UP | HOME

SVD Control

Table of Contents

1 Gravimeter - Simscape Model

1.1 Introduction

gravimeter_model.png

Figure 1: Model of the gravimeter

1.2 Simscape Model - Parameters

open('gravimeter.slx')

Parameters

l  = 1.0; % Length of the mass [m]
h  = 1.7; % Height of the mass [m]

la = l/2; % Position of Act. [m]
ha = h/2; % Position of Act. [m]

m = 400; % Mass [kg]
I = 115; % Inertia [kg m^2]

k = 15e3; % Actuator Stiffness [N/m]
c = 0.03; % Actuator Damping [N/(m/s)]

deq = 0.2; % Length of the actuators [m]

g = 0; % Gravity [m/s2]

1.3 System Identification - Without Gravity

%% Name of the Simulink File
mdl = 'gravimeter';

%% Input/Output definition
clear io; io_i = 1;
io(io_i) = linio([mdl, '/F1'], 1, 'openinput');  io_i = io_i + 1;
io(io_i) = linio([mdl, '/F2'], 1, 'openinput');  io_i = io_i + 1;
io(io_i) = linio([mdl, '/F3'], 1, 'openinput');  io_i = io_i + 1;
io(io_i) = linio([mdl, '/Acc_side'], 1, 'openoutput'); io_i = io_i + 1;
io(io_i) = linio([mdl, '/Acc_side'], 2, 'openoutput'); io_i = io_i + 1;
io(io_i) = linio([mdl, '/Acc_top'], 1, 'openoutput'); io_i = io_i + 1;
io(io_i) = linio([mdl, '/Acc_top'], 2, 'openoutput'); io_i = io_i + 1;

G = linearize(mdl, io);
G.InputName  = {'F1', 'F2', 'F3'};
G.OutputName = {'Ax1', 'Az1', 'Ax2', 'Az2'};

The inputs and outputs of the plant are shown in Figure 2.

gravimeter_plant_schematic.png

Figure 2: Schematic of the gravimeter plant

\begin{equation} \bm{a} = \begin{bmatrix} a_{1x} \\ a_{1z} \\ a_{2x} \\ a_{2z} \end{bmatrix} \end{equation} \begin{equation} \bm{\tau} = \begin{bmatrix}\tau_1 \\ \tau_2 \\ \tau_2 \end{bmatrix} \end{equation}

We can check the poles of the plant:

-0.000183495485977108 +       13.546056874877i
-0.000183495485977108 -       13.546056874877i
-7.49842878906757e-05 +      8.65934902322567i
-7.49842878906757e-05 -      8.65934902322567i
-1.33171230256362e-05 +      3.64924169037897i
-1.33171230256362e-05 -      3.64924169037897i

The plant as 6 states as expected (2 translations + 1 rotation)

size(G)
State-space model with 4 outputs, 3 inputs, and 6 states.

The bode plot of all elements of the plant are shown in Figure 3.

open_loop_tf.png

Figure 3: Open Loop Transfer Function from 3 Actuators to 4 Accelerometers

1.4 Physical Decoupling using the Jacobian

Consider the control architecture shown in Figure 4.

The Jacobian matrix \(J_{\tau}\) is used to transform forces applied by the three actuators into forces/torques applied on the gravimeter at its center of mass. The Jacobian matrix \(J_{a}\) is used to compute the vertical acceleration, horizontal acceleration and rotational acceleration of the mass with respect to its center of mass.

We thus define a new plant as defined in Figure 4. \[ G_x(s) = J_a G(s) J_{\tau}^{-T} \]

\(G_x(s)\) correspond to the transfer function from forces and torques applied to the gravimeter at its center of mass to the absolute acceleration of the gravimeter’s center of mass.

gravimeter_decouple_jacobian.png

Figure 4: Decoupled plant \(\bm{G}_x\) using the Jacobian matrix \(J\)

The jacobian corresponding to the sensors and actuators are defined below.

Ja = [1 0  h/2
      0 1 -l/2
      1 0 -h/2
      0 1  0];

Jt = [1 0  ha
      0 1 -la
      0 1  la];
Gx = pinv(Ja)*G*pinv(Jt');
Gx.InputName  = {'Fx', 'Fz', 'My'};
Gx.OutputName  = {'Dx', 'Dz', 'Ry'};

The diagonal and off-diagonal elements of \(G_x\) are shown in Figure 5.

gravimeter_jacobian_plant.png

Figure 5: Diagonal and off-diagonal elements of \(G_x\)

1.5 Real Approximation of \(G\) at the decoupling frequency

Let’s compute a real approximation of the complex matrix \(H_1\) which corresponds to the the transfer function \(G_u(j\omega_c)\) from forces applied by the actuators to the measured acceleration of the top platform evaluated at the frequency \(\omega_c\).

wc = 2*pi*10; % Decoupling frequency [rad/s]

H1 = evalfr(G, j*wc);

The real approximation is computed as follows:

D = pinv(real(H1'*H1));
H1 = inv(D*real(H1'*diag(exp(j*angle(diag(H1*D*H1.'))/2))));
Table 1: Real approximate of \(G\) at the decoupling frequency \(\omega_c\)
0.0026 -3.7e-05 3.7e-05
1.9e-10 0.0025 0.0025
-0.0078 0.0045 -0.0045

1.6 SVD Decoupling

First, the Singular Value Decomposition of \(H_1\) is performed: \[ H_1 = U \Sigma V^H \]

[U,~,V] = svd(H1);

The obtained matrices \(U\) and \(V\) are used to decouple the system as shown in Figure 6.

gravimeter_decouple_svd.png

Figure 6: Decoupled plant \(\bm{G}_{SVD}\) using the Singular Value Decomposition

The decoupled plant is then: \[ G_{SVD}(s) = U^{-1} G_u(s) V^{-H} \]

Gsvd = inv(U)*G*inv(V');

The diagonal and off-diagonal elements of the “SVD” plant are shown in Figure 7.

gravimeter_svd_plant.png

Figure 7: Diagonal and off-diagonal elements of \(G_{svd}\)

1.7 Verification of the decoupling using the “Gershgorin Radii”

The “Gershgorin Radii” is computed for the coupled plant \(G(s)\), for the “Jacobian plant” \(G_x(s)\) and the “SVD Decoupled Plant” \(G_{SVD}(s)\):

The “Gershgorin Radii” of a matrix \(S\) is defined by: \[ \zeta_i(j\omega) = \frac{\sum\limits_{j\neq i}|S_{ij}(j\omega)|}{|S_{ii}(j\omega)|} \]

This is computed over the following frequencies.

freqs = logspace(-2, 2, 1000); % [Hz]

simscape_model_gershgorin_radii.png

Figure 8: Gershgorin Radii of the Coupled and Decoupled plants

1.8 Obtained Decoupled Plants

The bode plot of the diagonal and off-diagonal elements of \(G_{SVD}\) are shown in Figure 9.

simscape_model_decoupled_plant_svd.png

Figure 9: Decoupled Plant using SVD

Similarly, the bode plots of the diagonal elements and off-diagonal elements of the decoupled plant \(G_x(s)\) using the Jacobian are shown in Figure 10.

simscape_model_decoupled_plant_jacobian.png

Figure 10: Gravimeter Platform Plant from forces (resp. torques) applied by the legs to the acceleration (resp. angular acceleration) of the platform as well as all the coupling terms between the two (non-diagonal terms of the transfer function matrix)

1.9 Diagonal Controller

The control diagram for the centralized control is shown in Figure 11.

The controller \(K_c\) is “working” in an cartesian frame. The Jacobian is used to convert forces in the cartesian frame to forces applied by the actuators.

centralized_control.png

Figure 11: Control Diagram for the Centralized control

The SVD control architecture is shown in Figure 12. The matrices \(U\) and \(V\) are used to decoupled the plant \(G\).

svd_control.png

Figure 12: Control Diagram for the SVD control

We choose the controller to be a low pass filter: \[ K_c(s) = \frac{G_0}{1 + \frac{s}{\omega_0}} \]

\(G_0\) is tuned such that the crossover frequency corresponding to the diagonal terms of the loop gain is equal to \(\omega_c\)

wc = 2*pi*80;  % Crossover Frequency [rad/s]
w0 = 2*pi*0.1; % Controller Pole [rad/s]
K_cen = diag(1./diag(abs(evalfr(Gx, j*wc))))*(1/abs(evalfr(1/(1 + s/w0), j*wc)))/(1 + s/w0);
L_cen = K_cen*Gx;
G_cen = feedback(G, pinv(J')*K_cen, [7:12], [1:6]);
K_svd = diag(1./diag(abs(evalfr(Gsvd, j*wc))))*(1/abs(evalfr(1/(1 + s/w0), j*wc)))/(1 + s/w0);
L_svd = K_svd*Gsvd;
G_svd = feedback(G, inv(V')*K_svd*inv(U), [7:12], [1:6]);

The obtained diagonal elements of the loop gains are shown in Figure 13.

gravimeter_comp_loop_gain_diagonal.png

Figure 13: Comparison of the diagonal elements of the loop gains for the SVD control architecture and the Jacobian one

1.10 Closed-Loop system Performances

Let’s first verify the stability of the closed-loop systems:

isstable(G_cen)
ans =
  logical
   1
isstable(G_svd)
ans =
  logical
   1

The obtained transmissibility in Open-loop, for the centralized control as well as for the SVD control are shown in Figure 14.

gravimeter_platform_simscape_cl_transmissibility.png

Figure 14: Obtained Transmissibility

2 Stewart Platform - Simscape Model

In this analysis, we wish to applied SVD control to the Stewart Platform shown in Figure 15.

Some notes about the system:

  • 6 voice coils actuators are used to control the motion of the top platform.
  • the motion of the top platform is measured with a 6-axis inertial unit (3 acceleration + 3 angular accelerations)
  • the control objective is to isolate the top platform from vibrations coming from the bottom platform

SP_assembly.png

Figure 15: Stewart Platform CAD View

The analysis of the SVD control applied to the Stewart platform is performed in the following sections:

  • Section 2.1: The parameters of the Simscape model of the Stewart platform are defined
  • Section 2.2: The plant is identified from the Simscape model and the system coupling is shown
  • Section 2.3: The plant is first decoupled using the Jacobian
  • Section 2.4: A real approximation of the plant is computed for further decoupling using the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD)
  • Section 2.5: The decoupling is performed thanks to the SVD
  • Section 1.7: The effectiveness of the decoupling with the Jacobian and SVD are compared using the Gershorin Radii
  • Section 2.8: The dynamics of the decoupled plants are shown
  • Section 2.9: A diagonal controller is defined to control the decoupled plant
  • Section 2.10: Finally, the closed loop system properties are studied

2.1 Simscape Model - Parameters

open('drone_platform.slx');

Definition of spring parameters:

kx = 0.5*1e3/3; % [N/m]
ky = 0.5*1e3/3;
kz = 1e3/3;

cx = 0.025; % [Nm/rad]
cy = 0.025;
cz = 0.025;

We suppose the sensor is perfectly positioned.

sens_pos_error = zeros(3,1);

Gravity:

g = 0;

We load the Jacobian (previously computed from the geometry):

load('jacobian.mat', 'Aa', 'Ab', 'As', 'l', 'J');

We initialize other parameters:

U = eye(6);
V = eye(6);
Kc = tf(zeros(6));

stewart_simscape.png

Figure 16: General view of the Simscape Model

stewart_platform_details.png

Figure 17: Simscape model of the Stewart platform

2.2 Identification of the plant

The plant shown in Figure 18 is identified from the Simscape model.

The inputs are:

  • \(D_w\) translation and rotation of the bottom platform (with respect to the center of mass of the top platform)
  • \(\tau\) the 6 forces applied by the voice coils

The outputs are the 6 accelerations measured by the inertial unit.

stewart_platform_plant.png

Figure 18: Considered plant \(\bm{G} = \begin{bmatrix}G_d\\G_u\end{bmatrix}\). \(D_w\) is the translation/rotation of the support, \(\tau\) the actuator forces, \(a\) the acceleration/angular acceleration of the top platform

%% Name of the Simulink File
mdl = 'drone_platform';

%% Input/Output definition
clear io; io_i = 1;
io(io_i) = linio([mdl, '/Dw'],              1, 'openinput');  io_i = io_i + 1; % Ground Motion
io(io_i) = linio([mdl, '/V-T'],             1, 'openinput');  io_i = io_i + 1; % Actuator Forces
io(io_i) = linio([mdl, '/Inertial Sensor'], 1, 'openoutput'); io_i = io_i + 1; % Top platform acceleration

G = linearize(mdl, io);
G.InputName  = {'Dwx', 'Dwy', 'Dwz', 'Rwx', 'Rwy', 'Rwz', ...
                'F1', 'F2', 'F3', 'F4', 'F5', 'F6'};
G.OutputName = {'Ax', 'Ay', 'Az', 'Arx', 'Ary', 'Arz'};

% Plant
Gu = G(:, {'F1', 'F2', 'F3', 'F4', 'F5', 'F6'});
% Disturbance dynamics
Gd = G(:, {'Dwx', 'Dwy', 'Dwz', 'Rwx', 'Rwy', 'Rwz'});

There are 24 states (6dof for the bottom platform + 6dof for the top platform).

size(G)
State-space model with 6 outputs, 12 inputs, and 24 states.

The elements of the transfer matrix \(\bm{G}\) corresponding to the transfer function from actuator forces \(\tau\) to the measured acceleration \(a\) are shown in Figure 19.

One can easily see that the system is strongly coupled.

stewart_platform_coupled_plant.png

Figure 19: Magnitude of all 36 elements of the transfer function matrix \(G_u\)

2.3 Physical Decoupling using the Jacobian

Consider the control architecture shown in Figure 20. The Jacobian matrix is used to transform forces/torques applied on the top platform to the equivalent forces applied by each actuator.

The Jacobian matrix is computed from the geometry of the platform (position and orientation of the actuators).

Table 2: Computed Jacobian Matrix
0.811 0.0 0.584 -0.018 -0.008 0.025
-0.406 -0.703 0.584 -0.016 -0.012 -0.025
-0.406 0.703 0.584 0.016 -0.012 0.025
0.811 0.0 0.584 0.018 -0.008 -0.025
-0.406 -0.703 0.584 0.002 0.019 0.025
-0.406 0.703 0.584 -0.002 0.019 -0.025

plant_decouple_jacobian.png

Figure 20: Decoupled plant \(\bm{G}_x\) using the Jacobian matrix \(J\)

We define a new plant: \[ G_x(s) = G(s) J^{-T} \]

\(G_x(s)\) correspond to the transfer function from forces and torques applied to the top platform to the absolute acceleration of the top platform.

Gx = Gu*inv(J');
Gx.InputName  = {'Fx', 'Fy', 'Fz', 'Mx', 'My', 'Mz'};

2.4 Real Approximation of \(G\) at the decoupling frequency

Let’s compute a real approximation of the complex matrix \(H_1\) which corresponds to the the transfer function \(G_u(j\omega_c)\) from forces applied by the actuators to the measured acceleration of the top platform evaluated at the frequency \(\omega_c\).

wc = 2*pi*30; % Decoupling frequency [rad/s]

H1 = evalfr(Gu, j*wc);

The real approximation is computed as follows:

D = pinv(real(H1'*H1));
H1 = inv(D*real(H1'*diag(exp(j*angle(diag(H1*D*H1.'))/2))));
Table 3: Real approximate of \(G\) at the decoupling frequency \(\omega_c\)
4.4 -2.1 -2.1 4.4 -2.4 -2.4
-0.2 -3.9 3.9 0.2 -3.8 3.8
3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4
-367.1 -323.8 323.8 367.1 43.3 -43.3
-162.0 -237.0 -237.0 -162.0 398.9 398.9
220.6 -220.6 220.6 -220.6 220.6 -220.6

Note that the plant \(G_u\) at \(\omega_c\) is already an almost real matrix. This can be seen on the Bode plots where the phase is close to 1. This can be verified below where only the real value of \(G_u(\omega_c)\) is shown

Table 4: Real part of \(G\) at the decoupling frequency \(\omega_c\)
4.4 -2.1 -2.1 4.4 -2.4 -2.4
-0.2 -3.9 3.9 0.2 -3.8 3.8
3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4
-367.1 -323.8 323.8 367.1 43.3 -43.3
-162.0 -237.0 -237.0 -162.0 398.9 398.9
220.6 -220.6 220.6 -220.6 220.6 -220.6

2.5 SVD Decoupling

First, the Singular Value Decomposition of \(H_1\) is performed: \[ H_1 = U \Sigma V^H \]

[U,~,V] = svd(H1);
Table 5: Obtained matrix \(U\)
-0.005 7e-06 6e-11 -3e-06 -1 0.1
-7e-06 -0.005 -9e-09 -5e-09 -0.1 -1
4e-08 -2e-10 -6e-11 -1 3e-06 -3e-07
-0.002 -1 -5e-06 2e-10 0.0006 0.005
1 -0.002 -1e-08 2e-08 -0.005 0.0006
-4e-09 5e-06 -1 6e-11 -2e-09 -1e-08
Table 6: Obtained matrix \(V\)
-0.2 0.5 -0.4 -0.4 -0.6 -0.2
-0.3 0.5 0.4 -0.4 0.5 0.3
-0.3 -0.5 -0.4 -0.4 0.4 -0.4
-0.2 -0.5 0.4 -0.4 -0.5 0.3
0.6 -0.06 -0.4 -0.4 0.1 0.6
0.6 0.06 0.4 -0.4 -0.006 -0.6

The obtained matrices \(U\) and \(V\) are used to decouple the system as shown in Figure 21.

plant_decouple_svd.png

Figure 21: Decoupled plant \(\bm{G}_{SVD}\) using the Singular Value Decomposition

The decoupled plant is then: \[ G_{SVD}(s) = U^{-1} G_u(s) V^{-H} \]

Gsvd = inv(U)*Gu*inv(V');

2.6 Verification of the decoupling using the “Gershgorin Radii”

The “Gershgorin Radii” is computed for the coupled plant \(G(s)\), for the “Jacobian plant” \(G_x(s)\) and the “SVD Decoupled Plant” \(G_{SVD}(s)\):

The “Gershgorin Radii” of a matrix \(S\) is defined by: \[ \zeta_i(j\omega) = \frac{\sum\limits_{j\neq i}|S_{ij}(j\omega)|}{|S_{ii}(j\omega)|} \]

This is computed over the following frequencies.

simscape_model_gershgorin_radii.png

Figure 22: Gershgorin Radii of the Coupled and Decoupled plants

2.7 Verification of the decoupling using the “Relative Gain Array”

The relative gain array (RGA) is defined as:

\begin{equation} \Lambda\big(G(s)\big) = G(s) \times \big( G(s)^{-1} \big)^T \end{equation}

where \(\times\) denotes an element by element multiplication and \(G(s)\) is an \(n \times n\) square transfer matrix.

The obtained RGA elements are shown in Figure 23.

simscape_model_rga.png

Figure 23: Obtained norm of RGA elements for the SVD decoupled plant and the Jacobian decoupled plant

2.8 Obtained Decoupled Plants

The bode plot of the diagonal and off-diagonal elements of \(G_{SVD}\) are shown in Figure 9.

simscape_model_decoupled_plant_svd.png

Figure 24: Decoupled Plant using SVD

Similarly, the bode plots of the diagonal elements and off-diagonal elements of the decoupled plant \(G_x(s)\) using the Jacobian are shown in Figure 10.

simscape_model_decoupled_plant_jacobian.png

Figure 25: Stewart Platform Plant from forces (resp. torques) applied by the legs to the acceleration (resp. angular acceleration) of the platform as well as all the coupling terms between the two (non-diagonal terms of the transfer function matrix)

2.9 Diagonal Controller

The control diagram for the centralized control is shown in Figure 11.

The controller \(K_c\) is “working” in an cartesian frame. The Jacobian is used to convert forces in the cartesian frame to forces applied by the actuators.

centralized_control.png

Figure 26: Control Diagram for the Centralized control

The SVD control architecture is shown in Figure 12. The matrices \(U\) and \(V\) are used to decoupled the plant \(G\).

svd_control.png

Figure 27: Control Diagram for the SVD control

We choose the controller to be a low pass filter: \[ K_c(s) = \frac{G_0}{1 + \frac{s}{\omega_0}} \]

\(G_0\) is tuned such that the crossover frequency corresponding to the diagonal terms of the loop gain is equal to \(\omega_c\)

wc = 2*pi*80;  % Crossover Frequency [rad/s]
w0 = 2*pi*0.1; % Controller Pole [rad/s]
K_cen = diag(1./diag(abs(evalfr(Gx, j*wc))))*(1/abs(evalfr(1/(1 + s/w0), j*wc)))/(1 + s/w0);
L_cen = K_cen*Gx;
G_cen = feedback(G, pinv(J')*K_cen, [7:12], [1:6]);
K_svd = diag(1./diag(abs(evalfr(Gsvd, j*wc))))*(1/abs(evalfr(1/(1 + s/w0), j*wc)))/(1 + s/w0);
L_svd = K_svd*Gsvd;
G_svd = feedback(G, inv(V')*K_svd*inv(U), [7:12], [1:6]);

The obtained diagonal elements of the loop gains are shown in Figure 28.

stewart_comp_loop_gain_diagonal.png

Figure 28: Comparison of the diagonal elements of the loop gains for the SVD control architecture and the Jacobian one

2.10 Closed-Loop system Performances

Let’s first verify the stability of the closed-loop systems:

isstable(G_cen)
ans =
  logical
   1
isstable(G_svd)
ans =
  logical
   1

The obtained transmissibility in Open-loop, for the centralized control as well as for the SVD control are shown in Figure 29.

stewart_platform_simscape_cl_transmissibility.png

Figure 29: Obtained Transmissibility

2.11 Small error on the sensor location   no_export

Let’s now consider a small position error of the sensor:

sens_pos_error = [105 5 -1]*1e-3; % [m]

The system is identified again:

Gx = Gu*inv(J');
Gx.InputName  = {'Fx', 'Fy', 'Fz', 'Mx', 'My', 'Mz'};
Gsvd = inv(U)*Gu*inv(V');
L_cen = K_cen*Gx;
G_cen = feedback(G, pinv(J')*K_cen, [7:12], [1:6]);
L_svd = K_svd*Gsvd;
G_svd = feedback(G, inv(V')*K_svd*inv(U), [7:12], [1:6]);
isstable(G_cen)
isstable(G_svd)

Author: Dehaeze Thomas

Created: 2020-11-23 lun. 18:00