Update CSS => bot margin tables
This commit is contained in:
parent
2e584e4e76
commit
3c75adf6c4
@ -9,5 +9,6 @@
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
table {
|
||||
margin: auto;
|
||||
margin-left: auto;
|
||||
margin-right: auto;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
1099
index.html
1099
index.html
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
27
index.org
27
index.org
@ -2031,28 +2031,34 @@ The simulation is considered to be fairly realistic as the model used has been s
|
||||
Table summarizing the nano-hexapod wanted characteristics:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
- Dimensions (Figure [[fig:nano_hexapod_size]])
|
||||
- Dimensions (Figure [[fig:nano_hexapod_size]]):
|
||||
- Maximum Height: 90mm
|
||||
- Diameter of the bottom platform: 300mm
|
||||
- Diameter of the top platform: 200mm
|
||||
- Stiffness:
|
||||
- Resonances should be between 5Hz and 50Hz
|
||||
-
|
||||
- Resonances should stay between 5Hz and 50Hz for payload masses up to 50kg
|
||||
- This corresponds to strut stiffnesses of $k \approx 10^5 - 10^6\,[N/m]$
|
||||
- Flexible joints:
|
||||
- To be optimized such that the above resonances are in the required range
|
||||
-
|
||||
- Axial Stiffness: $K_a > 10^7\,[N/m]$
|
||||
- Bending Stiffness: $K_b < 50\,[Nm/rad]$
|
||||
- Torsion Stiffness: $K_t < 50\,[Nm/rad]$
|
||||
- Required angular stroke: can be estimated with simulations
|
||||
- Force
|
||||
- Force:
|
||||
- Weight: $60\,kg \rightarrow 600\,N \rightarrow 60\,N$ on each actuator
|
||||
- Dynamic: few Newtons
|
||||
- Estimation of the required stroke:
|
||||
- From simulation (i.e. for disturbance rejection alone), $\pm 5 \mu m$ is good
|
||||
- From simulation (i.e. for disturbance rejection alone), $\pm 5 \mu m$
|
||||
- However, the required stroke probably depends on two other factors:
|
||||
- Static positioning errors of the stages
|
||||
- Maximum tracking errors of the stages (mainly translation stage and tilt stage).
|
||||
This is probably more difficult to obtain.
|
||||
However, by limiting the acceleration of these stages, we may limit the dynamic tracking errors to acceptable levels
|
||||
- Sensors to be included
|
||||
- If the chosen technology allows $\pm 50 \mu m$ that would be safer
|
||||
- Sensors to be included:
|
||||
-
|
||||
|
||||
#+name: fig:nano_hexapod_size
|
||||
#+caption: First implementation of the nano-hexapod / deflector and coolsed sample plate support
|
||||
#+caption: First implementation of the nano-hexapod / metrology reflector and sample interface
|
||||
[[file:figs/nano_hexapod_size.png]]
|
||||
|
||||
** Sensor Noise introduced by the Metrology
|
||||
@ -2074,6 +2080,9 @@ This means that above the suspension mode of the granite (here around 2Hz), the
|
||||
|
||||
Sensible to detector motion?
|
||||
|
||||
** Micro Station Architecture
|
||||
https://tdehaeze.github.io/nass-simscape/alternative-micro-station-architecture.html
|
||||
|
||||
** Others Factors that may limit the performances
|
||||
Cable forces?
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user