2019-07-05 10:16:33 +02:00
#+TITLE : Modal Analysis - Processing of FRF
:DRAWER:
#+STARTUP : overview
#+LANGUAGE : en
#+EMAIL : dehaeze.thomas@gmail.com
#+AUTHOR : Dehaeze Thomas
#+HTML_LINK_HOME : ../index.html
#+HTML_LINK_UP : ./index.html
#+HTML_HEAD : <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../css/htmlize.css"/>
#+HTML_HEAD : <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../css/readtheorg.css"/>
#+HTML_HEAD : <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../css/zenburn.css"/>
#+HTML_HEAD : <script type="text/javascript" src="../js/jquery.min.js"></script>
#+HTML_HEAD : <script type="text/javascript" src="../js/bootstrap.min.js"></script>
#+HTML_HEAD : <script type="text/javascript" src="../js/jquery.stickytableheaders.min.js"></script>
#+HTML_HEAD : <script type="text/javascript" src="../js/readtheorg.js"></script>
#+HTML_MATHJAX : align: center tagside: right font: TeX
#+PROPERTY : header-args:matlab :session *MATLAB*
#+PROPERTY : header-args:matlab+ :comments org
#+PROPERTY : header-args:matlab+ :results none
#+PROPERTY : header-args:matlab+ :exports both
#+PROPERTY : header-args:matlab+ :eval no-export
#+PROPERTY : header-args:matlab+ :output-dir figs
2019-07-05 11:20:02 +02:00
#+PROPERTY : header-args:matlab+ :tangle matlab/frf_processing.m
#+PROPERTY : header-args:matlab+ :mkdirp yes
2019-07-05 10:16:33 +02:00
#+PROPERTY : header-args:shell :eval no-export
#+PROPERTY : header-args:latex :headers '("\\usepackage{tikz}" "\\usepackage{import}" "\\import{$HOME/MEGA/These/LaTeX/}{config.tex}")
#+PROPERTY : header-args:latex+ :imagemagick t :fit yes
#+PROPERTY : header-args:latex+ :iminoptions -scale 100% -density 150
#+PROPERTY : header-args:latex+ :imoutoptions -quality 100
#+PROPERTY : header-args:latex+ :results raw replace :buffer no
#+PROPERTY : header-args:latex+ :eval no-export
#+PROPERTY : header-args:latex+ :exports both
#+PROPERTY : header-args:latex+ :mkdirp yes
#+PROPERTY : header-args:latex+ :output-dir figs
:END:
The measurements have been conducted and we have computed the $n \times p \times q$ Frequency Response Functions Matrix with:
- $n$: the number of measurements: $23 \times 3 = 69$ (23 accelerometers measuring 3 directions each)
- $p$: the number of excitation inputs: $3$
- $q$: the number of frequency points $\omega_i$
However, in our model, we only consider 6 solid bodies, namely:
- Bottom Granite
- Top Granite
- Translation Stage
- Tilt Stage
- Spindle
- Hexapod
Thus, we are only interested in $6 \times 6 = 36$ degrees of freedom.
We here process the FRF matrix to go from the 69 measured DOFs to the wanted 36 DOFs.
2019-07-05 11:20:02 +02:00
* ZIP file containing the data and matlab files :ignore:
#+begin_src bash :exports none :results none
if [ matlab/frf_processing.m -nt data/frf_processing.zip ]; then
cp matlab/frf_processing.m frf_processing.m;
zip data/frf_processing \
mat/frf_coh_matrices.mat \
mat/geometry.mat \
frf_processing.m
rm frf_processing.m;
fi
#+end_src
#+begin_note
All the files (data and Matlab scripts) are accessible [[file:data/frf_processing.zip ][here ]].
#+end_note
2019-07-05 10:16:33 +02:00
* Matlab Init :noexport:ignore:
#+begin_src matlab :tangle no :exports none :results silent :noweb yes :var current_dir=(file-name-directory buffer-file-name)
<<matlab-dir >>
#+end_src
#+begin_src matlab :exports none :results silent :noweb yes
<<matlab-init >>
#+end_src
* Importation of measured FRF curves
We load the measured FRF and Coherence matrices.
We also load the geometric parameters of the station: solid bodies considered and the position of the accelerometers.
#+begin_src matlab
2019-07-05 11:20:02 +02:00
load('mat/frf_coh_matrices.mat', 'FRFs', 'COHs', 'freqs');
2019-07-05 10:16:33 +02:00
load('mat/geometry.mat', 'solids', 'solid_names', 'acc_pos');
#+end_src
* From accelerometer DOFs to solid body DOFs - Mathematics
Let's consider the schematic shown on figure [[fig:local_to_global_coordinates ]] where we are measuring the motion of a (supposed) solid body at 4 distinct points in x-y-z.
The goal here is to link these $4 \times 3 = 12$ measurements to the 6 DOFs of the solid body expressed in the frame $\{O\}$.
#+begin_src latex :file local_to_global_coordinates.pdf :post pdf2svg(file=*this*, ext= "png") :exports results
\newcommand\irregularcircle[2]{% radius, irregularity
\pgfextra {\pgfmathsetmacro\len{(#1)+rand*(#2)}}
+(0:\len pt)
\foreach \a in {10,20,...,350}{
\pgfextra {\pgfmathsetmacro\len{(#1)+rand*(#2)}}
-- +(\a:\len pt)
} -- cycle
}
\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw[rounded corners=1mm, fill=blue!30!white] (0, 0) \irregularcircle{3cm}{1mm};
\node[] (origin) at (4, -1) {$\bullet$};
\begin{scope}[shift={(origin)}]
\def\axissize{0.8cm}
\draw[->] (0, 0) -- ++(\axissize, 0) node[above left]{$x$};
\draw[->] (0, 0) -- ++(0, \axissize) node[below right]{$y$};
\draw[fill, color=black] (0, 0) circle (0.05*\axissize);
\node[draw, circle, inner sep=0pt, minimum size=0.4*\axissize, label=left:$z$] (yaxis) at (0, 0){};
\node[below right] at (0, 0){$\{O\}$};
\end{scope}
\coordinate[] (p1) at (-1.5, -1.5);
\coordinate[] (p2) at (-1.5, 1.5);
\coordinate[] (p3) at ( 1.5, 1.5);
\coordinate[] (p4) at ( 1.5, -1.5);
\draw[->] (p1)node[]{$\bullet$}node[above]{$p_1$} -- ++(1, 0.5)node[right]{$v_1$};
\draw[->] (p2)node[]{$\bullet$}node[above]{$p_2$} -- ++(-0.5, 1)node[right]{$v_2$};
\draw[->] (p3)node[]{$\bullet$}node[above]{$p_3$} -- ++(1, 0.5)node[right]{$v_3$};
\draw[->] (p4)node[]{$\bullet$}node[above]{$p_4$} -- ++(0.5, 1)node[right]{$v_4$};
\end{tikzpicture}
#+end_src
#+name : fig:local_to_global_coordinates
#+caption : Schematic of the measured motions of a solid body
#+RESULTS :
[[file:figs/local_to_global_coordinates.png ]]
From the figure [[fig:local_to_global_coordinates ]], we can write:
\begin{align*}
\vec{v}_1 &= \vec{v} + \Omega \vec{p}_1\\
\vec{v}_2 &= \vec{v} + \Omega \vec{p}_2\\
\vec{v}_3 &= \vec{v} + \Omega \vec{p}_3\\
\vec{v}_4 &= \vec{v} + \Omega \vec{p}_4
\end{align*}
With
\begin{equation}
\Omega = \begin{bmatrix}
0 & -\Omega_z & \Omega_y \\
\Omega_z & 0 & -\Omega_x \\
-\Omega_y & \Omega_x & 0
\end{bmatrix}
\end{equation}
$\vec{v}$ and $\Omega$ represent to velocity and rotation of the solid expressed in the frame $\{O\}$.
We can rearrange the equations in a matrix form:
\begin{equation}
\left[\begin{array}{ccc|ccc}
1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & p_{1z} & -p_ {1y} \\
0 & 1 & 0 & -p_{1z} & 0 & p_ {1x} \\
0 & 0 & 1 & p_{1y} & -p_ {1x} & 0 \\ \hline
& \vdots & & & \vdots & \\ \hline
1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & p_{4z} & -p_ {4y} \\
0 & 1 & 0 & -p_{4z} & 0 & p_ {4x} \\
0 & 0 & 1 & p_{4y} & -p_ {4x} & 0
\end{array}\right] \begin{bmatrix}
v_x \\ v_y \\ v_z \\ \hline \Omega_x \\ \Omega_y \\ \Omega_z
\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}
v_{1x} \\ v_ {1y} \\ v_{1z} \\\hline \vdots \\\hline v_ {4x} \\ v_{4y} \\ v_ {4z}
\end{bmatrix}
\end{equation}
and then we obtain the velocity and rotation of the solid in the wanted frame $\{O\}$:
\begin{equation}
\begin{bmatrix}
v_x \\ v_y \\ v_z \\ \hline \Omega_x \\ \Omega_y \\ \Omega_z
\end{bmatrix} =
\left[\begin{array}{ccc|ccc}
1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & p_{1z} & -p_ {1y} \\
0 & 1 & 0 & -p_{1z} & 0 & p_ {1x} \\
0 & 0 & 1 & p_{1y} & -p_ {1x} & 0 \\ \hline
& \vdots & & & \vdots & \\ \hline
1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & p_{4z} & -p_ {4y} \\
0 & 1 & 0 & -p_{4z} & 0 & p_ {4x} \\
0 & 0 & 1 & p_{4y} & -p_ {4x} & 0
\end{array}\right]^{-1} \begin{bmatrix}
v_{1x} \\ v_ {1y} \\ v_{1z} \\\hline \vdots \\\hline v_ {4x} \\ v_{4y} \\ v_ {4z}
\end{bmatrix}
\end{equation}
This inversion is equivalent to resolving a mean square problem.
* What reference frame to choose?
The question we wish here to answer is how to choose the reference frame $\{O\}$ in which the DOFs of the solid bodies are defined.
The goal is to compare the motion of each solid body to see which relative DOFs between solid bodies can be neglected, that is to say, which joint between solid bodies can be regarded as perfect (and this in all the frequency range of interest).
Ideally, we would like to have the same number of degrees of freedom than the number of identified modes.
The possibles choices are:
- *One frame for each solid body* which is located at its center of mass
- *One common frame* , for instance located at the point of interest ($270mm$ above the Hexapod)
- *Base located at the joint position* : this is where we want to see the motion and estimate stiffness
#+name : tab:frame_comparison
#+caption : Advantages and disadvantages for the choice of reference frame
| Chosen Frame | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|--------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------|
| Frames at CoM | Physically, it makes more sense | How to compare the motion of the solid bodies? |
| Common Frame | We can compare the motion of each solid body | Small $\theta_{x, y}$ may result in large $T_{x, y}$ |
| Frames at joint position | Directly gives which joint direction can be blocked | How to choose the joint position? |
As the easiest choice is to choose a common frame, we start with that solution.
* From accelerometer DOFs to solid body DOFs - Matlab Implementation
First, we initialize a new FRF matrix =FRFs_O= which is an $n \times p \times q$ with:
- $n$ is the number of DOFs of the considered 6 solid-bodies: $6 \times 6 = 36$
- $p$ is the number of excitation inputs: $3$
- $q$ is the number of frequency points $\omega_i$
2019-07-05 11:20:02 +02:00
#+begin_important
For each frequency point $\omega_i$, the FRF matrix =FRFs_O= is a $n\times p$ matrix:
\begin{equation}
\text{FRF}_O(\omega_i) = \begin{bmatrix}
\frac{D_{1,T_x}}{F_x}(\omega_i) & \frac{D_ {1,T_x}}{F_y}(\omega_i) & \frac{D_ {1,T_x}}{F_z}(\omega_i) \\
\frac{D_{1,T_y}}{F_x}(\omega_i) & \frac{D_ {1,T_y}}{F_y}(\omega_i) & \frac{D_ {1,T_y}}{F_z}(\omega_i) \\
\frac{D_{1,T_z}}{F_x}(\omega_i) & \frac{D_ {1,T_z}}{F_y}(\omega_i) & \frac{D_ {1,T_z}}{F_z}(\omega_i) \\
\frac{D_{1,R_x}}{F_x}(\omega_i) & \frac{D_ {1,R_x}}{F_y}(\omega_i) & \frac{D_ {1,R_x}}{F_z}(\omega_i) \\
\frac{D_{1,R_y}}{F_x}(\omega_i) & \frac{D_ {1,R_y}}{F_y}(\omega_i) & \frac{D_ {1,R_y}}{F_z}(\omega_i) \\
\frac{D_{1,R_z}}{F_x}(\omega_i) & \frac{D_ {1,R_z}}{F_y}(\omega_i) & \frac{D_ {1,R_z}}{F_z}(\omega_i) \\
\frac{D_{2,T_x}}{F_x}(\omega_i) & \frac{D_ {2,T_x}}{F_y}(\omega_i) & \frac{D_ {2,T_x}}{F_z}(\omega_i) \\
\vdots & \vdots & \vdots \\
\frac{D_{6,R_z}}{F_x}(\omega_i) & \frac{D_ {6,R_z}}{F_y}(\omega_i) & \frac{D_ {6,R_z}}{F_z}(\omega_i)
\end{bmatrix}
\end{equation}
where 1, 2, ..., 6 corresponds to the 6 solid bodies.
#+end_important
2019-07-05 10:16:33 +02:00
#+begin_src matlab
FRFs_O = zeros(length(solid_names)*6, 3, 801);
#+end_src
Then, as we know the positions of the accelerometers on each solid body, and we have the response of those accelerometers, we can use the equations derived in the previous section to determine the response of each solid body expressed in the frame $\{O\}$.
#+begin_src matlab
for solid_i = 1:length(solid_names)
solids_i = solids.(solid_names{solid_i});
A = zeros(3*length(solids_i), 6);
for i = 1:length(solids_i)
acc_i = solids_i(i);
A(3*(i-1)+1:3*i, 1:3) = eye(3);
A(3*(i-1)+1:3*i, 4:6) = [ 0 acc_pos(acc_i, 3) -acc_pos(acc_i, 2) ;
-acc_pos(acc_i, 3) 0 acc_pos(acc_i, 1) ;
acc_pos(acc_i, 2) -acc_pos(acc_i, 1) 0];
end
for exc_dir = 1:3
FRFs_O((solid_i-1)*6+1:solid_i*6, exc_dir, :) = A\squeeze(FRFs((solids_i(1)-1)*3+1:solids_i(end)*3, exc_dir, :));
end
end
#+end_src
* Analysis of some FRF in the global coordinates
First, we can compare the motions of the 6 solid bodies in one direction (figure [[fig:frf_all_bodies_one_direction ]])
We can also compare all the DOFs of one solid body (figure [[fig:frf_one_body_all_directions ]]).
#+begin_src matlab :exports none
exc_names = {'$F_x$', '$F_y$', '$F_z$'};
2019-07-05 11:20:02 +02:00
DOFs = {'$T_x$', '$T_y$', '$T_z$', '$\theta_x$', '$\theta_y$', '$\theta_z$'};
2019-07-05 10:16:33 +02:00
solids_i = 1:6;
dir_i = 1;
exc_dir = 1;
figure;
ax1 = subaxis(2, 1, 1);
hold on;
for solid_i = solids_i
plot(freqs, abs(squeeze(FRFs_O((solid_i-1)*6+dir_i, exc_dir, :))), 'DisplayName', solid_names{solid_i});
end
hold off;
set(gca, 'XScale', 'log'); set(gca, 'YScale', 'log');
set(gca, 'XTickLabel',[]);
ylabel('Amplitude');
legend('Location', 'northwest');
title(sprintf('FRF between %s and %s', exc_names{exc_dir}, DOFs{dir_i}));
ax2 = subaxis(2, 1, 2);
hold on;
for solid_i = solids_i
plot(freqs, mod(180+180/pi*phase(squeeze(FRFs_O((solid_i-1)*6+dir_i, exc_dir, :))), 360)-180);
end
hold off;
ylim([-180, 180]); yticks(-180:90:180);
xlabel('Frequency [Hz]'); ylabel('Phase [deg]');
set(gca, 'xscale', 'log');
linkaxes([ax1,ax2],'x');
xlim([1, 200]);
#+end_src
#+HEADER : :tangle no :exports results :results none :noweb yes
#+begin_src matlab :var filepath="figs/frf_all_bodies_one_direction.pdf" :var figsize= "full-tall" :post pdf2svg(file=*this*, ext= "png")
<<plt-matlab >>
#+end_src
#+NAME : fig:frf_all_bodies_one_direction
#+CAPTION : FRFs of all the 6 solid bodies in one direction
[[file:figs/frf_all_bodies_one_direction.png ]]
#+begin_src matlab :exports none
2019-07-05 11:20:02 +02:00
DOFs = {'$T_x$', '$T_y$', '$T_z$', '$\theta_x$', '$\theta_y$', '$\theta_z$'};
2019-07-05 10:16:33 +02:00
solid_i = 3;
dirs_i = 1:6;
exc_dir = 1;
figure;
ax1 = subplot(2, 1, 1);
hold on;
for dir_i = dirs_i
plot(freqs, abs(squeeze(FRFs_O((solid_i-1)*6+dir_i, exc_dir, :))), 'DisplayName', DOFs{dir_i});
end
hold off;
set(gca, 'XScale', 'log'); set(gca, 'YScale', 'log');
set(gca, 'XTickLabel',[]);
ylabel('Amplitude');
legend('Location', 'northwest');
title(sprintf('Motion of %s due to %s', solid_names{solid_i}, exc_names{exc_dir}));
ax2 = subplot(2, 1, 2);
hold on;
for dir_i = dirs_i
plot(freqs, mod(180+180/pi*phase(squeeze(FRFs_O((solid_i-1)*6+dir_i, exc_dir, :))), 360)-180);
end
hold off;
ylim([-180, 180]); yticks(-180:90:180);
xlabel('Frequency [Hz]'); ylabel('Phase [deg]');
set(gca, 'xscale', 'log');
linkaxes([ax1,ax2],'x');
xlim([1, 200]);
#+end_src
#+HEADER : :tangle no :exports results :results none :noweb yes
#+begin_src matlab :var filepath="figs/frf_one_body_all_directions.pdf" :var figsize= "full-tall" :post pdf2svg(file=*this*, ext= "png")
<<plt-matlab >>
#+end_src
#+NAME : fig:frf_one_body_all_directions
#+CAPTION : FRFs of one solid body in all its DOFs
[[file:figs/frf_one_body_all_directions.png ]]
2019-07-05 11:20:02 +02:00
* Comparison of the relative motion of solid bodies
Now that the motion of all the solid bodies are expressed in the same frame, we should be able to *compare them* .
This can be used to determine what joints direction between two solid bodies is stiff enough that we can fix this DoF.
This could help reduce the order of the model and simplify the extraction of the model parameters from the measurements.
2019-07-05 10:16:33 +02:00
2019-07-05 11:20:02 +02:00
We decide to plot the "normalized relative motion" between solid bodies $i$ and $j$:
\[ 0 < \Delta_{ij, x} = \frac{\left| D_ {i,x} - D_{j,x} \right|}{|D_ {i,x}| + |D_{j,x}|} < 1 \]
2019-07-05 10:16:33 +02:00
2019-07-05 11:20:02 +02:00
Then, if $\Delta_{ij,x} \ll 0$ in the frequency band of interest, we have that $D_ {ix} \approx D_{jx}$ and we can neglect that DOF between the two solid bodies $i$ and $j$.
2019-07-05 10:16:33 +02:00
2019-07-05 11:20:02 +02:00
This normalized relative motion is shown on figure [[fig:relative_motion_comparison ]] for all the directions and for all the adjacent pair of solid bodies.
2019-07-05 10:16:33 +02:00
2019-07-05 11:20:02 +02:00
#+begin_src matlab :exports none
DOFs = {'$T_x$', '$T_y$', '$T_z$', '$\theta_x$', '$\theta_y$', '$\theta_z$'};
2019-07-05 10:16:33 +02:00
dirs_i = 1:6;
exc_dir = 1;
figure;
for i = 2:6
subaxis(3, 2, i);
hold on;
for dir_i = dirs_i
H = (squeeze(FRFs_O((i-1)*6+dir_i, exc_dir, :))-squeeze(FRFs_O((i-2)*6+dir_i, exc_dir, :)))./(abs(squeeze(FRFs_O((i-1)*6+dir_i, exc_dir, :)))+abs(squeeze(FRFs_O((i-2)*6+dir_i, exc_dir, :))));
plot(freqs, abs(H));
end
hold off;
set(gca, 'XScale', 'log'); set(gca, 'YScale', 'lin');
xlim([1, 200]); ylim([0, 1]);
% xlabel('Frequency [Hz]'); ylabel('Relative Motion');
title(sprintf('Normalized motion %s - %s', solid_names{i-1}, solid_names{i}));
if i > 4
xlabel('Frequency [Hz]');
else
set(gca, 'XTickLabel',[]);
end
end
for i = 1:length(dirs_i)
legend_names{i} = DOFs{dirs_i(i)};
end
lgd = legend(legend_names);
hL = subplot(3, 2, 1);
poshL = get(hL,'position');
set(lgd,'position', poshL);
axis(hL, 'off');
#+end_src
#+HEADER : :tangle no :exports results :results none :noweb yes
#+begin_src matlab :var filepath="figs/relative_motion_comparison.pdf" :var figsize= "full-tall" :post pdf2svg(file=*this*, ext= "png")
<<plt-matlab >>
#+end_src
#+NAME : fig:relative_motion_comparison
#+CAPTION : Relative motion between each stage
[[file:figs/relative_motion_comparison.png ]]
2019-07-05 11:20:02 +02:00
#+begin_warning
Can we really compare the motion of two solid bodies from Frequency Response Functions that clearly depends on the excitation point and direction?
The relative motion of two solid bodies may be negligible when exciting the structure at on point and but at another point.
#+end_warning
2019-07-05 10:16:33 +02:00
* Verify that we find the original FRF from the FRF in the global coordinates
We have computed the Frequency Response Functions Matrix =FRFs_O= representing the response of the 6 solid bodies in their 6 DOFs.
From the response of one body in its 6 DOFs, we should be able to compute the FRF of each of its accelerometer fixed to it during the measurement.
We can then compare the result with the original measurements.
This will help us to determine if:
- the previous inversion used is correct
- the solid body assumption is correct in the frequency band of interest
#+begin_src matlab
FRF_recovered = zeros(size(FRFs));
% For each excitation direction
for exc_dir = 1:3
% For each solid
for solid_i = 1:length(solid_names)
v0 = squeeze(FRFs_O((solid_i-1)*6+1:(solid_i-1)*6+3, exc_dir, :));
W0 = squeeze(FRFs_O((solid_i-1)*6+4:(solid_i-1)*6+6, exc_dir, :));
% For each accelerometer attached to the current solid
for acc_i = solids.(solid_names{solid_i})
% We get the position of the accelerometer expressed in frame O
pos = acc_pos(acc_i, :)';
posX = [0 pos(3) -pos(2); -pos(3) 0 pos(1) ; pos(2) -pos(1) 0];
FRF_recovered(3*(acc_i-1)+1:3* (acc_i-1)+3, exc_dir, :) = v0 + posX*W0;
end
end
end
#+end_src
We then compare the original FRF measured for each accelerometer with the recovered FRF from the global FRF matrix in the common frame.
The FRF for the 4 accelerometers on the Hexapod are compared on figure [[fig:recovered_frf_comparison_hexa ]].
All the FRF are matching very well in all the frequency range displayed.
The FRF for accelerometers located on the translation stage are compared on figure [[fig:recovered_frf_comparison_ty ]].
The FRF are matching well until 100Hz.
#+begin_src matlab :exports none
exc_names = {'$F_x$', '$F_y$', '$F_z$'};
2019-07-05 11:20:02 +02:00
DOFs = {'$T_x$', '$T_y$', '$T_z$', '$\theta_x$', '$\theta_y$', '$\theta_z$'};
2019-07-05 10:16:33 +02:00
solid_i = 6;
exc_dir = 1;
accs_i = solids.(solid_names{solid_i});
figure;
for i = 1:length(accs_i)
acc_i = accs_i(i);
subaxis(2, 2, i);
hold on;
for dir_i = 1:3
plot(freqs, abs(squeeze(FRFs(3*(acc_i-1)+dir_i, exc_dir, :))), '-', 'DisplayName', DOFs{dir_i});
end
set(gca,'ColorOrderIndex',1)
for dir_i = 1:3
plot(freqs, abs(squeeze(FRF_recovered(3*(acc_i-1)+dir_i, exc_dir, :))), '--', 'HandleVisibility', 'off');
end
hold off;
set(gca, 'XScale', 'log'); set(gca, 'YScale', 'log');
if i > 2
xlabel('Frequency [Hz]');
else
set(gca, 'XTickLabel',[]);
end
if rem(i, 2) == 1
ylabel('Amplitude');
end
xlim([1, 200]);
title(sprintf('Accelerometer %i', accs_i(i)));
legend('location', 'northwest');
end
#+end_src
#+HEADER : :tangle no :exports results :results none :noweb yes
#+begin_src matlab :var filepath="figs/recovered_frf_comparison_hexa.pdf" :var figsize= "full-tall" :post pdf2svg(file=*this*, ext= "png")
<<plt-matlab >>
#+end_src
#+NAME : fig:recovered_frf_comparison_hexa
#+CAPTION : Comparison of the original FRF with the recovered ones - Hexapod
[[file:figs/recovered_frf_comparison_hexa.png ]]
#+begin_src matlab :exports none
exc_names = {'$F_x$', '$F_y$', '$F_z$'};
2019-07-05 11:20:02 +02:00
DOFs = {'$T_x$', '$T_y$', '$T_z$', '$\theta_x$', '$\theta_y$', '$\theta_z$'};
2019-07-05 10:16:33 +02:00
solid_i = 3;
exc_dir = 1;
accs_i = solids.(solid_names{solid_i});
figure;
for i = 1:length(accs_i)
acc_i = accs_i(i);
subaxis(2, 2, i);
hold on;
for dir_i = 1:3
plot(freqs, abs(squeeze(FRFs(3*(acc_i-1)+dir_i, exc_dir, :))), '-', 'DisplayName', DOFs{dir_i});
end
set(gca,'ColorOrderIndex',1)
for dir_i = 1:3
plot(freqs, abs(squeeze(FRF_recovered(3*(acc_i-1)+dir_i, exc_dir, :))), '--', 'HandleVisibility', 'off');
end
hold off;
set(gca, 'XScale', 'log'); set(gca, 'YScale', 'log');
if i > 2
xlabel('Frequency [Hz]');
else
set(gca, 'XTickLabel',[]);
end
if rem(i, 2) == 1
ylabel('Amplitude');
end
xlim([1, 200]);
title(sprintf('Accelerometer %i', accs_i(i)));
legend('location', 'northwest');
end
#+end_src
#+HEADER : :tangle no :exports results :results none :noweb yes
#+begin_src matlab :var filepath="figs/recovered_frf_comparison_ty.pdf" :var figsize= "full-tall" :post pdf2svg(file=*this*, ext= "png")
<<plt-matlab >>
#+end_src
#+NAME : fig:recovered_frf_comparison_ty
#+CAPTION : Comparison of the original FRF with the recovered ones - Ty
[[file:figs/recovered_frf_comparison_ty.png ]]
#+begin_important
The reduction of the number of degrees of freedom from 69 (23 accelerometers with each 3DOF) to 36 (6 solid bodies with 6 DOF) seems to work well.
This confirms the fact that the stages are indeed behaving as a solid body in the frequency band of interest.
This valid the fact that a multi-body model can be used to represent the dynamics of the micro-station.
#+end_important
2019-07-05 11:20:02 +02:00
* Saving of the FRF expressed in the global coordinates
2019-07-05 10:16:33 +02:00
#+begin_src matlab
2019-07-05 11:20:02 +02:00
save('mat/frf_o.mat', 'FRFs_O');
2019-07-05 10:16:33 +02:00
#+end_src
