Version sent for printing the book

phd-thesis.org

@@ -10,8 +10,9 @@
 #+DATE: {{{time(%Y-%m-%d)}}}
 
 #+LATEX_CLASS: scrreprt
-#+LaTeX_CLASS_OPTIONS: [a4paper, 10pt, DIV=12, parskip=full, bibliography=totoc]
-# #+LATEX_CLASS_OPTIONS: [a4paper, twoside, 11pt, onecolumn, bibliography=totoc, openright, appendixprefix=true]
+# #+LaTeX_CLASS_OPTIONS: [a4paper, twoside, headings=openright, 10pt, DIV=12, BCOR=1cm, parskip=full, bibliography=totoc, usegeometry]
+#+LaTeX_CLASS_OPTIONS: [a4paper, twoside, headings=openright, 10pt, DIV=13, BCOR=1cm, parskip=full, bibliography=totoc]
+# #+LaTeX_CLASS_OPTIONS: [a4paper, 10pt, DIV=12, parskip=full, bibliography=totoc]
 
 #+OPTIONS: num:t toc:nil ':t *:t -:t ::t <:nil author:t date:t tags:nil todo:nil |:t H:5 title:nil
 
@@ -276,12 +277,16 @@ This approach represents a modest contribution towards a more open, reliable, an
 
 * Grants                                                              :ignore:
 
-#+begin_export latex
-\newpage
-\thispagestyle{empty}
-\vspace*{\fill}
+#+latex: \vspace*{\fill}
+
 The research presented in this manuscript has been possible thanks to the Fonds de la recherche scientifique (FRS-FNRS) through a FRIA grant given to Thomas Dehaeze.
-\vspace*{\fill}
+
+#+begin_export latex
+% \newpage
+% \thispagestyle{empty}
+% \vspace*{\fill}
+% The research presented in this manuscript has been possible thanks to the Fonds de la recherche scientifique (FRS-FNRS) through a FRIA grant given to Thomas Dehaeze.
+% \vspace*{\fill}
 #+end_export
 
 * Table of Contents                                                   :ignore:
@@ -649,7 +654,7 @@ A more comprehensive review of actively controlled end-stations is provided in S
 #+attr_latex: :width 0.95\linewidth
 [[file:figs/introduction_stages_villar.jpg]]
 #+end_subfigure
-#+attr_latex: :caption \subcaption{\label{fig:introduction_stages_nazaretski} NSLS-II HXN - Microscope. 1 and 2 are focusing optics, 3 is the sample location, 4 the sample stage and 5 the interferometers \cite{nazaretski17_desig_perfor_x_ray_scann}}
+#+attr_latex: :caption \subcaption{\label{fig:introduction_stages_nazaretski} NSLS-II HXN. 1 and 2 are focusing optics, 3 is the sample location, 4 the sample stage and 5 the interferometers \cite{nazaretski17_desig_perfor_x_ray_scann}}
 #+attr_latex: :options {0.48\textwidth}
 #+begin_subfigure
 #+attr_latex: :scale 0.9
@@ -1535,7 +1540,7 @@ The cumulative amplitude spectrum of the distance $d$ with all three active damp
 All three active damping methods give similar results.
 
 #+name: fig:uniaxial_cas_active_damping
-#+caption: Comparison of the acrlong:cas of the distance $d$ for all three active damping techniques.
+#+caption: Comparison of the Cumulative Amplitude Spectrum of the distance $d$ for all three active damping techniques.
 #+attr_latex: :options [htbp]
 #+begin_figure
 #+attr_latex: :caption \subcaption{\label{fig:uniaxial_cas_active_damping_soft}$k_n = 0.01\,\text{N}/\upmu\text{m}$}
@@ -2487,7 +2492,7 @@ For small values of $\omega_i$, the added damping is limited by the maximum allo
 For larger values of $\omega_i$, the attainable damping ratio decreases as a function of $\omega_i$ as was predicted from the root locus plot of Figure\nbsp{}ref:fig:rotating_iff_root_locus_hpf_large.
 
 #+name: fig:rotating_iff_modified_effect_wi
-#+caption: Root loci for several high-pass filter cut-off frequency (\subref{fig:rotating_root_locus_iff_modified_effect_wi}). The achievable damping ratio decreases as $\omega_i$ increases (\subref{fig:rotating_iff_hpf_optimal_gain}).
+#+caption: Root loci for several high-pass filter cut-off frequency (\subref{fig:rotating_root_locus_iff_modified_effect_wi}). Achievable damping ratio decreases as $\omega_i$ increases (\subref{fig:rotating_iff_hpf_optimal_gain}).
 #+attr_latex: :options [htbp]
 #+begin_figure
 #+attr_latex: :caption \subcaption{\label{fig:rotating_root_locus_iff_modified_effect_wi}Root locus}
@@ -2727,7 +2732,7 @@ It does not increase the low-frequency coupling as compared to the Integral Forc
 #+attr_latex: :caption \subcaption{\label{fig:rotating_rdc_root_locus}Root locus for Relative Damping Control}
 #+attr_latex: :options {0.49\linewidth}
 #+begin_subfigure
-#+attr_latex: :scale 0.8
+#+attr_latex: :scale 0.9
 [[file:figs/rotating_rdc_root_locus.png]]
 #+end_subfigure
 #+attr_latex: :caption \subcaption{\label{fig:rotating_rdc_damped_plant}Damped plant using Relative Damping Control}
@@ -2949,7 +2954,7 @@ The gain is chosen such that 99% of modal damping is obtained (obtained gains ar
 | $0.01\,\text{N}/\upmu\text{m}$ |  1600 |               0.99 |
 | $1\,\text{N}/\upmu\text{m}$  |  8200 |               0.99 |
 | $100\,\text{N}/\upmu\text{m}$ | 80000 |               0.99 |
-#+latex: \captionof{table}{\label{tab:rotating_rdc_opt_params_nass}Obtained optimal parameters for the acrlong:rdc}
+#+latex: \captionof{table}{\label{tab:rotating_rdc_opt_params_nass}Obtained optimal parameters for the RDC}
 #+end_minipage
 
 ***** Comparison of the Obtained Damped Plants
@@ -8055,7 +8060,7 @@ The sensor dynamics estimate $\hat{G}_i(s)$ may be a simple gain or a more compl
 #+caption: Sensor models with and without normalization.
 #+attr_latex: :options [htbp]
 #+begin_figure
-#+attr_latex: :caption \subcaption{\label{fig:detail_control_sensor_model}Model with noise $n_i$ and acrshort:lti transfer function $G_i(s)$}
+#+attr_latex: :caption \subcaption{\label{fig:detail_control_sensor_model}Model with noise $n_i$ and LTI transfer function $G_i(s)$}
 #+attr_latex: :options {0.48\textwidth}
 #+begin_subfigure
 #+attr_latex: :scale 1