Re-read section about the dynamical measurements
This commit is contained in:
parent
422ac20733
commit
e243e7c9ad
40
index.org
40
index.org
@ -386,15 +386,16 @@ To estimate the PSD of the position error $\epsilon$ and thus the RMS residual m
|
|||||||
<<sec:micro_station_dynamics>>
|
<<sec:micro_station_dynamics>>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
** Introduction :ignore:
|
** Introduction :ignore:
|
||||||
As explained before, it is very important to have a good estimation of the micro-station dynamics as it will be coupled with the dynamics of the nano-hexapod and thus is very important for both the design of the nano-hexapod and controller.
|
As explained before, it is very important to have a good estimation of the micro-station dynamics as it will be used:
|
||||||
|
- to tune the developed multi-body model of the micro-station with which the simulations will be performed
|
||||||
|
- for the design of the nano-hexapod as it will be coupled with the micro-station
|
||||||
|
- for the design of the controller
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The estimated dynamics will also be used to tune the developed multi-body model of the micro-station with which the simulations will be performed.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
All the measurements performed on the micro-station are detailed in [[https://tdehaeze.github.io/meas-analysis/][this]] document and summarized in the following sections.
|
All the measurements performed on the micro-station are detailed in [[https://tdehaeze.github.io/meas-analysis/][this]] document and summarized in the following sections.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The general procedure to identify the dynamics of the micro-station is shown in Figure [[fig:vibration_analysis_procedure]].
|
The general procedure to identify the dynamics of the micro-station is shown in Figure [[fig:vibration_analysis_procedure]].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The steps are:
|
The steps are:
|
||||||
1. extract a Response Model (Frequency Response Functions) from measurements
|
1. extract a Response Model (Frequency Response Functions) from measurements
|
||||||
2. convert the Response Model into a Modal Model (Natural Frequencies and Mode Shapes)
|
2. convert the Response Model into a Modal Model (Natural Frequencies and Mode Shapes)
|
||||||
@ -405,24 +406,25 @@ The steps are:
|
|||||||
[[file:figs/vibration_analysis_procedure.png]]
|
[[file:figs/vibration_analysis_procedure.png]]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The extraction of the Spatial Model (3rd step) was not performed as it requires a lot of time and was not judge necessary.
|
The extraction of the Spatial Model (3rd step) was not performed as it requires a lot of time and was not judge necessary.
|
||||||
|
Instead, the model will be tuned using both the modal model and the response model.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
** Setup
|
** Experimental Setup
|
||||||
<<sec:id_setup>>
|
<<sec:id_setup>>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To measure the dynamics of such complicated system, it as been chosen to perform a modal analysis.
|
To measure the dynamics of such complicated system, it as been chosen to perform a modal analysis.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To limit the number of degrees of freedom to be measured, we suppose that in the frequency range of interest (DC-300Hz), each of the positioning stage is behaving as a *solid body*.
|
To limit the number of degrees of freedom to be measured, we suppose that in the frequency range of interest (DC-300Hz), each of the positioning stage is behaving as a *solid body*.
|
||||||
Thus, to fully describe the dynamics of the station, we (only) need to measure 6 degrees of freedom on each of the positioning stage (that is 36 degrees of freedom for the 6 solid bodies).
|
Thus, to fully describe the dynamics of the station, we (only) need to measure 6 degrees of freedom for each positioning stage (that is 36 degrees of freedom for the 6 considered solid bodies).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In order to perform the *Modal Analysis*, the following devices were used:
|
In order to perform the modal analysis, the following devices were used:
|
||||||
- An *acquisition system* (OROS) with 24bits ADCs
|
- An acquisition system (OROS) with 24bits ADCs
|
||||||
- 3 tri-axis *Accelerometers*
|
- 3 tri-axis Accelerometers
|
||||||
- An *Instrumented Hammer*
|
- An Instrumented Hammer
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The measurement thus consists of:
|
The measurement consists of:
|
||||||
- Exciting the structure at the same location with the Hammer (Figure [[fig:hammer_z]])
|
- Exciting the structure at the same location with the instrumented hammer (Figure [[fig:hammer_z]])
|
||||||
- Move the accelerometers to measure all the DOF of the structure.
|
- Fix the accelerometers on each of the stages to measure all the DOF of the structure.
|
||||||
The position of the accelerometers are:
|
The position of the accelerometers are:
|
||||||
- 4 on the first granite
|
- 4 on the first granite
|
||||||
- 4 on the second granite
|
- 4 on the second granite
|
||||||
@ -433,7 +435,7 @@ The measurement thus consists of:
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
In total, 69 degrees of freedom are measured (23 tri axis accelerometers) which is more that what was required.
|
In total, 69 degrees of freedom are measured (23 tri axis accelerometers) which is more that what was required.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We chose to have some redundancy in the measurement to be able to verify that the solid-body assumption is correct for each of the stage.
|
It was chosen to have some redundancy in the measurement to be able to verify the correctness of the solid-body assumption.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#+name: fig:hammer_z
|
#+name: fig:hammer_z
|
||||||
#+caption: Example of one hammer impact
|
#+caption: Example of one hammer impact
|
||||||
@ -446,9 +448,10 @@ We chose to have some redundancy in the measurement to be able to verify that th
|
|||||||
** Results
|
** Results
|
||||||
<<sec:id_results>>
|
<<sec:id_results>>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
From the measurements, we obtain all the transfer functions from forces applied at the location of the hammer impacts to the x-y-z acceleration of each solid body at the location of each accelerometer.
|
From the measurements are extracted all the transfer functions from forces applied at the location of the hammer impacts to the x-y-z acceleration of each solid body at the location of each accelerometer.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Modal shapes and natural frequencies are then computed. Example of mode shapes are shown in Figures [[fig:mode1]] [[fig:mode6]].
|
Modal shapes and natural frequencies are then computed.
|
||||||
|
Example of the obtained micro-station's mode shapes are shown in Figures [[fig:mode1]] and [[fig:mode6]].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#+name: fig:mode1
|
#+name: fig:mode1
|
||||||
#+caption: First mode that shows a suspension mode, probably due to bad leveling of one Airloc
|
#+caption: First mode that shows a suspension mode, probably due to bad leveling of one Airloc
|
||||||
@ -465,9 +468,9 @@ From the reduced transfer function matrix, we can re-synthesize the response at
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
#+begin_important
|
#+begin_important
|
||||||
This confirms the fact that the stages are indeed behaving as a solid body in the frequency band of interest.
|
This confirms the fact that the stages are indeed behaving as a solid body in the frequency band of interest.
|
||||||
This thus means that a multi-body model can be used to represent the dynamics of the micro-station.
|
|
||||||
#+end_important
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This thus means that *a multi-body model can be used to correctly represent the dynamics of the micro-station*.
|
||||||
|
#+end_important
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Many Frequency Response Functions (FRF) are obtained from the measurements.
|
Many Frequency Response Functions (FRF) are obtained from the measurements.
|
||||||
Examples of FRF are shown in Figure [[fig:frf_all_bodies_one_direction]].
|
Examples of FRF are shown in Figure [[fig:frf_all_bodies_one_direction]].
|
||||||
@ -479,7 +482,8 @@ These FRF will be used to compare the dynamics of the multi-body model with the
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
** Conclusion
|
** Conclusion
|
||||||
#+begin_important
|
#+begin_important
|
||||||
The modal analysis of the micro-station confirmed the fact that a multi-body model should be able to correctly represents the micro-station dynamics.
|
The dynamical measurements made on the micro-station confirmed the fact that a multi-body model is a good option to correctly represents the micro-station dynamics.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In Section [[sec:multi_body_model]], the obtained Frequency Response Functions will be used to compare the model dynamics with the micro-station dynamics.
|
In Section [[sec:multi_body_model]], the obtained Frequency Response Functions will be used to compare the model dynamics with the micro-station dynamics.
|
||||||
#+end_important
|
#+end_important
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user