From d0fbdd075ef91a4ec70f7fe3a3f7ce328677fbcc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Dehaeze Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 20:56:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Update Content - 2021-05-02 --- content/zettels/analog_to_digital_converters.md | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/zettels/analog_to_digital_converters.md b/content/zettels/analog_to_digital_converters.md index f8d3aa1..88ccdb4 100644 --- a/content/zettels/analog_to_digital_converters.md +++ b/content/zettels/analog_to_digital_converters.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Tags -- Delta Sigma ([Baker 2011](#orgf10fad8)) +- Delta Sigma ([Baker 2011](#orgb22f10b)) - Successive Approximation @@ -31,9 +31,9 @@ Let's suppose that the ADC is ideal and the only noise comes from the quantizati Interestingly, the noise amplitude is uniformly distributed. The quantization noise can take a value between \\(\pm q/2\\), and the probability density function is constant in this range (i.e., it’s a uniform distribution). -Since the integral of the probability density function is equal to one, its value will be \\(1/q\\) for \\(-q/2 < e < q/2\\) (Fig. [1](#org0a7db3b)). +Since the integral of the probability density function is equal to one, its value will be \\(1/q\\) for \\(-q/2 < e < q/2\\) (Fig. [1](#org57805de)). - + {{< figure src="/ox-hugo/probability_density_function_adc.png" caption="Figure 1: Probability density function \\(p(e)\\) of the ADC error \\(e\\)" >}} @@ -88,4 +88,4 @@ The quantization is: ## Bibliography {#bibliography} -Baker, Bonnie. 2011. “How Delta-Sigma Adcs Work, Part.” _Analog Applications_ 7. +Baker, Bonnie. 2011. “How Delta-Sigma Adcs Work, Part.” _Analog Applications_ 7.