From de392e5c40f31cf91c9a93d86fa0917052a24068 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Dehaeze
+This can be understood from figure 2 where \(\mathcal{F}_{x}\) and \(\mathcal{F}_{x,\text{ext}}\) have clearly the same effect on \(\mathcal{X}_{x}\). +
+ + ++
+Figure 2: Schematic representation of the stewart platform on a rigid support
+-The comparison between the obtained transfer functions is shown in Figure 2. +The comparison between the obtained transfer functions is shown in Figure 3.
-
Figure 2: Comparison of the transfer functions from \(\bm{\mathcal{F}}\) to \(\mathcal{\bm{X}}\) and from \(\bm{\mathcal{F}}_{\text{ext}}\) to \(\mathcal{\bm{X}}\) (png, pdf)
+Figure 3: Comparison of the transfer functions from \(\bm{\mathcal{F}}\) to \(\mathcal{\bm{X}}\) and from \(\bm{\mathcal{F}}_{\text{ext}}\) to \(\mathcal{\bm{X}}\) (png, pdf)
++The addition of a flexible support can be schematically represented in Figure 4. +We see that \(\mathcal{F}_{x}\) applies a force both on \(m\) and \(m^{\prime}\) whereas \(\mathcal{F}_{x,\text{ext}}\) only applies a force on \(m\). +And thus \(\mathcal{F}_{x}\) and \(\mathcal{F}_{x,\text{ext}}\) have clearly not the same effect on \(\mathcal{X}_{x}\). +
+ + ++
+Figure 4: Schematic representation of the stewart platform on top of a flexible support
@@ -677,8 +702,8 @@ And now at the Compliance matrix.
@@ -692,7 +717,7 @@ The low frequency transfer function matrix from \(\mathcal{\bm{F}}\) to \(\mathc
Created: 2020-02-13 jeu. 15:36
+Created: 2020-02-14 ven. 14:11
x~ZQhov9
zk75^MAk570K%fExFlJzX>@t9&cmW(tW<)FS;7n)$EDC+mB3@)?U`9k`@okv%f>Gz9
zPKZT@cKU&hjP=hyTfwk_2X`fX8-p