Deleted old measurement on the spindle

This commit is contained in:
2019-05-15 16:46:54 +02:00
parent 1117428eaa
commit 8f0cd2d3c0
12 changed files with 86 additions and 662 deletions

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 75 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 158 KiB

View File

@@ -116,13 +116,15 @@ A movie showing the experiment is shown on figure [[fig:exp_sl_sp_gif]].
We convert the measured voltage to velocity using the function =voltageToVelocityL22= (accessible [[file:~/MEGA/These/meas/src/index.org][here]]).
#+begin_src matlab
of(:, 1) = voltageToVelocityL22(of(:, 1), of(:, 3), 60);
sr(:, 1) = voltageToVelocityL22(sr(:, 1), sr(:, 3), 60);
sp(:, 1) = voltageToVelocityL22(sp(:, 1), sp(:, 3), 60);
gain = 60; % [dB]
of(:, 2) = voltageToVelocityL22(of(:, 2), of(:, 3), 60);
sr(:, 2) = voltageToVelocityL22(sr(:, 2), sr(:, 3), 60);
sp(:, 2) = voltageToVelocityL22(sp(:, 2), sp(:, 3), 60);
of(:, 1) = voltageToVelocityL22(of(:, 1), of(:, 3), gain);
sr(:, 1) = voltageToVelocityL22(sr(:, 1), sr(:, 3), gain);
sp(:, 1) = voltageToVelocityL22(sp(:, 1), sp(:, 3), gain);
of(:, 2) = voltageToVelocityL22(of(:, 2), of(:, 3), gain);
sr(:, 2) = voltageToVelocityL22(sr(:, 2), sr(:, 3), gain);
sp(:, 2) = voltageToVelocityL22(sp(:, 2), sp(:, 3), gain);
#+end_src
** Time domain plots
@@ -172,6 +174,21 @@ We convert the measured voltage to velocity using the function =voltageToVelocit
#+RESULTS: fig:slip_ring_spindle_sample_time
[[file:figs/slip_ring_spindle_sample_time.png]]
#+begin_src matlab :exports none :tangle no
xlim([0, 1]);
#+end_src
#+NAME: fig:slip_ring_spindle_sample_zoom
#+HEADER: :tangle no :exports results :results value raw replace :noweb yes
#+begin_src matlab :var filepath="figs/slip_ring_spindle_sample_zoom.pdf" :var figsize="wide-normal" :post pdf2svg(file=*this*, ext="png")
<<plt-matlab>>
#+end_src
#+NAME: fig:slip_ring_spindle_sample_zoom
#+CAPTION: Velocity as measured by the geophone at the sample location - Time domain
#+RESULTS: fig:slip_ring_spindle_sample_zoom
[[file:figs/slip_ring_spindle_sample_zoom.png]]
** Frequency Domain
We first compute some parameters that will be used for the PSD computation.
#+begin_src matlab :results none
@@ -193,11 +210,18 @@ First for the geophone located on the marble
And for the geophone located at the sample position.
#+begin_src matlab
[pxof_s, f] = pwelch(of(:, 2), win, [], [], Fs);
[pxof_s, ~] = pwelch(of(:, 2), win, [], [], Fs);
[pxsr_s, ~] = pwelch(sr(:, 2), win, [], [], Fs);
[pxsp_s, ~] = pwelch(sp(:, 2), win, [], [], Fs);
#+end_src
And finally for the relative velocity between the sample and the marble.
#+begin_src matlab
[pxof_r, ~] = pwelch(of(:, 2)-of(:, 1), win, [], [], Fs);
[pxsr_r, ~] = pwelch(sr(:, 2)-sr(:, 1), win, [], [], Fs);
[pxsp_r, ~] = pwelch(sp(:, 2)-sp(:, 1), win, [], [], Fs);
#+end_src
And we plot the ASD of the measured velocities:
- figure [[fig:sr_sp_psd_marble_compare]] for the geophone located on the marble
- figure [[fig:sr_sp_psd_sample_compare]] for the geophone at the sample position
@@ -252,11 +276,37 @@ And we plot the ASD of the measured velocities:
#+RESULTS: fig:sr_sp_psd_sample_compare
[[file:figs/sr_sp_psd_sample_compare.png]]
#+begin_src matlab :results none
figure;
hold on;
plot(f, sqrt(pxsp_r), 'DisplayName', 'Spindle - 6rpm');
plot(f, sqrt(pxsr_r), 'DisplayName', 'Slip-Ring - 6rpm');
plot(f, sqrt(pxof_r), 'DisplayName', 'OFF');
hold off;
set(gca, 'xscale', 'log');
set(gca, 'yscale', 'log');
xlabel('Frequency [Hz]'); ylabel('ASD of the relative velocity $\left[\frac{m/s}{\sqrt{Hz}}\right]$')
legend('Location', 'southwest');
xlim([2, 500]);
#+end_src
#+NAME: fig:sr_sp_psd_relative_compare
#+HEADER: :tangle no :exports results :results value raw replace :noweb yes
#+begin_src matlab :var filepath="figs/sr_sp_psd_relative_compare.pdf" :var figsize="full-tall" :post pdf2svg(file=*this*, ext="png")
<<plt-matlab>>
#+end_src
#+NAME: fig:sr_sp_psd_relative_compare
#+CAPTION: Comparison of the ASD of the relative velocity
#+RESULTS: fig:sr_sp_psd_relative_compare
[[file:figs/sr_sp_psd_relative_compare.png]]
** Conclusion
#+begin_important
- The slip-ring rotation induces almost no vibrations on the marble, and only a little vibrations on the sample above 100Hz.
- The spindle rotation induces a lot of vibrations of the sample as well as on the granite.
- There is a huge peak at 24Hz on the sample vibration but not on the granite vibration. The peak is really sharp, could this be due to magnetic effect?
- Should redo the measurement with piezo accelerometers
- There is a huge peak at 24Hz on the sample vibration but not on the granite vibration
- The peak is really sharp, could this be due to magnetic effect?
- Should redo the measurement with piezo accelerometers.
#+end_important