container">
<pre class="src src-matlab">k_soft = m*(2*pi*5)^2;
c_soft = 0.1*sqrt(m*k_soft);
<pre class="src src-matlab"> k_soft = m<span class="org-type">*</span>(2<span class="org-type">*</span><span class="org-constant">pi</span><span class="org-type">*</span>5)<span class="org-type">^</span>2;
c_soft = 0.1<span class="org-type">*</span>sqrt(m<span class="org-type">*</span>k_soft);
G_soft = 1/(m*s^2 + c_soft*s + k_soft + Gp);
G0_soft = 1/(m*s^2 + c_soft*s + k_soft + Gp0);
wiI_soft = Gp0*G0_soft*wI;
G_soft = 1<span class="org-type">/</span>(m<span class="org-type">*</span>s<span class="org-type">^</span>2 <span class="org-type">+</span> c_soft<span class="org-type">*</span>s <span class="org-type">+</span> k_soft <span class="org-type">+</span> Gp);
G0_soft = 1<span class="org-type">/</span>(m<span class="org-type">*</span>s<span class="org-type">^</span>2 <span class="org-type">+</span> c_soft<span class="org-type">*</span>s <span class="org-type">+</span> k_soft <span class="org-type">+</span> Gp0);
wiI_soft = Gp0<span class="org-type">*</span>G0_soft<span class="org-type">*</span>wI;
</pre>
</div>
@@ -596,12 +600,12 @@ wiI_soft = Gp0*G0_soft*wI;
Mid Isolation Platform
</p>
<div class="org-src-container">
<pre class="src src-matlab">k_mid = m*(2*pi*50)^2;
c_mid = 0.1*sqrt(m*k_mid);
<pre class="src src-matlab"> k_mid = m<span class="org-type">*</span>(2<span class="org-type">*</span><span class="org-constant">pi</span><span class="org-type">*</span>50)<span class="org-type">^</span>2;
c_mid = 0.1<span class="org-type">*</span>sqrt(m<span class="org-type">*</span>k_mid);
G_mid = 1/(m*s^2 + c_mid*s + k_mid + Gp);
G0_mid = 1/(m*s^2 + c_mid*s + k_mid + Gp0);
wiI_mid = Gp0*G0_mid*wI;
G_mid = 1<span class="org-type">/</span>(m<span class="org-type">*</span>s<span class="org-type">^</span>2 <span class="org-type">+</span> c_mid<span class="org-type">*</span>s <span class="org-type">+</span> k_mid <span class="org-type">+</span> Gp);
G0_mid = 1<span class="org-type">/</span>(m<span class="org-type">*</span>s<span class="org-type">^</span>2 <span class="org-type">+</span> c_mid<span class="org-type">*</span>s <span class="org-type">+</span> k_mid <span class="org-type">+</span> Gp0);
wiI_mid = Gp0<span class="org-type">*</span>G0_mid<span class="org-type">*</span>wI;
</pre>
</div>
@@ -609,21 +613,21 @@ wiI_mid = Gp0*G0_mid*wI;
Stiff Isolation Platform
</p>
<div class="org-src-container">
<pre class="src src-matlab">k_stiff = m*(2*pi*500)^2;
c_stiff = 0.1*sqrt(m*k_stiff);
<pre class="src src-matlab"> k_stiff = m<span class="org-type">*</span>(2<span class="org-type">*</span><span class="org-constant">pi</span><span class="org-type">*</span>500)<span class="org-type">^</span>2;
c_stiff = 0.1<span class="org-type">*</span>sqrt(m<span class="org-type">*</span>k_stiff);
G_stiff = 1/(m*s^2 + c_stiff*s + k_stiff + Gp);
G0_stiff = 1/(m*s^2 + c_stiff*s + k_stiff + Gp0);
wiI_stiff = Gp0*G0_stiff*wI;
G_stiff = 1<span class="org-type">/</span>(m<span class="org-type">*</span>s<span class="org-type">^</span>2 <span class="org-type">+</span> c_stiff<span class="org-type">*</span>s <span class="org-type">+</span> k_stiff <span class="org-type">+</span> Gp);
G0_stiff = 1<span class="org-type">/</span>(m<span class="org-type">*</span>s<span class="org-type">^</span>2 <span class="org-type">+</span> c_stiff<span class="org-type">*</span>s <span class="org-type">+</span> k_stiff <span class="org-type">+</span> Gp0);
wiI_stiff = Gp0<span class="org-type">*</span>G0_stiff<span class="org-type">*</span>wI;
</pre>
</div>
<p>
The obtained transfer functions \(x/F\) for each of the three platforms are shown in Figure <a href="#org864ba65">10</a>.
The obtained transfer functions \(x/F\) for each of the three platforms are shown in Figure <a href="#orgf9a8ac5">10</a>.
</p>
<div id="org864ba65" class="figure">
<div id="orgf9a8ac5" class="figure">
<p><img src="figs/plant_uncertainty_impedance_payload.png" alt="plant_uncertainty_impedance_payload.png" />
</p>
<p><span class="figure-number">Figure 10: </span>Obtained plant for the three isolators (<a href="./figs/plant_uncertainty_impedance_payload.png">png</a>, <a href="./figs/plant_uncertainty_impedance_payload.pdf">pdf</a>)</p>
@@ -631,8 +635,8 @@ The obtained transfer functions \(x/F\) for each of the three platforms are show
</div>
</div>
<div id="outline-container-org1466bd9" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="org1466bd9"><span class="section-number-3">2.8</span> Reduce the Uncertainty on the plant</h3>
<div id="outline-container-org1321ab2" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="org1321ab2"><span class="section-number-3">2.8</span> Reduce the Uncertainty on the plant</h3>
<div class="outline-text-3" id="text-2-8">
<p>
Now that we know the expression of the uncertainty on the plant, we can wonder what parameters of the isolation platform would lower the plant uncertainty, or at least bring the uncertainty to reasonable level.
@@ -648,30 +652,30 @@ Let&rsquo;s study separately the effect of the platform&rsquo;s mass, damping an
</p>
</div>
<div id="outline-container-org4be463f" class="outline-4">
<h4 id="org4be463f"><span class="section-number-4">2.8.1</span> Effect of the platform&rsquo;s stiffness \(k\)</h4>
<div id="outline-container-org7519de0" class="outline-4">
<h4 id="org7519de0"><span class="section-number-4">2.8.1</span> Effect of the platform&rsquo;s stiffness \(k\)</h4>
<div class="outline-text-4" id="text-2-8-1">
<p>
Let&rsquo;s fix \(\xi = \frac{c}{2\sqrt{km}} = 0.1\), \(m = 100\ [kg]\) and see the evolution of \(|w_{iI}(j\omega)|\) with \(k\).
</p>
<p>
This is first shown for few values of the stiffness \(k\) in figure <a href="#org5456162">11</a>
This is first shown for few values of the stiffness \(k\) in figure <a href="#orgd59ef39">11</a>
</p>
<div id="org5456162" class="figure">
<div id="orgd59ef39" class="figure">
<p><img src="figs/inverse_multiplicative_uncertainty_payload_few_k.png" alt="inverse_multiplicative_uncertainty_payload_few_k.png" />
</p>
<p><span class="figure-number">Figure 11: </span>Norm of the inverse multiplicative uncertainty weight for various values of the the isolation platform&rsquo;s stiffness (<a href="./figs/inverse_multiplicative_uncertainty_payload_few_k.png">png</a>, <a href="./figs/inverse_multiplicative_uncertainty_payload_few_k.pdf">pdf</a>)</p>
</div>
<p>
The norm of the uncertainty weight \(|w_iI(j\omega)|\) is displayed as a function of \(\omega\) and \(k\) in Figure <a href="#org362ed76">12</a>.
The norm of the uncertainty weight \(|w_iI(j\omega)|\) is displayed as a function of \(\omega\) and \(k\) in Figure <a href="#org20cbb63">12</a>.
</p>
<div id="org362ed76" class="figure">
<div id="org20cbb63" class="figure">
<p><img src="figs/inverse_multiplicative_payload_uncertainty_norm_k.png" alt="inverse_multiplicative_payload_uncertainty_norm_k.png" />
</p>
<p><span class="figure-number">Figure 12: </span>Evolution of the norm of the uncertainty weight \(|w_{iI}(j\omega)|\) as a function of the platform&rsquo;s stiffness \(k\) (<a href="./figs/inverse_multiplicative_payload_uncertainty_norm_k.png">png</a>, <a href="./figs/inverse_multiplicative_payload_uncertainty_norm_k.pdf">pdf</a>)</p>
@@ -686,12 +690,12 @@ Instead of plotting as a function of the platform&rsquo;s stiffness, we can plot
</ul>
<p>
The obtain plot is shown in Figure <a href="#org27fe0c1">13</a>.
The obtain plot is shown in Figure <a href="#orgab7b13f">13</a>.
In that case, we can see that with a platform&rsquo;s resonance frequency 10 times higher than the resonance of the payload, we get less than \(1\%\) uncertainty until some fairly high frequency.
</p>
<div id="org27fe0c1" class="figure">
<div id="orgab7b13f" class="figure">
<p><img src="figs/inverse_multiplicative_payload_uncertainty_k_normalized_frequency.png" alt="inverse_multiplicative_payload_uncertainty_k_normalized_frequency.png" />
</p>
<p><span class="figure-number">Figure 13: </span>Evolution of the norm of the uncertainty weight \(|w_{iI}(j\omega)|\) as a function of the frequency ratio \(\omega_0/\omega_0^\prime\) (<a href="./figs/inverse_multiplicative_payload_uncertainty_k_normalized_frequency.png">png</a>, <a href="./figs/inverse_multiplicative_payload_uncertainty_k_normalized_frequency.pdf">pdf</a>)</p>
@@ -699,15 +703,15 @@ In that case, we can see that with a platform&rsquo;s resonance frequency 10 tim
</div>
</div>
<div id="outline-container-org4c45fb5" class="outline-4">
<h4 id="org4c45fb5"><span class="section-number-4">2.8.2</span> Effect of the platform&rsquo;s damping \(c\)</h4>
<div id="outline-container-org2cfe073" class="outline-4">
<h4 id="org2cfe073"><span class="section-number-4">2.8.2</span> Effect of the platform&rsquo;s damping \(c\)</h4>
<div class="outline-text-4" id="text-2-8-2">
<p>
Let&rsquo;s fix \(k = 10^7\ [N/m]\), \(m = 100\ [kg]\) and see the evolution of \(|w_{iI}(j\omega)|\) with the isolation platform damping \(c\) (Figure <a href="#org51df34a">14</a>).
Let&rsquo;s fix \(k = 10^7\ [N/m]\), \(m = 100\ [kg]\) and see the evolution of \(|w_{iI}(j\omega)|\) with the isolation platform damping \(c\) (Figure <a href="#org96c279d">14</a>).
</p>
<div id="org51df34a" class="figure">
<div id="org96c279d" class="figure">
<p><img src="figs/inverse_multiplicative_payload_uncertainty_c.png" alt="inverse_multiplicative_payload_uncertainty_c.png" />
</p>
<p><span class="figure-number">Figure 14: </span>Evolution of the norm of the uncertainty weight \(|w_{iI}(j\omega)|\) as a function of the platform&rsquo;s damping ratio \(\xi\) (<a href="./figs/inverse_multiplicative_payload_uncertainty_c.png">png</a>, <a href="./figs/inverse_multiplicative_payload_uncertainty_c.pdf">pdf</a>)</p>
@@ -715,15 +719,15 @@ Let&rsquo;s fix \(k = 10^7\ [N/m]\), \(m = 100\ [kg]\) and see the evolution of
</div>
</div>
<div id="outline-container-org9086831" class="outline-4">
<h4 id="org9086831"><span class="section-number-4">2.8.3</span> Effect of the platform&rsquo;s mass \(m\)</h4>
<div id="outline-container-org20f04de" class="outline-4">
<h4 id="org20f04de"><span class="section-number-4">2.8.3</span> Effect of the platform&rsquo;s mass \(m\)</h4>
<div class="outline-text-4" id="text-2-8-3">
<p>
Let&rsquo;s fix \(k = 10^7\ [N/m]\), \(\xi = \frac{c}{2\sqrt{km}} = 0.1\) and see the evolution of \(|w_{iI}(j\omega)|\) with the payload mass \(m\) (Figure <a href="#orgd260e86">15</a>).
Let&rsquo;s fix \(k = 10^7\ [N/m]\), \(\xi = \frac{c}{2\sqrt{km}} = 0.1\) and see the evolution of \(|w_{iI}(j\omega)|\) with the payload mass \(m\) (Figure <a href="#org24afcde">15</a>).
</p>
<div id="orgd260e86" class="figure">
<div id="org24afcde" class="figure">
<p><img src="figs/inverse_multiplicative_payload_uncertainty_m.png" alt="inverse_multiplicative_payload_uncertainty_m.png" />
</p>
<p><span class="figure-number">Figure 15: </span>Evolution of the norm of the uncertainty weight \(|w_{iI}(j\omega)|\) as a function of the payload mass \(m\) (<a href="./figs/inverse_multiplicative_payload_uncertainty_m.png">png</a>, <a href="./figs/inverse_multiplicative_payload_uncertainty_m.pdf">pdf</a>)</p>
@@ -732,12 +736,12 @@ Let&rsquo;s fix \(k = 10^7\ [N/m]\), \(\xi = \frac{c}{2\sqrt{km}} = 0.1\) and se
</div>
</div>
<div id="outline-container-org272e76a" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="org272e76a"><span class="section-number-3">2.9</span> Conclusion</h3>
<div id="outline-container-orgff05731" class="outline-3">
<h3 id="orgff05731"><span class="section-number-3">2.9</span> Conclusion</h3>
<div class="outline-text-3" id="text-2-9">
<div class="important">
<div class="important" id="orgc7b7116">
<p>
As was expected from Eq. \eqref{org8b9a6a7}, it is usually a good idea to maximize the mass, damping and stiffness of the isolation platform in order to be less sensible to the payload dynamics.
As was expected from Eq. \eqref{org11f0d43}, it is usually a good idea to maximize the mass, damping and stiffness of the isolation platform in order to be less sensible to the payload dynamics.
</p>
<p>
@@ -745,7 +749,7 @@ The best thing to do is to have a stiff isolation platform.
</p>
<p>
If a soft isolation platform is to be used, it is first a good idea to damp the isolation platform as shown in Figure <a href="#org51df34a">14</a>.
If a soft isolation platform is to be used, it is first a good idea to damp the isolation platform as shown in Figure <a href="#org96c279d">14</a>.
This can make the uncertainty quite low until the first resonance of the payload.
In that case, maximizing the stiffness of the payload is a good idea.
</p>
@@ -757,7 +761,7 @@ In that case, maximizing the stiffness of the payload is a good idea.
</div>
<div id="postamble" class="status">
<p class="author">Author: Dehaeze Thomas</p>
<p class="date">Created: 2020-05-05 mar. 10:33</p>
<p class="date">Created: 2021-02-20 sam. 23:08</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>